MICROECONOMICS (CUSTOMIZED CHAPTERS + C
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781307215267
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG CUSTOM
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
3. Assume a city of 1,000,000 people, 60% of whom are willing to pay $1 maximum
(each) to clean up pollution. The rest of the population is wealthier and is willing to
pay $100 each to clean up pollution. Pollution clean-up costs $2,000,000. It has been
proposed that each person be taxed equally to pay for the pollution clean-up. Will
that pass a majority-rule vote? Is it desirable from the point of view of the Pareto
criterion? Is it a good idea, using the compensation principle? Which social choice
mechanism do you think is best on intuitive grounds, and why?
The graph shows the marginal social cost, supply, and demand curves in the hand sanitizer market. At what quantity could
the government set a quota to control this externality?
O 12
4
8.
Refer to the above supply and demand graph of Product X.
Q,
Quantity of Product X
What would happen if the government taxed the producers of this product because
it has negative externalities in production?
O 1) Supply would increase.
2) Demand would decrease.
O 3) Price would decrease.
4) Supply would decrease.
Price
Chapter 5 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS (CUSTOMIZED CHAPTERS + C
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Consider the town of Springfield with only three residents, Sophia, Amber, and Cedric. The three residents are trying to determine how large, in acres, they should build the public park. The following table shows each resident's willingness to pay for each acre of the park. Acres 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sophia 0 acres O1 acre 2 acres 10 8 6 3 1 O3 acres 0 Willingness to Pay (Dollars) Amber Refer to Table 11-1. Suppose the cost to build the park is $24 per acre and that the residents have agreed to split the cost of building the park equally. If the residents vote to determine the size of park to build, basing their decision solely on their own willingness to pay (and trying to maximize their own surplus), what is the largest park size for which the majority of residents would vote "yes?" 24 18 14 8 6 4 2 Cedric 6 5 4 3 2 1 0arrow_forwardSuppose Walmart has announced plans to seek approval from the planning commission of a small town to build a new store. Develop alist of the main arguments, pro and con, that could be presented at a public hearing on the matter by members of each of these groups: 1. Owners of small businesses located nearby.2. Town residents, and residents of nearby towns. How might a Walmart representative respond to the negative criticisms that might be brought up, and what other benefits could the representative offer the planning board to bolster Walmart’s case for gaining the board’s approval?arrow_forwardThe diagram below shows the marginal costs of pollution abatement for two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2. Dollars 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Firm 1 FIGURE 17-5 MC₁ li lz ls ls ls lo l Abatement Dollars 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Firm 2 MC₂ li z ls ls ls Q6 Q7 Abatement Refer to Figure 17-5. Suppose Firm 1 and Firm 2 are each abating Q3 units of pollution. If the government imposed an emissions tax of $40 per unit of emissions, OA) each firm would abate to the same level. B) Firm 2 would increase abatement beyond Q3 and Firm 1 would abate less than Q3. C) each firm would abate to Q3. D) the level of pollution would be optimal. E) Firm 1 would increase abatement beyond Q3 and Firm 2 would abate less than Q3.arrow_forward
- 3. Voluntary contributions toward a public goodLarry and Raphael are considering contributing toward the creation of a public park. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the public park or to keep that $400 for a new suit.Since a public park is a public good, both Larry and Raphael will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of benefit. For example, if both Larry and Raphael choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the public park. So, Larry and Raphael would each receive $640 of benefit from the public park, and their combined benefit would be $1,280. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table.Since a new suit is a private good, if Larry chooses to spend $400 on a new suit, Larry would get $400 of benefit from the new suit and Raphael wouldn't receive any benefit from Larry's choice. If Larry still spends $400 on a new suit and…arrow_forwardThe New York City Council is ready to vote on two billsthat authorize the construction of new roads in Manhattanand Brooklyn. If the two boroughs join forces, they can passboth bills, but neither borough by itself has enough powerto pass a bill. If a bill is passed, then it will cost the taxpayersof each borough $1 million, but if roads are built in aborough, the benefits to the borough are estimated to be $10million. The council votes on both bills simultaneously, andeach councilperson must vote on the bills without knowinghow anybody else will vote. Assuming that each boroughsupports its own bill, determine whether this game has anyequilibrium points. Is this game analogous to the Prisoner’sDilemma? Explain why or why not.arrow_forwardQuestion 22 Let Q be quantity of beer (in packs) consumed in the US. Assume beer consumption imposes a negative externality of $30 per pack. The private demand for beer is P=150-2Q while the private supply curve is P=Q. If the government impose a $30 tax per pack what is the change in total surplus from before to after the imposition of the tax. -$150 beer, $150 O $1.350 o 51,350arrow_forward
- Suppose the equation for the demand curve in a market is P=100 – 2Q. Also, suppose the equation for the supply curve in the same market is P=10+3Q. Suppose there is an external cost of $20 associated with the production of each unit of the good. The socially optimal quantity is O 4 units smaller than the market equilibrium quantity. O 22 units greater than the market equilibrium quantity O 14 units smaller than the market equilibrium quantity O 4 units greater than the market equilibrium quantity.arrow_forward2. In this problem, you will compare the level of a public good chosen under majority voting to the socially-optimal level under three different sets of circumstances. Suppose first that individual i's demand curve for z is given by αi/z, where αi is a positive parameter. Instead of being linear, this demand curve is a hyperbola. Suppose further that z costs $1 per unit to produce (c = 1) and that this cost is shared equally among consumers. Therefore, cost per person is 1/n per unit of z. Then consider the three sets of circumstances listed below. Each situation has a different number of consumers in the economy and different collections of α values for the consumers. The number of consumers is denoted n and the vector of α values is denoted A = (α1,α2,...,αn-1,αn). Case 1: n = 7, A = (4, 2, 12, 4, 5, 13, 8). Case 2: n = 5, A = (10, 6, 11, 14, 8). Case 3: n = 9, A = (6, 9, 10, 4.5, 12, 7, 13.5, 8, 11). Using this information, do the following: a)For each case, compute the preferred z…arrow_forward2. Consider a society consisting with three individuals whose demand curves for a pure public good are Pa = 100-X, P = 110- X, Pe=150-X for individual A, B, and C respectively. Marginal costs are constant and equal to $150 for each unit provided. (b) Suppose the government provided this output rate and taxed each person at a rate of $50/unit. Would the voters approve a referendum calling for a 5-unit reduction in X? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Price at a ~ a X b a Q₂ Q3 Q4 Collective quantity demanded and supplied 0 S Refer to the above supply and demand graph for a public good. Assume that the economy currently produces this public good at a quantity Q 3. Based on this information we can conclude that the: O a. total benefit of this public good is less O b. total benefit of this public good is greater than the total cost, so society should than the total cost, so society should produce less of the good. produce more of the good. O c. marginal benefit of this public good is greater than the marginal cost, so society should produce less of the good. O d. marginal benefit of this public good is less than the marginal cost, so society should produce less of the good.arrow_forwardEXPLAIN THOROUGHLY 1) What are some of the problems that result when a government prints money rather than raises taxes to pay its expenses? 2) How should user charges for government-provided goods and services be set to achieve efficientoutputs and usage rates of such products? 3) Indicate whether you agree with the following statement, and give your reasons for doing so: “Ifthe highways crossing the City of Koronadal were a pure public good, efficiency would require that the price to use the road be zero. However, during rush hour congestion, the road cannot be regarded as a pure public good and a toll should be charged for its use.” If an automated vehicle identification system were established for residents of the City of Koronadal who use the highways, how would you set tolls to achieve efficient use of the road? The AVI system would allow you to send a bill to each user of the road each month based on miles traveled on the road and the price you charge which could vary by time of…arrow_forwardP = 16-.25Q MC = 2 + .25Q Production creates an external benefit equal to $2 per unit. What price and quantity maximize profit in this market? O28, $10 28, $9 O 24, $9 O 24, $10arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
