EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781337668279
Author: Henderson
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 8QAP
To determine
To determine the questions that the economist would consider relevant in determining the value of a life and the reactions of the environmentalists on them.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Environmentalists and economists often find themselves at odds with each other. The conflict between the romantics and the rationalists surfaced again in the debate over air-quality standards set under the Clean Air Act of 1990. Under the law, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must establish standards that promote public health. The EPA’s cost-benefit analysis assigns a value for each life saved of $4.8 million. Is $4.8 million a reasonable value to place on a life? What questions would economists consider relevant in determining the value of a life? How would environmentalists react to the questions economists ask?
People tend to view car travel as being safer than airplane travel, but a person is how many times more likely to die from a car accident than from an airplane crash?
Anne has just purchased a new house in a lovely neighborhood. Her neighbors are friendly and even brought her house-warming gifts. Anne, however, has a problem. Her neighbors have cats, and Anne hates cats. Even though the city has a law requiring all outdoor pets to be on a leash, her neighbors ignore it, and the cats roam all over Anne's property.
How would an economist describe this situation? Is there anything Anne can do? Can you think of a Coase- like private solution?
Chapter 6 Solutions
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Do you believe expenditures for child care and fitness facilities are warranted from a cost-benefit perspective? Why or why not?arrow_forwardCost-benefit analysis is an effective approach to making decisions. The world would be better if more people practiced cost-benefit analysis more consistently. Are their moral duties that transcend cost-benefit analysis? If so, how do we identify those duties?arrow_forwardWhat is the principal question Coase posits when it comes to negative externalities? Who should be allowed to inflict harm on whom? Who is morally correct in any given argument about harm? How large is the harm caused?arrow_forward
- Newsom has committed the state to a $990-million agreement with a China-based electric car company to produce 200 million protective masks. If you were an economics professor, what grade would you give Governor Newsom on his mask deal. Was the decision to pay high prices for PPE in the immediate aftermath of the onset of the virus a good financial decision? Is the evidence consistent with Newsom being corrupt and/or ignorant of basic economic theory?arrow_forward. Your best friend has just purchased a new Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV). “These things are great.” he says. “They can get you to the private unspoiled places no one else can reach. On the road, it’s nice because you sit so high and can see over the other cars.” Your friend thinks everyone should buy an SUV. Is there an error in his reasoning? If so, what is it? (Use economics terms).arrow_forwardIn the diagram, the MB1 curve shifts rightward to the MB2 curve when Multiple Choice new technology makes pollution abatement less expensive. society decides that it wants cleaner air and water because of new information about the adverse health effects of pollution. new technology makes pollution abatement more expensive. society decides that they are no longer concerned about any adverse health effects of pollution.arrow_forward
- How does the precautionary principle work? Describe how the precautionary principle would be applied to shape policy in relation to a particular environmental issue, such as global warming or deforestation.arrow_forwardHow does cost-benefit analysis differ from cost-effectiveness analysis?arrow_forwardIf libertarianism rejects intrinsic value of people, animals, and the environment, is this a good reason to reject libertarianism?arrow_forward
- Economic analysis is limited in its ability to forecast precise choices of a given individual because:arrow_forwardIf behavior is governed by rational self interest why do people make charitable contributions of time and moneyarrow_forwardDoes the same principal-agent conflict exist when people donate other items such as bone marrow, blood, eggs, sperm? Please explain why or why not.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning