Case summary:A person SK bought a spa, of the GL company, from a person VP, and signed an installation contract. After three months, SK’s daughter, L injured her index finger from the spa’s hydromassage jet. She was left alone in the spa at the time. The local police and the rescue team were called for help. They were successful in getting L’s finger free. L was taken to the local emergency room. It was revealed there that L’s finger bone had broken in two places.
To explain :The particular theory of product liability that can be used by the person SK to sue the person VP.
Explanation of Solution
According to product liability based on negligence, if there is a failure on the part of a manufacturer or seller to exercise due care to make the product safe to use, he/she can be sued by the person who gets injured by that product. In the given case, the person SK’s daughter got injured from the spa’s jet. She can use the theory of negligence of product liability to sue the person VP and claim that there were design defects associated with the spa and the absence of a proper warning in relation to its use.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- Hannah hates her sister Ivana with a passion so Hannah decides to poison her. Ivana drinks the soup that Hannah has poisoned, but for some reason, she does not die. She only experiences a tummy ache and starts vomitting. She is rushed to the hospital but does not die. What kind of crime was committed? Consummated Frustrated Attemptedarrow_forwardLend Co. discovered that one of its employees, Dana, is an alcoholic. Her manager realized that Dana's alcoholism must be the reason for her absenteeism. To help Dana overcome her alcoholiśm, the employer provided her with counseling services and also asked her to make a firm choice between treatment and discipline. Lend Co. also offered outpatient treatment, and Dana participated in the program without success. When all of these efforts failed, Lend Co. offered to provide inpatient treatment, and Dana refused. Lend Co. fired Dana. According to the courts: O A. Dana has a valid claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act because she willingly participated in the outpatient treatment, even though it did not produce positive results. O B. Lend Co. is not liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it offered a reasonable accommodation, and Dana refused. O C. Lend Co, is liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it failed to offer Dana time off from…arrow_forwardJohnson, president of the First National Bank of A, believes that it is appropriate to employ only female tellers. Hence, First National refuses to employ Ken Baker as a teller but does offer him a maintenance position at the same salary. Baker brings a cause of action against First National Bank. Is First National illegally discriminating based on gender? Why?arrow_forward
- Please do not give solution in image formate thanku What is the point of having a known endangerment provision if it does not apply to the endangered Borjohn employees? Whome does the statute protect and why? Explainarrow_forwardPlease do not give solution in image formate thanku. Catherine Creteau and her husband contracted with a travel agency, Liberty Travel, to arrange a trip to Jamaica.While staying in Jamaica in accommodations arranged by Liberty Travel, they were robbed at gunpoint. The Creteaus alleged that Liberty Travel either knew of safety issues with the accommodations or such information was available to Liberty Travel. What duty did the Creteaus allege their agent had breached?arrow_forwardAmanda is babysitting when her charge Tomas leaps off a couch onto a glass table and breaks it, leaving him with many cuts. To show that Amanda was negligent, Tomas’s parents must show that: Amanda owed a duty of care to Tomas Amanda breached her duty of watching over Tomas by her actions (e.g., talking on the phone or not staying in the same room as Tomas) Tomas was harmed only because Amanda breached her duty to watch over him All of the abovearrow_forward
- Lucy cannot stand the fact that her ex-husband, Ethan, is about to get remarried. After all, it was a horrible breakup, and Ethan was really mean to her. Lucy decides to get her revenge by telling Ethan’s employer that Ethan stole large amounts of money from his previous employer, even though Lucy knows it is not true. If Lucy follows through on her plan, she will have: a) not committed the tort of defamation because the statement would not harm Ethan’s reputation. b) committed the tort of defamation because it is an untrue statement intended to harm Ethan’s reputation, and she stated it to another person. c) not committed the tort of defamation, because she only made the statement to one person.arrow_forwardAmanda is babysitting when her charge Tomas leaps off a couch onto a glass table and breaks it, leaving him with many cuts. To show that Amanda was negligent, Tomas’s parents must show that: A. Amanda owed a duty of care to Tomas B. Amanda breached her duty of watching over Tomas by her actions (e.g., talking on the phone or not staying in the same room as Tomas) C. Tomas was harmed only because Amanda breached her duty to watch over him D. All of the abovearrow_forwardPaula Plaintiff owns Paula’s Boutique, one of the most popular stores in town. William Wicked owns the store next to Paula’s Boutique. William has been jealous of Paula’s success. William, in an effort to increase his own business, begins to tell his customers that Paula is dishonest and unethical. William even puts a sign in his front window warning potential customers not to shop at Paula’s Boutique because of her deceitful and unethical practices. Paula is upset when she finds out what William has been doing. Paula has always been honest and ethical with her customers and now her business is suffering because of William’s dishonesty. Paula decides that something must be done about this situation. What advice would you give Paula? Discuss the possible tort claim Paula might have against William. Be sure to include the elements of the tort and relate those elements to the scenario. If Paula decides to pursue a claim against William, should she consider a lawsuit, mediation, or…arrow_forward
- Patrick Clawson was described by reporter Karen Branch-Brioso in a newspaper story as a “1970s era St. Louis journalist turned private eye turned FBI informant.” The story was published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The fact that he had been characterized as an informant bothered Clawson, who saw it as damaging to his reputation. Accordingly, he brought a libel case against the Post-Dispatch. Recall that to be libelous, a statement must be false and “hold the victim up to ridicule, contempt, or hatred.” Clawson would have preferred the term whistleblower rather than informant because that term commands more respect. Why is the use of the term informant to describe Clawson not libelous?arrow_forwardPablo, a resident of New Mexico, while driving through Arizona, was struck by an SUV driven by Derek, a resident of California. Derek was speeding when the accident happened, and Pablo suffered severe injuries that ruined a potential acting career. Pablo's damages are estimated at $200,000. What type of case is this?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education