Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7, Problem 21CP
Summary Introduction
To discuss: Whether the girls have a cause of action against company W.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Jolie, an employee of Tenholder, Inc., was drinking during her lunch break on Tuesday. When she got back to work, her boss, Brian, noticed that she had been drinking and sent her home for the remainder of the day, without pay. Brian instructed Jolie to leave her car at work and take a Taxi home and he would pick her up in the morning on his way back into work. Jolie disobeyed and drove home. On her way home, Jolie caused an accident. Is Tenholder, Inc. liable for the damages resulting from the car accident? Is there an agency relationship exists between Jolie and Tenholder, Inc?
On March 17, Peckham bought a new car from Larsen Chevrolet for $16,400. During the first one and one-half months after the purchase, Peckham discovered that the car’s hood was dented, its gas tank contained no baffles, its emergency brake was inoperable, the car did not have a jack or a spare tire, and neither the clock nor the speedometer worked. Larsen claimed that Peckham knew of the defects at the time of the purchase. Peckham, on the other hand, claimed that he did not know the extent of the defects and that despite his repeated efforts the defects were not repaired until June 11. Then, on July 15, the car’s dashboard caught fire, leaving the car’s interior damaged and the car itself inoperable. Peckham then returned to Larsen Chevrolet and told Larsen that he had to repair the car at his own expense or that he, Peckham, would either rescind the contract or demand a new automobile. Peckham also claimed that at the end of their conversation he notified Larsen Chevrolet that he was…
Abigail is in the business of selling fine antiques. Abigail purchased an antique desk for $5,000 from Jackson, and gave a promissory note for payment. Concerned that Jackson might not accept the note, Abigail had her friend Catalina sign the promissory note as well. Jackson accepted the note as payment. Two weeks later, Jackson sought payment on the note. Abigail told Jackson that she is not responsible for the promissory note because Catalina signed the note too, and Jackson had to seek payment from Catalina first.
Abigail also spotted a beautiful set of vintage chairs owned by Max that would be perfect for her store. Abigail wrote a $10,000 check, also signed by her business associate Orville as an accommodation party, to Max to pay for the chairs. Max presented the check to Westville Savings, the bank where Abigail has a checking account, for payment. Westville Savings dishonored the check claiming Abigail had insufficient funds. Who is liable for these negotiable…
Chapter 7 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 7 - Prob. 1COCh. 7 - Prob. 2COCh. 7 - Prob. 3COCh. 7 - Prob. 4COCh. 7 - Prob. 5COCh. 7 - Prob. 1QCh. 7 - Prob. 2QCh. 7 - Prob. 3QCh. 7 - Prob. 4QCh. 7 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 7 - Prob. 6QCh. 7 - Prob. 7QCh. 7 - Prob. 8QCh. 7 - Prob. 9QCh. 7 - Prob. 10QCh. 7 - Prob. 11CPCh. 7 - Prob. 12CPCh. 7 - Prob. 13CPCh. 7 - Prob. 14CPCh. 7 - Prob. 15CPCh. 7 - Prob. 16CPCh. 7 - Prob. 17CPCh. 7 - Prob. 18CPCh. 7 - Prob. 19CPCh. 7 - Prob. 20CPCh. 7 - Prob. 21CPCh. 7 - Prob. 22CPCh. 7 - Prob. 1TSCh. 7 - Prob. 2TSCh. 7 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Mrs. Mieske delivered 32 fifty-foot reels of developed movie film to the Bartell Drug Company to be spliced together into four reels for viewing convenience. She placed the films, which contained irreplaceable pictures of her family’s activities over a period of years, into the order in which they were to be spliced and then delivered them to the manager of Bartell. The manager placed a film-processing packet on the bag of films and gave Mrs. Mieske a receipt that stated, “We assume no responsibility beyond retail cost of film unless otherwise agreed to in writing.” Although the disclaimer was not discussed, Mrs. Mieske’s parting words to the store manager were, “Don’t lose these. They are my life.” Bartell sent the film to its processing agent, GAF Corporation, which intended to send them to another processing lab for splicing. While at the GAF laboratory, however, the film was accidentally placed in the garbage dumpster and was never recovered. Upon learning of the loss of their…arrow_forwardAnn took Bonnie’s watch before Bonnie was aware of the theft. Bonnie discovered her loss immediately and pursued Ann. Ann pointed a loaded pistol at Bonnie, who, in fear of being shot, allowed Ann to escape. Was Ann guilty of robbery? Of any other crime?arrow_forwardBob went out with his friends to celebrate his birthday. They went to a bar where they drank copious quantities of alcohol. In the morning, Bob had not slept and was still obviously intoxicated. He found his way to a car dealership near his house and entered into a contract to buy a Mercedes Benz SUV for the cost of $140,000.00. The car salesman could smell alcohol on Bob's breath, he noticed his eyes were bloodshot and "glossy" while they were signing the papers relating to the sale, and when Bob left he could see that he was unsteady on his feet. Bob left the dealership and went home and went to bed. He slept for two days. The car salesman from the dealership called Bob 4 days later to tell him that his vehicle was ready for pick up. Bob had no memory of the buying any car. In these circumstances:A. the contract is void ab initio because Bob lacked capacity to contract due to his intoxicationB. Bob can avoid or repudiate the contract within a reasonable time after he regains capacity…arrow_forward
- Kate owned a small grocery store. One day John went to the store and purchased a can of chip dip that was, unknown to Kate or John, adulterated. John became seriously ill after eating the dip and sued Kate for damages on the grounds that she breached an implied warranty of merchantability. Is Kate liable? Why?arrow_forwardBob offered to sell Teresa his used motorcycle. She took a look at it and asked Bob how it ran, to which Bob replied that it was in good shape. Teresa thought the motorcycle was two years old when she purchased it. A few days later, she discovered that it was actually five years old. She asks Bob to take back the motorcycle. He tells her no way, that he thought she knew the age of that model, and that she should have asked him if she had any uncertainty. If Teresa sues, who is likely to win and why?arrow_forwardA received from X a pendant with diamonds valued at P400,500 to be sold on commission basis or to be returned on demand. In the evening of February 1, 2020, while walking home to her residence, two men snatched her purse containing the pendant and ran away. Subsequently, the snatchers were apprehended and charged. During the pendency of the criminal case, X brought an action against A for recovery of the pendant or of its value and damages. The latter interposed the defense of fortuitous event, but the former contends: (a) that the defense of fortuitous event is untenable because there was negligence on the part of the defendant; and (b) that if the defense is tenable, nevertheless, there must be a prior conviction for robbery before it can be availed of. Decide the case.arrow_forward
- Jane is fifteen years old. She visited a Grocery (Rip-off) and requested food items, which cost about $100. Jane’s parents are out of town and she is very short on food supplies and as such Rip-off gave to her the much needed groceries. However, when her parents returned home a few days later, they refused to pay for the groceries. They quickly pointed out that Jane is a minor and she does not have any contractual capacity.arrow_forwardIshmael is a tenant of a home unit owned by Angela. Ten days ago Ishmael received a letter from Angela in which Angela stated that she was ‘interested in selling’ her flat and asked Ishmael to ‘let her know’ if he (Ishmael) was willing to buy the home unit for the price of $200,000. Three days later Ishmael posted a letter to Angela in which he agreed to buy the home unit for the price set out in Angela’s letter. After receiving Ishmael’s letter, Angela telephoned Ishmael and told him that she had decided that she did not want to sell the home unit. Also, Benjamin & Karen while visiting Joana & Bernice doing their national service in Koforidua decided to go shopping for groceries at the supermarket. In the shop, Karen sees a nice ladies bag she likes with a price tag of GH 200.00. Karen, therefore, picked up the bag and walked to the till to make payment. While at the till however, Karen was told that the price displayed on the item was not the same on the receipt at the…arrow_forwardDaniel’s son told him that when he died, he wanted to be cremated and his remains placed in a columbarium. They are of the Roman Catholic faith. The son did die suddenly and was buried by Daniel in The Place of the Holy Sepulture with Saint Anthony under the rules and canons of the Roman Catholic Church. These canons prohibit the following: cremation, except in cases of great emergency; removal of bodies from a cemetery for cremation; and removal of a body from the cemetery without consent of the Archbishop of San Diego. Five years later, Daniel sought to remove his son’s body, claiming he made a mistake, was grief stricken, and was under the influence of the Roman Catholic Church at the time of the death and was not able to observe his wishes. He further claimed the prohibitions of the church were never called to his attention. The Church refused to allow the removal, claiming they had no knowledge of the son’s wishes, and that he agreed to the rules and canons at the time of…arrow_forward
- Pauline Brown was shot and seriously injured by an unknown assailant in the parking lot of National Supermarkets. Pauline and George Brown brought a negligence action against National, Sentry Security Agency, and T. G. Watkins, a security guard and Sentry employee. Sentry had a security contract with National. The Browns maintained that the defendants have a legal duty to protect National’s customers both in the store and in the parking lot, and that this duty was breached. The defendants denied this allegation. What will the Browns have to prove to prevail? Explain.arrow_forwardJoseph Eugene Dodson, age sixteen, purchased a used pickup truck from Burns and Mary Shrader. The Shraders owned and operated Shrader’s Auto Sales. Dodson paid $14,900 in cash for the truck. At the time of sale, the Shraders did not question Dodson’s age, but thought he was eighteen or nineteen. Dodson made no misrepresentation concerning his age. Nine months after the date of purchase, the truck began to develop mechanical problems. A mechanic diagnosed the problem as a burnt valve but could not be certain. Dodson, who could not afford the repairs, continued to drive the truck until one month later, when the engine “blew up.” Dodson parked the vehicle in the front yard of his parents’ home and contacted the Shraders to rescind the purchase of the truck and to request a full refund. a. What arguments would support Dodson’s termination of the contract? b. What arguments would support Shrader’s position that the contract is not voidable? c. Which side should prevail? Explain.arrow_forwardSonenberg Company managed Westchester Manor Apartments through its on-site property manager, Judith. Manor Associates Limited Partnership, whose general partner is Westchester Manor, Ltd., owned the complex. The entry sign to the property did not reveal the owner’s name but did disclose that Sonenberg managed the property. Judith contacted Redi-Floors and requested a proposal for installing carpet in several of the units. In preparing the proposal, Redi-Floors confirmed that Sonenberg was the managing company and that Judith was its on-site property manager. Sonenberg did not inform Redi-Floors of the owner’s identity. Judith and her assistant orally ordered the carpet, and Redi-Floors installed the carpet. Redi-Floors sent invoices to the complex and received checks from “Westchester Manor Apartments.” Believing that Sonenberg owned the complex, Redi-Floors did not learn of the true owner’s identity until after the work had been completed when a dispute arose concerning the payment of…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON