A spread footing supported on a sandy soil has been designed using ASD to support a certain column load with a factor of safety of 2.5 against a bearing capacity failure. However, there is some uncertainty in both the column load, P, and the friction angle,
Learn your wayIncludes step-by-step video
Chapter 7 Solutions
Foundation Design: Principles and Practices (3rd Edition)
Additional Engineering Textbook Solutions
Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers (4th Edition)
Java: An Introduction to Problem Solving and Programming (8th Edition)
Problem Solving with C++ (9th Edition)
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Electrical Engineering: Principles & Applications (7th Edition)
Starting Out with Java: From Control Structures through Data Structures (4th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
- A spread footing supported on a sandy soil has been designed using ASD to support a certaincolumn load with a factor of safety of 2.5 against a bearing capacity failure. However, there issome uncertainty in both the column load, P, and the friction angle, f. Which would have thegreatest impact on the actual factor of safety: an actual P that is twice the design value, or actualf that is half the design value? Use bearing capacity computations with reasonable assumedvalues to demonstrate the reason for your response.arrow_forwardA square footing having a dimension of 4m has its bottom at a depth of 3.2m Trom the ground surface. The water table is located at an insignificant depth. FS=3 Properties of wet soil are as follows: Specific gravity, Gs = 2.7 Void ratio, e = 0.35 Degree of saturation = 70% Cohesion, c = 19 kPa Angle of internal friction = 26 degrees Assume general shear failure. Calculate the following: 1. Gross Ultimate Bearing Capacity of the footing using Terzaghi's assumption, kPa. 2. Net Allowable Bearing Capacity of the footing using Terzaghi's assumption, kPa.arrow_forwardPlate-load tests were conducted in-situ for a commercial building project in Rizal, where preliminary investigation indicated the presence of sandy soil. The apparatus had a circular plate with a radius of 0.38m. The results suggests an ultimate bearing pressure of 349 kN/m2. The plate was placed at a depth of 1.90m from the surface, with the soil having a unit weight of 16.87kN/m3. If a circular footing with radius of 1.15m will be used, what must be the maximum net live load (kN) if the net dead load is 349kN? Consider a safety factor of 3.5 and ASD Plate-load tests were conducted in-situ for a commercial building project in Rizal, where preliminary investigation indicated the presence of sandy soil. The apparatus had a circular plate with a radius of 0.38m. The results suggests an ultimate bearing pressure of 349 kN/m2. The plate was placed at a depth of 1.90m from the surface, with the soil having a unit weight of 16.87kN/m3. If a circular footing with radius of 1.15m will be…arrow_forward
- A strip footing is to be designed to carry a load of 800 kN/m at the depth of 7m in a gravelly sand . the appropriate shear strenght parameter are c =0 and φ=40o. Determine the width of the footing if a factor of safety 3 against shear failure is specified and assuming that that the water table may raise to foundation level.Above the water table the unit weight of the sand is 17 kn/m3 and below the water table the saturated unit weight is 20 kN/m3arrow_forwardAssume we are building a foundation on a saturated clay deposit with an average undrainedshear strength of 2,000 lb/ft2 and a COV of 0.2. The average unit weight for the soil is102 lb/ft3 with a COV of 0.05. What is the mean short-term nominal bearing capacity of acontinuous footing founded at a depth of 5 ft? What is the probability that the nominal bearing capacity of a certain footing would be less than 75 percent of the mean nominal bearing capac-ity if the undrained shear strength and unit weight are normally distributed and independent?arrow_forward(a) Determine the wall loading that can be carried by a long footing 1 m wide and located 1.5 m below the ground surface. Strength tests indicate that the soil has a cohesion of 58 kN/m2 and an angle of internal friction of20°. The total soil unit weight is 18 kN/m3. The soil above the footing is well compacted, and the depth factors will apply. The soil rigidity index is greater than the critical index. The water table is expected to rise to the ground surface. Use a factor of safety equal to 3 with the extended general bearing capacity equation.(b) Recalculate the design bearing capacity assuming the depth factors do not apply. What percentage change in bearing capacity does this represent (compared to the answer in part a)?(c) Recalculate the bearing capacity for the conditions of part a but where the water table is very deep.arrow_forward
- A plate load test was conducted on sandy soil. The plate used is 81 cm square. The ultimate load per unit area (qu) is 720 kN/m^2. What is the maximum allowable load of a 3m square footing? Use factor of safety of 3.arrow_forwardA 2.0 m 2.0 m square pad footing will be placed in a normally consolidated clay soil to carry a column load Q. The depth of the footing is 1.0 m. The soil parameters are: c = 0, = 26, = 19 kN/m3, and cu = 60 kN/m2. Determine the maximum possible value for Q, considering short-term and long-term stability of the footing.arrow_forwardA flexible circular footing of radius R carries a uniform pressure q. Find the depth (in terms of R) at which the vertical stress below the center is 20% of q.arrow_forward
- Repeat Problem 11.1 based on limit state design, using the factors given in Table 11.4. 11.1 A continuous foundation is required in a soil where , , and . The depth of the footing will be 1.0 m. The dead load and the live load are 600 kN/m and 400 kN/m, respectively. Determine the required width for the foundation based on allowable stress design with FS = 3, using Eq. (6.10) and Table 6.1.arrow_forwardRedo Problem 16.2 using the modified general ultimate bearing capacity Eq. (16.31). 16.1 A continuous footing is shown in Figure 16.17. Using Terzaghis bearing capacity factors, determine the gross allowable load per unit area (qall) that the footing can carry. Assume general shear failure. Given: = 19 kN/m3, c = 31kN/m2, =28, Df = 1.5 m, B = 2 m, and factor of safety = 3.5. Figure 16.17 6.2 Refer to Problem 16.1. If a square footing with dimension 2 m 2 m is used instead of the wall footing, what would be the allowable bearing capacity?arrow_forwardRedo Problem 16.13 with the following data: gross allowable load = 184,000 lb, = 121 lb/ft3, c = 0, =26, Df = 6.5 ft., and required factor of safety = 2.5. 16.13 A square footing (B B) must carry a gross allowable load of 1160 kN. The base of the footing is to be located at a depth of 2 m below the ground surface. If the required factor of safety is 4.5, determine the size of the footing. Use Terzaghis bearing capacity factors and assume general shear failure of soil. Given: = 17 kN/m3, c = 48 kN/m2, =31.arrow_forward
- Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap C...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781305970939Author:Braja M. Das, Khaled SobhanPublisher:Cengage LearningFundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781305635180Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam SivakuganPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781337705028Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam SivakuganPublisher:Cengage Learning