INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING LL W/CONNECT
5th Edition
ISBN: 9781264100293
Author: Doupnik
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 19EP
a.
To determine
Determine the reason to include the income of subsidiaries in Country ‘HK’ and ‘Country H’ in the taxable income of U.S. taxable income.
b.
To determine
Calculate the amount of foreign tax credit allowed by the US and the amount of excess foreign tax credit.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Bintang Seri, an Indonesian company has a Malaysian subsidiary that earned MYR30 million this year. Sari Bulan, which is also resided in Indonesia has a Malaysian subsidiary that earned MYR20 million this year. The subsidiary of Bintang Seri plans to reinvest its earnings in Malaysia while the subsidiary of Sari Bulan plans to remit its earnings to the Indonesian parent. Another Indonesian company, Milando does not have a Malaysian subsidiary but it received revenue of MYR 40 million this year from exporting to Malaysia. All three companies have the same total revenue and total earnings levels (when considering their Indonesian business as well), and are the same size, and do not have any other international business. Which company is subject to the highest degree of translation exposure? Justify your answer with thorough explanation on all companies.
SkiCo, a Maine corporation, operates a branch in Peru selling equipment to persons planning to ski in the Andes mountain range. Peru levies an income tax on Peruvian companies equal to 25 percent of net income, with respect to foreign corporations such as SkiCo that operate in Peru, the government does not impose an income tax, but does impose a "foreign-company sales tax" equal to eight percent of the foreign corporation's Peruvian sales revenue. During the year, SkiCo's branch has sales of $200,000, expenses of $150,000 and pays a foreign-company sales tax of $16,000. If SkiCo were a Peruvian company, it would have paid Peruvian income tax of $12,500.
(a) Is the foreign company sales tax creditable under §901 or §903?
(b) Assume that SkiCo is required to pay both the $16,000 foreign-company sales tax and $12,500 Peruvian income tax on its branch operations. Is either type of Peruvian tax creditable under §901 or §903?
ABC Inc. is a U.S. firm with annual export sales to Canada of about C$500 million. Its main competitor is XYZ Inc., also based in the United States, with a subsidiary in Canada that generates about C$500 million in annual sales. Any earnings generated by the subsidiary are reinvested to support its operations. Based on the information provided, which company is subject to a higher degree of translation exposure? Explain.
Chapter 8 Solutions
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING LL W/CONNECT
Ch. 8 - Prob. 1QCh. 8 - Prob. 2QCh. 8 - Prob. 3QCh. 8 - 4. What is the difference between the worldwide...Ch. 8 - Prob. 5QCh. 8 - Prob. 6QCh. 8 - Prob. 7QCh. 8 - 13. What is treaty shopping?
Ch. 8 - What is base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)?Ch. 8 - What is the purpose of the OECDs base erosion and...
Ch. 8 - Prob. 11QCh. 8 - Prob. 12QCh. 8 - Prob. 13QCh. 8 - Prob. 14QCh. 8 - Prob. 15QCh. 8 - Prob. 16QCh. 8 - Prob. 17QCh. 8 - Prob. 18QCh. 8 - Prob. 19QCh. 8 - Prob. 20QCh. 8 - Prob. 21QCh. 8 - Prob. 22QCh. 8 - Prob. 23QCh. 8 - Prob. 1EPCh. 8 - Prob. 2EPCh. 8 - Prob. 3EPCh. 8 - 4. Why might companies have an incentive to...Ch. 8 - Prob. 5EPCh. 8 - Prob. 6EPCh. 8 - Prob. 7EPCh. 8 - Prob. 8EPCh. 8 - Prob. 9EPCh. 8 - Prob. 10EPCh. 8 - Prob. 11EPCh. 8 - Prob. 12EPCh. 8 - Prob. 13EPCh. 8 - Prob. 14EPCh. 8 - Prob. 15EPCh. 8 - Prob. 16EPCh. 8 - Prob. 17EPCh. 8 - Prob. 18EPCh. 8 - Prob. 19EPCh. 8 - Prob. 20EPCh. 8 - Heraklion Company (a U.S.-based company) is...Ch. 8 - Prob. 22EPCh. 8 - Prob. 23EPCh. 8 - Prob. 24EPCh. 8 - Prob. 25EPCh. 8 - Prob. 26EPCh. 8 - Prob. 27EPCh. 8 - Prob. 28EPCh. 8 - Prob. 29EPCh. 8 - Prob. 1C
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Cloth plc is the parent of the enterprise and has a manufacturing subsidiary, Tweed Inc, which is based in the US. Tweed Inc purchases 60% of its manufacturing inputs from the parent company, and the remaining 40% from an unrelated New Zealand company Darwin Wools Limited. Tweed Inc sells 40% of its output to retailers in the Eurozone, 40% to retailers in the UK, and exports the remaining 20% to retailers in Canada. Tweed Inc is negotiating with their New Zealand supplier, Darwin Wools Limited, to purchase a consignment of wool. The order is for 1 million kilos of wool. Darwin Wools Limited has insisted that they receive New Zealand Dollars (NZ$). Tweed Inc agree to pay NZ$ 500,000 for the wool in 6 months’ time, though are concerned that the US$/NZ$ exchange rate might change adversely. The following market information is available: Current spot exchange rate US$1/ NZ$1.49 Forward rate (6 months) US$1/ NZ$1.42 NZ borrowing rate 2.00% p.a.…arrow_forwardPlease help me with this question: IrishCo, a manufacturing corporation resident in Ireland, distributes products through a U.S. office. Current-year taxable income from such sales in the United States is $12,000,000. IrishCo's U.S. office deposits working capital funds in short-term certificates of deposit with U.S. banks. Current-year interest income from these deposits is $150,000. IrishCo also invests in U.S. securities traded on the New York Stock Exchange. This investing is done by the home office. For the current year, IrishCo has realized capital gains of $300,000 and dividend income of $50,000 from these stock investments. Compute IrishCo's U.S. tax liability, assuming that the U.S.-Ireland income tax treaty reduces withholding on dividends to 15% and on interest to 5%. Assume a 21% U.S. tax rate. IrishCo's U.S. tax liability is $arrow_forwardMonday Inc is a wholly 100% subsidiary to Malaysian company, Blue Bhd. Monday Inc is located in a foreign country and operates a mine. The income of Monday Inc is denominated and settled in dinars. The output of the mine is routinely traded in dinars and its price is determined initially by local supply and demand. Monday pays 30% of its costs and expenses in dollars with the remainder being incurred locally and settled in dinars. Monday’s management has a considerable degree of authority and autonomy in carrying out the operations of Monday and is not dependent upon group companies for finance. Required: Discuss and apply the principles set out in MFRS 121 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates in order to determine the functional currency of Monday Inc.arrow_forward
- Facts of the case: ABC, a US based corporation that manufactures and sells garden equipment worldwide, has a 100% owned subsidiary operating in the United Kingdom. The subsidiary has an independent management that decides which of the products produced by the ABC parent it will sell and at what price. The subsidiary also produces and sells its own brand garden equipment locally. Sixty percent of the subsidiary's sales are denominated in sterling (the local currency) associated with selling its own brand garden equipment and 40% are in US dollars (selling products produced by ABC). The subsidiary has local employees who are paid monthly in sterling and which represents 70% of the subsidiary operating expenses. To finance its operations, the subsidiary borrows $10 million (US dollars) from its US parent with US dollar interest due @ 6 % annually, with interest payable quarterly and the full principal due in 5 years. The subsidiary has borrowed an equivalent amount of pound…arrow_forwardMikco, a foreign corporation, owns 100% of Flagco, a U.S. corporation. Mikco manufactures a wide variety of flags for worldwide distribution. Flagco imports Mikco’s flags for resale in the United States. Flagco’s average financial results for the last three years are as follows: Sales.................................................... $20 million Cost of goods sold............................. (15 million) Operating expenses.............................. (4 million) Operating profit................................... $ 1 million Flagco’s CFO has decided to use the comparable profits method to assess Flagco’s exposure to an IRS transfer pricing adjustment by testing the reasonableness of Flagco’s reported operating profit of $1 million. An analysis of five comparable uncontrolled U.S. distributors indicates that the ratio of operating profits to sales is the most appropriate profitability measure. After adjustments have been made to account for material differences between Flagco…arrow_forward) USCo purchases widgets in the United States and sells them abroad with title on resale passing in the foreign country whose operations sold the widget. In addition to earning $100,000 of taxable income from U.S. sales, USCo earns $100,000 of taxable income from Canadian sales by its Canadian branch that is subject to tax in Canada at a 25% rate. USCo also has a Hong Kong branch that earns $100,000 of taxable income that is subject to Hong Kong tax at a 15% rate. Any facts stated in an individual question relate solely to that question. Q. If the $100,000 of taxable income earned by the Hong Kong branch constitutes interest income from various Hong Kong banks on which the Hong Kong branch incurs withholding tax at a rate of 15%, what is USCo's foreign tax credit? (a) $0. (b) $40,000. (c) $36,000. (d) $42,000. (e) $15,000 in the branch limitation category and $21,000 in the passive limitation category.Q. If USCo manufactures the…arrow_forward
- Billabong Fashion is based in Melbourne, Australia. Billabong Fashion has a subsidiary in Shanghai that generates RMB85 million in annual sales. Any earnings generated by the subsidiary are reinvested to support its operations. Belle Fashion is the close competitor of Billabong Fashion. Belle Fashion is a local Australian company located in Japan with annual export sale to Malaysia of about MYR 45 million. Based on the information provided, which firm is subject to a higher degree of translation exposure? Justify your answer with thorough explanation on both companies.arrow_forward1. ForCo, a corporation that is incorporated in a foreign country that does not have a treaty with the United States, plans to conduct manufacturing, marketing, and sales operations in the United States. These U.S. operations produce $5 million of earnings & profits in Year 1. Assume further that the U.S. operations will have a net worth of $17 million at the beginning of Year 1 and $20 million at the end of Year 1. During Year 2, the U.S. branch does not produce any earnings & profits and its net worth is $20 million at the beginning of the year and $10 million at the end of the year. For branch profits tax purposes in Year 1, the dividend equivalent amount (“DEA”) for the U.S. branch is as follows: a. $1.5 million. b. $2.0 million c. $10 million. $20 million. d. $25 million. 2. For branch profits tax purposes in Year 2, the DEA for the U.S. branch is as follows: a. $2 million. b. $3 million. c. $10 million. d. $20 million. e. $25 million.…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
