Case summary:The person JP created a soft-drink and named it C on the basis of coca-leaves and kola nuts that were used as ingredients in the drink. The company CC prevented the American company K and others from using its trademark in their products. The company K of America and other companies alleged that CC trademark was a fraudulent misrepresentation because the name of the product represented that product contains cocaine, which it no longer did.
To Find: The result of the case if the company CC had tried to make the common people believe that its products contained cocaine.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 8 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
- What were the sources and causes the problems in the first place? Explain.arrow_forwardPlease defend your position on the following statement: “The Statute of Frauds is old law that has outlived its usefulness and should be abandoned by today’s courts.” Be sure to state your position and support it with at least THREE points. pls note this is business law question!arrow_forwardThe general rule is that there is no duty to rescue another, absent a special relationship. Was the Court correct to impose a duty on the psychologist to a third party? What are the implications for a society where legal duties to rescue are enforced? What are your refined ideas about the relationship of law and ethical behavior?arrow_forward
- How many of the following are not a "tax" death benefits dependant of a deceased person: the deceased person’s spouse the deceased person’s former spouse the deceased person’s child under 18 years of age any person with whom the deceased person had an “interdependency relationship” just before he or she died; and any person who was financially dependent on the deceased just before the deceased person died? 0 1 2 3 4 5arrow_forwardDid the California Supreme Court correctly decide the Kasky case? Why or why not?arrow_forwardHow important is it for an organization to have a code of conduct that defines fraudulent behavior, and what happens to those individuals who commit such acts?arrow_forward
- 1. What is an Ultra Vires act? How is it different from an illegal act? Explainarrow_forwardare there ever circumstances in which corporate spying is ethical if so what are theyarrow_forwardShould individual employees or managers of a corporation be penalized (through fines or imprisonment) if they are responsible when their companies commit illegal acts? For example, if a company is fined for polluting, should the people who authorized and carried out the pollution be fined as well? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Reactions to the case of Ardito et al. v. City of Providence, Rhode Island. What is the Lessons Learned?arrow_forwardUse Australian Legislation to answer this please, thank you. Maria is a sixteen-year-old who has a significant learning disability. Until recently, she was living with her mother Ellen. One night Ellen and Maria got into a verbal fight and Ellen said “do you want to take this outside.” Maria took Ellen up on her offer and they stepped outside and had a fist fight. Both Maria and Ellen landed punches. Indeed, one punch hit Maria in the face. This infuriated Maria and she picked up a metal pole lying nearby and said, “If you weren’t my mother, I would kill you with this pole.” Maria promptly left Ellen’s residence and sought to rent a place of her own. She met Julian at a café and told him about the fight. Julian could obviously see Maria had a disability. Julian told Maria he had a place she could rent but it would cost $400 per week. All Julian had was a cockroach infested shed in his back yard which was completely unsuitable for anyone to live in. Asking no questions, Maria signed a…arrow_forwardin united states supreme court through (22 term October 2022-present) the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith case what is it about and why was it important and why should people choose that particular case? Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmitharrow_forward