Loose Leaf Microeconomics with Connect Access Card
20th Edition
ISBN: 9781259287084
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean Masaki Flynn Dr.
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 1P
To determine
The difference between benefits in percentage and benefits in absolute dollar.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria, and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the selling price of each is $745,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel.
Willingness and Ability to Purchase
(Dollars)
Alyssa
720,000
Brian
690,000
Crystal
680,000
Nick
900,000
Rosa
810,000
Tim
770,000
Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply.
Alyssa
Brian
Crystal
Nick
Rosa
Tim
Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a price of $732,500. This fourth parcel _____________be sold…
. Jenna and Walter are on a road trip across the country. They both say that they get 25 utils from peanut butter sandwiches and 25 utils from trail mix. Knowing this, we can conclude that Jenna a. gets the same satisfaction from peanut butter sandwiches that Walter does. b. gets more satisfaction from trail mix than Walter does. c. gets more satisfaction from trail mix than from peanut butter sandwiches. d. and Walter are both indifferent between other food than peanut butter sandwiches or trail mix. e. and Walter will consume the same amount of peanut butter sandwiches and trail mix on the road trip.
If the consumer thinks that (x₁,x2) is at least as good as (y₁.42) and that (y₁y2) is at least as good as (x₁,x2), we can conclude that (look at the following options)
Chapter 8 Solutions
Loose Leaf Microeconomics with Connect Access Card
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that in the country of England, two goods can be produced on available agricultural land: wine and wool. Suppose that the opportunity costs of production are constant, so that the PPF is a straight line. Further, when all resources are devoted to wine production, England can produce 200 (thousand) barrels. When all resources are devoted to wool production, England can produce 400 (thousand) bushels of wool. What are the opportunity costs in England of producing a barrel of wine? Type your numeric answer and submitarrow_forwardCite three examples of recent decisions that you made in which you, at least implicitly, weighed marginal cost and marginal benefit.arrow_forwardBart and Lisa are both optimizing consumers in the market for shirts and hats, where they pay $100 for a shirt and $50 for a hat. Bart buys 8 shirts and 4 hats, while Lisa buys 6 shirts and 12 hats. From this information, ignoring the minus sign, we can infer that Bart's marginal rate of substiution is _________ hats per shirt, while Lisa's is __________ hat's per shirtarrow_forward
- Suppose Musashi buys a new tool that enables him to produce twice as many tea towels per hour as before, but it doesn't affect his ability to produce cutting boards. Use the green points (triangle symbol) to plot his new PPF on the previous graph. Because he can now make more tea towels per hour, Musashi's opportunity cost of producing cutting boards is _______ it was previously. higher than lower than the same asarrow_forwardWe learned that we can use choice between a gamble over someone's best and worst outcomes and getting an outcome of interest (like getting pizza) for certain as a way to assign numeric values to utility (on a scale of 0 to 1). Using this method, if you are indifferent between the following: A gamble that has a 0.3 chance of your best possible outcome (and no lower chance), and a 0.7 chance of your worst possible outcome. Getting pizza for certain. it means that your utility for getting pizza is:arrow_forwardConsider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves one year of life at a cost of $10,000. Treatment 2 saves ten years of life at a cost of $1,000,000. Which treatment is more cost-effective? Why? Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves six years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $90,000. Treatment 2 saves three years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $60,000. Which treatment is preferred from a cost utility analysis perspective? Suppose Jay has been experiencing back pain and that there are two options for back pain: Treatment Regimen Total Cost Pain Reduction Do nothing $0 0 units Cortisone injections $600 30 units Calculate the ICER between cortisone injections and doing nothing. Jay says he is willing to pay $10 for a per unit of pain reduction. Should he choose cortisone injections? Another treatment is discovered. It costs $700 and reduces pain by 25 units. Should he choose the new treatment?arrow_forward
- Suppose that Ciana is deciding whether or not to buy a pair of sneakers that she has been researching online, and also the best place to make her purchase. Three different stores in the area sell the sneakers she likes, but some stores are more convenient for Ciana to reach than others. One option is her local shoe store located only 15 minutes away from where she works, where they charge a marked-up price of $124 for the sneakers: Store Travel Time Each Way Price of a Sneakers (Minutes) (Dollars per sneakers) Local Shoe Store 15 124 Different Neighborhood in Town 30 103 Rural Outlet 60 70 Ciana earns an hourly wage of $30 at her job. In order to purchase her sneakers she will have to take time off work, so each hour away from her job costs her $30 in lost income. Assume that Ciana’s travel time is the same each way (to and from the store) and that it will take her 30 minutes once she reaches a store to complete her shopping. Assume throughout the question…arrow_forwardYou have k20per week to spend and two possible uses for this money,:telephoning friends back home and drinking coffee. Each hour of phoning costs k2 and each cup of coffee costs k1. Your utility functions U(X,Y)=XY,where X is the hours of phoning you do and Y the number of cups of coffee you drink. How much income per week will enable you to achieve the same quantities at the new process the ones you chose before? What income will enable you to attain the same utility as you did before.? Comment on your answer in the context of equivalent variation and compensation variationarrow_forwardSuppose that there are only 10 individuals in the economy each with the following utility function over present and future consumption: U (c1, c2) = c1 +C2, where ci is consumption today, and c2 is consumption tomorrow. Consumption tomorrow is less valued because people are impatient and prefer consuming now rather than later. Buying 1 unit of consumption today costs $1 today and buying 1 unit of consumption tomorrow costs $1 tomorrow. All individuals have income of $10 dollars today and no income tomorrow (because they will be retired) but they can save at the market interest rater> 0. How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.3? O. Less than half of it O. Exactly half of it O. The individual is indifferent between consuming today and saving O. More than half of it O. All of it O. None of it How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.5? O. Less than half of it…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning