Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780134492049
Author: Daron Acemoglu, David Laibson, John List
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 7P
(a)
To determine
The
(b)
To determine
The blanks mentioned in the table.
(c)
To determine
The nation that receives better deal with respect to trade.
(d)
To determine
Whether the nations N and F would ever trade for 60 coconuts and 20 fishes.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
According to the concept of comparative advantage, a good should be
produced in that nation where:
its domestic opportunity cost is least.
money is used as a medium of exchange.
its domestic opportunity cost is greatest.
the terms of trade are maximized.
Use comparative advantage, two countries and two goods, to explain why every country can be better off from international trade.
Suppose that Vietnam has the usual demand and supply curves for producing computers while Myanmar only has a typical demand curve, but it cannot produce computers. Use the three-panel diagram described in Week 2 lecture content to: Show in a set of graphs the free-trade equilibrium for computers. Indicate the equilibrium world price. How does this world price compare to the no-trade price in Vietnam? Indicate how many computers are traded under free international trade. Make sure to state the assumptions. Show graphically and explain the effects of the shift from no trade to free trade on surpluses in each country. Indicate the net national gain or loss from no trade to free trade for each country.
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
Chapter 8 Solutions
Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Which situation describes when mutually beneficial trade occurs? Group of answer choices Country A has a comparative advantage in producing strawberries. Country B has a comparative advantage in producing kiwis. Country A increases production of strawberries, and Country B increases production of kiwis. When Country A trades with Country B to obtain kiwis, and when Country B trades with Country A to obtain strawberries, both countries can benefit. Country A has a comparative advantage in producing strawberries. Country B has a comparative advantage in producing kiwis. Country A increases production of strawberries, and Country B decreases production of kiwis. When Country A trades with Country B to obtain kiwis, and when Country B trades with Country A to obtain strawberries, both countries can benefit. Country A has a comparative advantage in producing strawberries. Country B has a comparative advantage in producing kiwis. Neither country wants any of the produce they…arrow_forward*** Which of the following statements about production and trade is FALSE? 1. If a country has an absolute advantage in producing a good, then it also has the comparative advantage in the production of that good. II. Rich countries will generally have the comparative advantage in the production of all goods. III. If a country has the absolute advantage in the production of a good, then this country will be made better off by specializing in the production of that good. Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. b C d Specialization and Trade Q4 Homework Answered *** I only. I and II only. I, II and III. Ill only. Answered-Incorrect 1 attempt left Specialization and Trade Q9 Homework Unanswered X Your answer Resubmitarrow_forwardThe only two countries in the world, Alpha and Omega, face the following production possibilities frontiers. Assume that each country decides to use half of its resources in the production of each good. Show these point If these countries choose not to trade, what would be the total world production of popcorn and peanuts? Now suppose that each country decides to specialize in the good in which each has a comparative advantage. By specializing, what is the total world production of each product now? If each country decides to trade 100 units of popcorn for 100 units of peanuts, show on the graphs the gain each country would receive from trade. Label these points B.arrow_forward
- Which of the following best represents the benefit of trade based on comparative advantage? Large countries will benefit, but small countries will be better off without trade. Countries with better technology cannot benefit by trading with countries that have less technology. Small countries will benefit at a cost to larger countries. Each country can buy a good at a cost that is less than what is would cost to produce the good in the home country.arrow_forwardThe table below shows the maximum quantities of two goods that each country can produce. If the countries follow the principle of comparative advantage, which of the following is a potential benefit of trade? Vibranium (tons) Gold (tons) Wakanda 8 tons 2 tons Zamunda 2 tons 1 ton Group of answer choices Trade can allow each country to increase consumption beyond its production possibilities frontier. Trade can allow each country to shift its production possibilities frontier outward to higher levels of production. Trade can allow each country to become less vulnerable to the actions of the other country. All of these answers are correct.arrow_forwardCountry A can produce 20 units of wheat or 10 units of corn, while Country B can produce 15 units of wheat or 5 units of corn. Which country has the comparative advantage in producing wheat?arrow_forward
- What is the opportunity cost of a pair of shoes in Mexico? What is the opportunity cost of a pair of shoes in Nicaragua ? Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of shoes? Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of clothing? In this example, the country of Mexico should export ----------and import ----------------.arrow_forwardIn Country T, it takes 10 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 13.5 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. In Country Y, it takes 40 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 20 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. Country T has a comparative advantage over Country Y in cocoa. This follows the theory of comparative advantage, and we can say that engaging in free trade benefits all countries that participate in it; however, this conclusion stems from which of these inaccurate assumptions? Multiple Choice We have assumed constant returns to scale. We have assumed the prices of resources and exchange rates in the two countries are dynamic. We have assumed there are barriers to the movement of resources from the production of one good to another within the same country. We have assumed that agrarian nations do not specialize in producing particular products. We have assumed diminishing returns to specialization.arrow_forwardUse the table to answer the question. Apples Bananas Country A 500 1,500 Country B 800 1,600 If all resources of Country A and Country B were dedicated toward the production of either apples or bananas, the maximum production of each is summarized in the table above. In order for both countries to benefit from trade, which country should specialize in banana production, and why?arrow_forward
- Suppose that a worker in Freedonia can produce either 6 units of corn or 4 units of wheat per year, and a worker in Sylvania can produce either 4 units of corn or 6 units of wheat per year. Each nation has 10 workers. For many years the two countries traded, each completely specializing in producing the grain for which it has a comparative advantage. Now, however, war has broken out between them and all trade has stopped. Without trade, Freedonia produces and consumes 30 units of corn and 20 units of wheat per year. Sylvania produces and consumes 20 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. By how much has the combined yearly output of the two countries declined?arrow_forwardSuppose an economist develops an international trade model based on the assumption that there are only two countries and two goods. We can say that the model is worthless, since the actual world has many countries trading many goods. can be useful in the classroom, but has no use in the real world. can be useful only in situations involving two countries and two goods. can be useful in helping economists to understand the complex world of international trade involving many countries and many goods.arrow_forwardIf Argentina imports manufacturing parts from Guatemala, and Guatemala imports delivery trucks from Argentina, how could you best describe the pattern of trade? Group of answer choices Guatemala must have an absolute advantage in producing manufacturing parts. The opportunity cost of producing delivery trucks is higher in Argentina than it is in Guatemala. Argentina is protecting its delivery truck production industry. The opportunity cost of producing manufacturing parts in Argentina is higher than it is in Guatemala.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning