Concept explainers
COMMUNICATION CASE—FORWARD CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS
Palmetto Bug Extermination Corporation (PBEC), a U.S. company, regularly purchases chemicals from a supplier in Switzerland with the invoice price denominated in Swiss francs. PBEC has experienced several foreign exchange losses in the post year due to increases in the U.S. dollar price of the Swiss currency. As a result. Dewey Nukem, PBEC’s CEO, has asked you to investigate the possibility of using derivative financial instruments, specifically foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency options, to hedge the company’s exposure to foreign exchange risk.
Required
Draft a memo to CEO Nukem
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 9 Solutions
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING(LL) W/CONNECT
- If a U.S.-based company regularly purchases goods from foreign suppliers in Japan with the invoice price denominated in Japanese Yen. And if the U.S. company has experienced several foreign exchange losses due to the appreciation of the Japanese Yen. I am confused about which type of hedging instrument (Foreign currency forward contract or foreign currency option) the company should employ. Can you please help me to understand a justification for the selection? Maybe to illustrate, you can compare the advantages and disadvantages of using (Forward contracts) and (Options) to hedge foreign exchange risk.arrow_forwardAssume your firm has transferred you to Zurich Switzerland. You work in the triangular arbitrage division. View the following exchange rates. Is an arbitrage opportunity available? If not, explain why an opportunity does not exist. If so, from the Swiss point of view show how to exploit the opportunity. CHF .8976 = $1.00, $.0130 = INR 1.00, INR 92.7904 = CHF 1 Now say instead of working in Zurich, you were employed in Mumbai, India. How does that change your thinking on the arbitrage? PLEASE ANWSER CORRECTLY AND SHOW WORKarrow_forwardEXERCISE 1: Vegas Corp. is a U.S. firm that exports most of its products to Canada. It historically invoiced its products in Canadian dollars to accommodate the importers. However, it was adversely affected when the Canadian dollar weakened against the U.S. dollar. Since Vegas did not hedge, its Canadian dollar receivables were converted into a relatively small amount of U.S. dollars. After a few more years of continual concern about possible exchange rate movements, Vegas called its customers and requested that they pay for future orders with U.S. dollars instead of Canadian dollars. At this time, the Canadian dollar was valued at $.81. The customers decided to oblige since the number of Canadian dollars to be converted into U.S. dollars when importing the goods from Vegas was still slightly smaller than the number of Canadian dollars that would be needed to buy the product from a Canadian manufacturer. Based on this situation, has transaction exposure changed for Vegas Corp.? Has…arrow_forward