Auditing & Assurance Services with ACL Software Student CD-ROM
Auditing & Assurance Services with ACL Software Student CD-ROM
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781259197109
Author: Timothy J Louwers, Robert J. Ramsay Professor, David Sinason Associate Professor, Jerry R Strawser, Jay C. Thibodeau Associate Professor
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
Question
Book Icon
Chapter G, Problem 69EP

a.

To determine

Calculate the sampling interval and sample size.

a.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Monetary unit sampling (MUS): Monetary unit sampling (MUS) provides an assessment regarding the amount of misstatement in the balance of “accounts or class of transactions”.

The sample size: The sample size signifies the number of items that the audit team inspects within a population of interest. Four major aspects that impact the sample size in an “attributes sampling application” are as follows:

  • “Tolerable rate of deviation”.
  • “Sampling risk-risk of overreliance, or risk of assessing control risk too low.
  • “Expected population deviation rate”.
  • “Population size”.

Sampling interval: The samples units from a larger population are picked corresponding to an arbitrary beginning point however with a fixed interval. This fixed interval is referred as sampling interval.

The required sample size for the audit of inventory is as follows:

ParticularsSample sizeWorkings
Risk of incorrect acceptance10% 
Ratio of expected to tolerable misstatement33.33% ($50,000$150,000×100)
Tolerable misstatement as a percentage of population10% ($150,000$1,500,000×100)

Table (1)

Note: The tolerable misstatement as a percentage of population is 33.33 % which ranges from 30% (sample size 44) to 40% (sample size 58).

Calculate the sample size for the audit of Incorporation A’s inventory:

Step 1: Calculate the difference in sample size for an 8% tolerable misstatement and a 10% tolerable misstatement (5844=14items).

 Step 2: As the actual tolerable misstatement (33.33 percent) is one-third of the difference above [(33.33%40%)(40%  30%)] and multiply the difference calculated in step 1 (14 items) by one-third [0.667×14 items = 9.4item].

Note: Refer to EXHIBIT E.4.

Step 3: Adjust the sample size for the 30 percent tolerable misstatement by the result in step 2 to determine a sample size of 49items[58 items –9.4item = 49 items(Rounded)] . As a quick validation, note that because the tolerable misstatement is closer to 30 percent than 40 percent, the final sample size is closer to that shown for the 30 percent tolerable misstatement than the 40 percent tolerable misstatement.

Therefore, according to the above explanation, sample size is 49.

Note: Refer to exhibit GA.1.

Calculate the appropriate sampling interval:

Samplinginterval=RecordedbalanceSamplesize=$1,500,00049items=$30,612(rounded)

Therefore, the appropriate sampling interval is $30,612.

Note: If higher sample size is taken (58 items), then the sampling interval will be $25,862(1).

Working note:

(1)Calculate the appropriate sampling interval:

Samplinginterval=RecordedbalanceSamplesize=$1,500,00058items=$25,862(rounded)

b.

To determine

Re-perform the calculations in part (a) if Person W established a risk of incorrect acceptance of (1) 5 percent and (2) 20 percent and explain the relationship among the necessary level of the risk of incorrect acceptance, sample size and sampling interval.

b.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

(1)

In this case risk of incorrect acceptance is 5 percent.

The required sample size for the audit of inventory is as follows:

ParticularsSample sizeWorkings
Risk of incorrect acceptance5% 
Ratio of expected to tolerable misstatement33.33% ($50,000$150,000×100)
Tolerable misstatement as a percentage of population10% ($150,000$1,500,000×100)

Table (2)

Note: The tolerable misstatement as a percentage of population is 33.33 % which ranges from 30% (sample size 60) to 40% (sample size 81).

Calculate the sample size for the audit of Incorporation A’s inventory:

Step 1: Calculate the difference in sample size for an 8% tolerable misstatement and a 10% tolerable misstatement (8160=21items).

 Step 2: As the actual tolerable misstatement (33.33 percent) is one-third of the difference above [(33.33%40%)(40%  30%)] and multiply the difference calculated in step 1 (21 items) by one-third [0.667×21 items = 14.007item].

Note: Refer to EXHIBIT E.4.

Step 3: Adjust the sample size for the 30 percent tolerable misstatement by the result in step 2 to determine a sample size of 67items[81 items –14.007 item = 67 items(Rounded)] . As a quick validation, note that because the tolerable misstatement is closer to 30 percent than 40 percent, the final sample size is closer to that shown for the 30 percent tolerable misstatement than the 40 percent tolerable misstatement.

Therefore, according to the above explanation, sample size is 67.

Note: Refer to exhibit GA.1.

Calculate the appropriate sampling interval:

Samplinginterval=RecordedbalanceSamplesize=$1,500,00067items=$22,388(rounded)

Therefore, the appropriate sampling interval is $22,388.

Note: If higher sample size is taken (81 items), then the sampling interval will be $18,518(2).

Working note:

(2)Calculate the appropriate sampling interval:

Samplinginterval=RecordedbalanceSamplesize=$1,500,00081items=$18,518(rounded)

(2)

In this case risk of incorrect acceptance is 20 percent.

The required sample size for the audit of inventory is as follows:

ParticularsSample sizeWorkings
Risk of incorrect acceptance20% 
Ratio of expected to tolerable misstatement33.33% ($50,000$150,000×100)
Tolerable misstatement as a percentage of population10% ($150,000$1,500,000×100)

Table (3)

Note: The tolerable misstatement as a percentage of population is 33.33 % which ranges from 30% (sample size 28) to 40% (sample size 36).

Calculate the sample size for the audit of Incorporation A’s inventory:

Step 1: Calculate the difference in sample size for an 8% tolerable misstatement and a 10% tolerable misstatement (3628=8items).

 Step 2: As the actual tolerable misstatement (33.33 percent) is one-third of the difference above [(33.33%40%)(40%  30%)] and multiply the difference calculated in step 1 (8 items) by one-third [0.667×8items = 5.336item].

Note: Refer to EXHIBIT E.4.

Step 3: Adjust the sample size for the 30 percent tolerable misstatement by the result in step 2 to determine a sample size of 31items[36 items –5.336 item = 31 items(Rounded)] . As a quick validation, note that because the tolerable misstatement is closer to 30 percent than 40 percent, the final sample size is closer to that shown for the 30 percent tolerable misstatement than the 40 percent tolerable misstatement.

Therefore, according to the above explanation, sample size is 31.

Note: Refer to exhibit GA.1.

Calculate the appropriate sampling interval:

Samplinginterval=RecordedbalanceSamplesize=$1,500,00031items=$48,387(rounded)

Therefore, the appropriate sampling interval is $48,387.

Note: If higher sample size is taken (36 items), then the sampling interval will be $41,666(3).

Working note:

(3)Calculate the appropriate sampling interval:

Samplinginterval=RecordedbalanceSamplesize=$1,500,00036items=$41,666(rounded)

By evaluating the responses to (a) and (b), it seems that the risk of incorrect acceptance (RIA) is having an “inverse relationship” with sample size (n) and a “direct relationship” with the sampling interval (SI), as shown below (assuming interpolation):

Risk of incorrect acceptanceItemSampling interval
5%67$22,388
10%49$30,612
20%31$48,387

(Table 4)

c.

To determine

Ascertain the projected misstatement.

c.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Calculate the projected misstatement:

Auditing & Assurance Services with ACL Software Student CD-ROM, Chapter G, Problem 69EP

Figure (1)

Therefore, the amount of projected misstatement is $14,000.

Note: Part (c) is not related to parts (a) and (b), therefore projected misstatement is not calculated.

d.

To determine

Calculate the upper limit on misstatements.

d.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Calculate the incremental allowance:

Projected Misstatement

Incremental factor minus 1

(Refer to table 7)

Incremental Allowance
$6,400 x(3.89–2.31 – 1)=$3,712
$4,000x(5.333.89 – 1)=$1,760
$1,600x(6.69 –5.33 – 1)=$576
    $6,048

Table (5)

Note: “For every projected misstatement, whose recorded balance is smaller than the sampling interval, rank the projected misstatements in descending order depending upon the dollar amount”.

Calculate the basic allowance for sampling risk:

Allowanceforsamplingrisk}=Samplinginterval×Confidencefactor=$8,000×2.31=$18,480

Therefore, the basic allowance for sampling risk is $18,480.

Note: Confidence factor (2.31) is selected for 0 overstatement misstatements as these sampling intervals do not contain an overstatement error.

Calculate the upper limit on misstatements:

ParticularsAmount
Projected misstatement$14,000
Incremental allowance for sampling risk$6,048
Basic allowance for sampling risk$18,480
Upper limit on misstatements$38,528

Table (6)

Therefore, the upper limit on misstatements is $38,528.

Working note:

(4)Identify the Confidence Factors for Sample Evaluation:

Number of overstatement misstatementsRisk of incorrect acceptance  is 10%
 02.31
 13.89
 2 5.33
 3 6.69
 4 8.00

Table (7)

Note: Refer to exhibit GA.2.

e.

To determine

Re-perform the calculation in part (d) using a risk of incorrect acceptance of (1) 5 percent and (2) 20 percent and describe the relationship between the required level of risk of incorrect acceptance and the upper limit on misstatements.

e.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

(1)

In this case, risk of incorrect acceptance is 5%.

Calculate the incremental allowance:

Projected Misstatement

Incremental factor minus 1

(Refer to table 10)

Incremental Allowance
$6,400 x(4.75–3.00 – 1)=$4,800
$4,000x(6.304.75 – 1)=$2,200
$1,600x(7.76 –6.30 – 1)=$736
    $7,736

Table (8)

Note: “For every projected misstatement, whose recorded balance is smaller than the sampling interval, rank the projected misstatements in descending order depending upon the dollar amount”.

Calculate the basic allowance for sampling risk:

Allowanceforsamplingrisk}=Samplinginterval×Confidencefactor=$8,000×3=$24,000

Therefore, the basic allowance for sampling risk is $24,000.

Note: Confidence factor (3.00) is selected for 0 overstatement misstatements as these sampling intervals do not contain an overstatement error.

Calculate the upper limit on misstatements:

ParticularsAmount
Projected misstatement$14,000
Incremental allowance for sampling risk$7,736
Basic allowance for sampling risk$24,000
Upper limit on misstatements$45,736

 Table (9)

Therefore, the upper limit on misstatements is $45,736.

Working note:

(5)Identify the Confidence Factors for Sample Evaluation:

Number of overstatement misstatementsRisk of incorrect acceptance  is 5%
 0 3.00
 1 4.75
 2 6.30
 3 7.76
 4 9.16

Table (10)

Note: Refer to exhibit GA.2.

(2)

In this case, risk of incorrect acceptance is 20%.

Calculate the incremental allowance:

Projected Misstatement

Incremental factor minus 1

(Refer to table 13)

Incremental Allowance
$6,400 x(3.00–1.61 – 1)=$2,496
$4,000x(4.283.00 – 1)=$1,120
$1,600x(5.52 –4.28 – 1)=$384
    $4,000

Table (11)

Note: “For every projected misstatement, whose recorded balance is smaller than the sampling interval, rank the projected misstatements in descending order depending upon the dollar amount”.

Calculate the basic allowance for sampling risk:

Allowanceforsamplingrisk}=Samplinginterval×Confidencefactor=$8,000×1.61=$12,880

Therefore, the basic allowance for sampling risk is $12,880.

Note: Confidence factor (1.61) is selected for 0 overstatement misstatements as these sampling intervals do not contain an overstatement error.

Calculate the upper limit on misstatements:

ParticularsAmount
Projected misstatement$14,000
Incremental allowance for sampling risk$4,000
Basic allowance for sampling risk$12,880
Upper limit on misstatements$30,880

 Table (12)

Therefore, the upper limit on misstatements is $30,880.

Based on the above computations in (d) and (e), it seems that the risk of incorrect acceptance is having an inverse relationship with the upper limit on misstatements. For instance, the “upper limit on misstatements for a risk of incorrect acceptance of 5 percent is $45,736 and for a risk of incorrect acceptance of 20 percent, it is $30,880”.

Working note:

(1)Identify the Confidence Factors for Sample Evaluation:

Number of overstatement misstatementsRisk of incorrect acceptance  is 20%
 01.61
 1 3.00
 2 4.28
 36.02
 4 7.27

Table (13)

Note: Refer to exhibit GA.2.

f.

To determine

Explain the manner in which different levels of the risk of incorrect acceptance influence the likelihood of concluding that the account balance is fairly stated by using a risk of incorrect acceptance of (1) 5 percent, (2) 10 percent, and (3) 20 percent.

f.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

In all three examples, Person W could agree that the balance of accounts receivable is recorded fairly as the upper limit on misstatements is lower than the tolerable misstatement of $150,000($1,500,000 x 0.10 = $150,000) . Even though, the upper limit on misstatements increases as the risk of incorrect acceptance decreases, a lower risk of incorrect acceptance will provide Person W a lower probability of determining that the account balance is stated in a fair manner

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Chapter G Solutions

Auditing & Assurance Services with ACL Software Student CD-ROM

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:MCG
Text book image
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337272094
Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Text book image
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619202
Author:Hall, James A.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Text book image
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...
Accounting
ISBN:9780134475585
Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781259722660
Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781259726705
Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education