Authorship

account of Creation traces Genesis 1 to the Priestly source during or after the Exile and Genesis 2 to the Jahwist source of the 9th century. While the passages seem to be describing the same story, the inconstancies create a problem for single authorship. The lack of continuity in literary style of the Pentateuch also offers evidence for the division into documents. Each document seems to carry its own traits and characteristics that define it from another document. For example, the J document features

skyscraper, continues to influence modern architecture in much the same way that a book can convey its knowledge for many years. To begin, I contend that authorship is not restricted to include only those who put pen to paper and create using words. Authorship is the creation of any thing or idea, which may or may not be published. This explanation of authorship is far broader than the conventional definition, but it fits much more closely to the intentional meaning of someone who creates. The lines of the

congresses. Authorship Requirements Circassia, from time to time, may collaborate and work with external Health Care Professionals (HCPs) to assist in publishing or presenting the results of Circassia-sponsored trial in accordance with the requirements below. Circassia’s requirements for authorship aligns with the ICMJE authorship criteria. As such, an author (internal employee or external HCP) must make substantial contributions to the publication as defined by the following ICMJE authorship criteria:

Carson and Moo make the reader aware of the authorship dispute regarding Ephesians. They point to seven arguments that support the traditional view that Paul wrote it. Likewise, they then draw attention to five argument used by modern scholars to deny Pauline authorship. After the controversies surrounding authorship are covered Carson and Moo move on to another controversy. The section tiled “Destination” is where it is found.

instance, “No Elizabethan documents support the claim that Shakespeare's plays and poems were written by someone else, or that the actor Shakespeare was not the author Shakespeare.” (shakespeare-online.com) Clearly, the evidence doubting Shakespeare’s authorship has no clear backing emanating from the Elizabethan period when Shakespeare was alive rather it was a theory started well after Shakespeare’s passing. A more specific counter argument concentrates on the number one alternate to William Shakespeare

Gospel of John This essay will show contrasts in views on the Gospel of John regarding authorship,dates, and the relationship between John's Gospel and the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Some comparison of thought, concerning composition and life setting, will also be presented. The majority of the information that we have today, describing the earthly ministry of Jesus Christ, is contained in the four

has existed under a cloud of suspicion. It has been under suspicion about its authorship, authenticity and place in the canon. Many people view(ed) James as a subcanonical or noncanonical text. Some may say that James does not look like a letter due to it not being addresses to anyone that there are no personal remarks, no greetings or directions and there are little personal interactions with the church. The authorship of the book of James has been fought over and debated by scholars for years

invalid statements (Ollson, J, 2008, pg. 3.) However, with forensic linguistics having only recently ‘matured’ as a method of analysis, it is now customary for investigators to consider these various possible areas within their research, such as authorship comparison and the concept of plagiarism within texts. Therefore, in a world where Forensic Linguistics is used as a form of investigation into real-life incidents, it is of upmost importance to underpin its validity. The inclusion of real-world

The three alternative proposals to John’s authorship Johannine Letters introduced by Köstenberger and colleagues are (1) an unknown elder in the so-called "Johannine community"; (2) a follower of the apostle John, and (3) the legendary "John the elder" in Asia Minor. There are two ways to examine the evidence of John’s authorship. The first manner is to view the text internally, or ways in which the authorship of John is supported within the writing. The second of which is to approach the text

The debate of the true authorship of Shakespeare is one that has been argued for centuries. While there are various theories to suggest that William Shakespeare, the man from Stratford on Avon was not the true author of the plays produced within his lifetime, one theory in particular seems to hold the most concrete evidence. The authorship theory about Edward de Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford seems to have the most historical evidence proving that he is the writer of the plays and sonnets under