Motivational Interviewing Essay

This can be achieved through motivational interviewing. A randomized controlled trial compared teenagers who received 12 months of motivational interviewing visits versus a control group receiving only “supportive” visits for 12 months (Channon et al., 2007). The group that received the motivational interviewing had an average hemoglobin A1c decrease from 9.3% to 8.7%; this improvement was maintained at 12 months and 24

During the interview I did not summarize until the very end. However, at the end of the conversation I briefly summarized what he had told me about his dilemma with his degree and the progress he told me he was making on working through his ambivalence. Shortly thereafter we got up and left the Veterans Resource Center and we both shook hands and thanked each other for the dialogue. Furthermore, he assured me I helped him bring awareness to his options and the importance of working through the issue

Motivational Interview Motivational interviewing is a method that helps a client find an internal motivation to make a life change (Motivational Interviewing, 2018). It can be used for many different things including, smoking, drug addiction, alcoholism, health problems, obesity, and many more. It is normally a method of interviewing that is done by a physician or a counselor. This type of interviewing is geared toward helping an individual see the problem and become motivated to make healthier lifestyle

therapy techniques I will like to learn and develop with the teen who had the dual diagnosis is motivational interviewing and Family therapy, due to the adoptive mother is involved in the child lived the family therapy will help with the communication and the issues they are having. I have not experience working with teens with dual diagnosis. I need to develop techniques in how to apply Motivational

with this thought, however, it was in a different context. I was always under the impression that once an individual had suffered enough as a result of their addiction, change would occur. However, Miller (2012) provided sound examples of the motivational process and how and why it is key in an individual’s decision to abstain from substances. It has been my experience that when working with individuals suffering from substance abuse, motivation is often one of the biggest hurdles

alcohol and drugs. Individuals are always searching for treatment that will be beneficial to them. Clients want counseling to focus on them, instead of focusing on their addictions. Motivational interviewing

Concerns about addictions and drug use have been an ongoing battle for several years, especially for adolescents. There are still controversies about how and why an individual becomes addicted to a substance. Family members and loved ones of the addicted individual continue to ask why this individual continuously chooses to go back to the drug, no matter what the consequences are. To this day, research has opened our eyes to new possibilities, new explanations, and new interventions in order to help

enhance and be useful in my professional development are Motivational Interviewing (MI), Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), Socially Constructed Genograms, and Group Work. Motivational Interviewing is much more difficult to practice than anticipated and week 3, learning module G enhanced clarification, intention and appropriate use. The strategies and techniques of motivational interviewing by Sobell & Sobell (2008), Motivational Interviewing Strategies and Techniques: rationales and examples

ambivalence (Burke, 2011). Countless studies have shown that motivational interviewing is significantly more efficacious than no treatment at all (Burke, 2011). Lundahl and Burke discovered that motivation interviewing is as efficacious as other viable treatments for various addictive problems (as cited in Burke, 2011, p. 74). Motivational interviewing has been shown to be cost-effective (Burke, 2011). Furthermore, motivational interviewing as been shown to work with clients regardless of problem severity

down to the individual being ready to quit. Review of the Literature The purpose of this Randomized Control Trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing compared to Health Education and Brief Advice. Motivational Interviewing is thought to be more effective. The article “ A Randomized Trial of Motivational Interviewing” by Catley, Goggin, Harris, Richter, Williams, Patten, Resnicow, Ellerbeck, Bradley-Ewing, Lee, Moreno and Grobe (2016)