ACC 318 Module Two Assignment Template

.docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

318

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by CorporalVulture2245

Report
ACC 318 Module Two Assignment Template Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Debt-to-Assets Ratios 1. Calculate the quality of the debt-to-assets ratios for both companies. The Coca-Cola Company: Debt-to-Assets Ratio = ( Long termdebt + Short term debt ) Total Assets Debt-to-Assets Ratio = ( 40,125 + 2,183 ) 87,296 Debt-to-Assets Ratio ≈ 0.48 PepsiCo: Debt-to-Assets Ratio = Long term Debt Obligations Total Assets Debt-to-Assets Ratio = 40,370 92,918 Debt-to-Assets Ratio ≈ 0.43 2. Explain the quality of the debt-to-assets ratios for both companies. The quality of the debt-to-assets ratios for both The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo can be assessed based on the calculated values: The Coca-Cola Company : Debt-to-Assets Ratio ≈ 0.48 Debt-to-Assets Ratio ≈ 0.48 PepsiCo: Debt-to-Assets Ratio ≈ 0.43 Debt-to-Assets Ratio ≈ 0.43 Analysis: a) The Coca-Cola Company (Debt-to-Assets Ratio: 0.48): The debt-to-assets ratio of approximately 0.48 indicates that around 48% of The Coca- Cola Company's total assets are financed by debt. This suggests that a significant portion of the company's assets is funded through borrowed capital. A ratio below 1 indicates that the company relies more on equity to finance its assets than on debt. While the ratio is not excessively high, it's essential to consider industry benchmarks and the company's specific financial strategy. A higher ratio may indicate higher financial leverage and associated risks. b) PepsiCo (Debt-to-Assets Ratio: 0.43):
PepsiCo's debt-to-assets ratio of approximately 0.43 implies that around 43% of its total assets are financed by debt. Similar to The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo relies more on equity than debt for financing its assets. A ratio below 1 suggests a conservative approach to leverage. As with any financial metric, the quality of the ratio depends on industry norms, company objectives, and risk tolerance. Comparing this ratio to PepsiCo's historical values and industry benchmarks can provide additional context. General Interpretation : Generally, a lower debt-to-assets ratio is considered favorable as it signifies lower financial risk and a more conservative financial structure. However, the ideal ratio can vary by industry and business strategy. Some industries naturally carry higher debt levels. Investors and analysts often consider these ratios alongside other financial metrics and industry benchmarks to get a comprehensive view of a company's financial health and risk profile. It's important to note that debt ratios alone might not provide a complete picture, and a thorough analysis of a company's overall financial health, cash flow, and profitability is recommended for a comprehensive assessment. 3. Determine which company is more highly leveraged. To determine which company is more highly leveraged, we can compare their debt-to-assets ratios. The company with a higher debt-to-assets ratio is considered more leveraged. Let's compare the debt-to-assets ratios of The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo: 1. The Coca-Cola Company (Debt-to-Assets Ratio: 0.48) 2. PepsiCo (Debt-to-Assets Ratio: 0.43) Comparing the ratios, The Coca-Cola Company has a higher debt-to-assets ratio (0.48) compared to PepsiCo (0.43). Therefore, based on the debt-to-assets ratio, The Coca-Cola Company is more highly leveraged. Times-Interest-Earned Ratios 1. Calculate the times-interest-earned ratios for both companies. The Coca-Cola Company: Times-Interest-Earned Ratio = 8,997 1,437 6.26 PepsiCo: Times-Interest-Earned Ratio = 10,080 1,128 8.94
2. Explain the times-interest-earned ratios for both companies. Address the following questions in your response: A. Are the times-interest-earned ratios adequate? 1. The Coca-Cola Company (Times-Interest-Earned Ratio: 6.26): The times-interest-earned ratio of 6.26 indicates that The Coca-Cola Company’s operating income covers its interest expenses approximately 6.26 times. Adequacy depends on industry norms and the company’s risk tolerance. In general, a ratio above 1 suggests the ability to cover interest expenses, and 6.26 is considered reasonably adequate. 2. PepsiCo (Times-Interest-Earned Ratio: 8.94): PepsiCo’s times-interest-earned ratio of 8.94 suggests that its operating income can cover interest expenses approximately 8.94 times. This ratio is higher than The Coca-Cola Company’s, indicating a stronger ability to meet interest obligations. B. Is the times-interest-earned ratio greater than or less than 2.5? What does that mean for the companies' income? 1. The Coca-Cola Company (Times-Interest-Earned Ratio: 6.26): The times-interest-earned ratio for The Coca-Cola company is greater than 2.5. A ratio above 2.5 generally indicates that the company has a comfortable margin of safety to cover its interest expenses. In this case, with a ratio of 6.26, The Coca-Cola Company has a robust ability to meet its interest obligations. 2. PepsiCo (Times-Interest-Earned Ration: 8.94): PepsiCo’s times-interest-earned ration is also greater than 2.5. With a ratio of 8.94, PepsiCo exhibits a strong ability to cover its interest expenses, indicating a healthy financial position. C. Can the company afford the interest expense on a new loan? 1. The Coca-Cola Company (Times-Interest-Earned Ratio: 6.26): With a times-interest-earned ratio of 6.26, The Coca-Cola Company demonstrates a strong ability to afford the interest expense on a new loan. The ratio suggests a substantial margin of safety, indicating that the company’s operating income is more than sufficient to cover both existing and potential future interest expenses. 2. PepsiCo (Times-Interest-Earned Ratio: 8.94): PepsiCo, with a times-interest-earned ratio of 8.94, exhibits an even stronger ability to afford the interest expense on a new loan. The higher ratio implies a significant capacity to take on additional debt without jeopardizing its ability to meet interest obligations. Both The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, with their strong times-interest-earned ratios, can afford the interest expense on a new loan. The higher the ratio, the more comfortably the companies can manage additional debt, providing flexibility for strategic financing decisions. Before taking on new loans, companies typically assess their capital structure, cost of debt, and potential impact on future earnings.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help