CS - BWA DLPH Focus
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
New York University Stern School of Business *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Economics
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
Pages
17
Uploaded by DoctorPheasant3944
US Autos & Auto Parts BWA/DLPH: BWA/DLPH deal likely to close but not guaranteed Automobiles & Components | Earnings BWA
’s 1Q print provided multiple datapoints reminding us why it is one of the blue
-chip suppliers. A solid beat, with key highlights in robust outgrowth and better-than-feared decremental margins. Moreover, while the revised DLPH acquisition terms gave BWA a lower-
than-anticipated price cut, BWA importantly received a key concession with closing conditions on DLPH leverage. While overall 1Q was positive, we remain on the sidelines on BWA, as we see some risk for the powertrain product set (given product transition), and also as the DLPH acquisition creates a layer of uncertainty for BWA given the significant restructuring required for DLPH. For BWA we maintain our Neutral rating but raise our TP to $33 from $31. For DLPH we maintain our Neutral rating but raise our TP to $11 from $9. Revised deal exchange ratio lower than anticipated, reflects all-stock deal + new closing conditions:
BWA and DLPH revised the deal terms, through which they cured DLPH’s breach of the merger agreement through its revolver draw. The exchange ratio was reduced 5% - DLPH owners now receive 0.4307 shares of BWA for each share of DLPH vs prior 0.4534. The exchange ratio is lower than the 15-20% we and others anticipated, reflecting two points: 1. Because the deal is all-
stock, BWA’s reduced stock price implies a cheaper purchase price of DLPH; 2. BWA effectively gave up some price concession, in return receiving closing conditions on DLPH leverage which protect BWA and give it an out on the deal if macro significantly deteriorates. Deal still likely to close, but not a guarantee:
We believe the resolution of the breach significantly raises the likelihood that the BWA/DLPH deal is closed, and the base case is more clearly that the deal will close…yet we’d argue a closing is not necessarily a slam dunk. DLPH must meet the following closing conditions: 1. Gross revolver draw limit of $225mn; 2. Revolver draw of $115mn net of cash balance; 3. Net debt / EBITDA limit of 6.5x if deal close pre 9/30/20, or 7.5x if deal close on or after 10/1/20. Under our current modeling assumptions, we believe these conditions are feasible for DLPH. The new terms effectively imply a go-forward limit on aggregate DLPH cash burn of ~$220mn –
we model only ~$100mn in 2Q-4Q, and DLPH could see benefits through capex or working capital actions. Similarly, we believe the leverage limit is feasible, as we forecast leverage of only ~4.5x at end 3Q/4Q. And if need be, DLPH could take actions by cutting RD&E expense. However, the risk lies if there is a re-emergence of coronavirus disruption, which would drive incremental cash burn / elevated leverage at DLPH….meaning while the deal i
s likely to close, it is not fully guaranteed. 8 May 2020 Equity Research Americas | United States DISCLOSURE APPENDIX AT THE BACK OF THIS REPORT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS, LEGAL ENTITY DISCLOSURE AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. Research Analysts Dan Levy 212 325 4617 dan.levy@credit-suisse.com Robert Moon 212 325 7112 robert.moon@credit-suisse.com This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DANIEL ARNOLD at SEGANTII CAPITAL MGMT USA LLC
8 May 2020 US Autos & Auto Parts 2 BWA yet another supplier with robust 1Q outgrowth: The central highlight of BWA’s 1Q beat was robust outgrowth of ~11.5pts (organic growth -8% vs. mkt -20%), well in excess of the typical 6-7pts of quarterly outgrowth BWA has posted in recent years, and likely representing one of BWA’s best
-ever quarterly outgrowth results. The outgrowth is important, as growth is central to the BWA thesis. Outgrowth was especially pronounced in China (20pts+), with solid outgrowth also in Europe (~+12pts) and NA (~+9pts); among other things, BWA benefited from DCT in China, diesel in Europe, and turbos in NA. The outgrowth is credit to BWA’s backlog. However, we’d note that BWA is one of a n
umber of suppliers we’ve seen in 1Q posting robust outgrowth, including APTV, ALV, VC, and Valeo among others. It’s possible that 1Q supplier outgrowth may have in part benefited from OEMs stocking up on components into shutdowns to partially mitigate supply chain risks upon production restart (albeit BWA noted on the call that 1Q did not benefit from component overstocking). Near-term outgrowth may soften amid coronavirus upheaval.
Despite the robust 1Q outgrowth, BWA guided 2Q-4Q outgrowth to come down to 150-250bp. We see puts and takes on this. On one hand, we’re inclined to cite BWA’s track record in recent years of conservatism / setting the bar low. That, alongside mgmt. commentary of no major delays, implies upside to BWA’s guidance. However, we pref
er not to reflect the growth upside in our model, as we expect coronavirus disruption to limit the volumes of new launches –
hence limiting the amount of backlog (i.e. launch volumes in a global production outlook of sub-70mn units will be much less than launch volumes in a global production outlook of 90mn units). Indeed, BWA faced this trend in 2015 when outgrowth softened to ~1pt, in large part due to China and CV market volatility limiting launch volumes. Decremental margin showing benefits of restructuring actions:
One of the highlights of BWA’s 1Q beat was a better
-than-expected decremental margin of 26%, much better than the high 30% decremental margin we expected amid the upheaval, and helping to drive BWA’s 1Q margin beat. Looking at the segment res
ults provides a deeper understanding of BWA’s business –
Engine decremental margin of ~20% benefited from ongoing restructuring initiatives, while Drivetrain decremental margin of low 30% was driven by higher R&D expense in the segment (due to electrification investment). BWA noted that the sharp nature of the 2Q production decline will drive a higher decremental margin in the 30% range –
which we believe is a fair assumption for 2Q. Yet amid the trend of some suppliers posting better-than-expected decremental margins during the upheaval due to austerity measures, we wouldn’t rule out BWA 2Q decrementals coming in better than the guided 30% range. Intact dividend –
part BWA as a blue chip supplier, part deal positioning: BWA is unique amongst auto co’s, as it is part of a limited group of co’s that has maintained its dividend and has not drawn its revolver even in the face of the coronavirus upheaval. We would attribute this in part to BWA’s positioning as a blue chip supplie
r, but also in part due to deal positioning. On the first point, we give BWA credit as a higher quality auto co –
it expects to post positive FCF this year even in the face of the upheaval and it has one of the lowest leverage ratios amongst auto suppliers (only 0.6x net debt / TTM EBITDA end 1Q). Its dividend is a manageable ~$140mn annual commitment, and can be funded by FCF assuming BWA hits the mid-point of its revised FCF guide. It also has posted a solid track record of execution. Yet at the same time, we also think in part the dividend was maintained / the revolver was not drawn due to positioning in its breach negotiation with DLPH. Even though the negotiation is now complete, we nevertheless expect BWA to maintain the dividend and not draw the revolver.
This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DANIEL ARNOLD at SEGANTII CAPITAL MGMT USA LLC
8 May 2020 US Autos & Auto Parts 3 BorgWarner, Inc. Model Update; Raising target price, maintain Neutral rating BWA Target price (12M, US$) 33.00 Neutral
[V]
Auto Parts & Equipment BWA’s 1Q print provided multiple datapoints reminding us why it is one of the blue
-chip suppliers. A solid beat, with key highlights in robust outgrowth and better-than-feared decremental margins. Moreover, while the revised DLPH acquisition terms gave BWA a lower-than-anticipated price cut, BWA importantly received a key concession with closing conditions on DLPH leverage. While overall 1Q was positive, we remain on the sidelines on BWA, as we see some risk for the powertrain product set (given product transition), and also as the DLPH acquisition creates a layer of uncertainty for BWA given the significant restructuring required for DLPH. For BWA we maintain our Neutral rating but raise our TP to $33 from $31. Valuation and risks:
We raise our TP to $33 from $31; our revised TP applies a 5.1x multiple on FY’21 EBITDA of $1.45bn. We raise our estimate for FY’20 EBITDA to $1.08bn vs. prior $742mn. Key risks: prolonged production shutdown due to coronavirus, slower than expected global auto recovery post 2020, margin pressure, execution risk around restructuring and potential acquisition actions. Previous target price (12M, US$) 31.00 Price (7 May 20, US$) 27.84 52-week price range 46.31 - 19.73 Market cap (US$ m) 5,771.51 Enterprise value (US$ m) 6,826 [V] = Stock Considered Volatile (see Disclosure Appendix) Research Analysts Dan Levy 212 325 4617 dan.levy@credit-suisse.com Robert Moon 212 325 7112 robert.moon@credit-suisse.com Financial and valuation metrics Year 12/19A 12/20E 12/21E 12/22E EPS (CS adj.) (US$) 4.14 2.02 3.52 4.44 Prev. EPS (US$) - 0.83 2.58 3.65 P/E (x) 6.7 13.8 7.9 6.3 Revenue (US$ m) 10,168.0 8,177.5 10,058.7 11,421.2 EBIT (US$ m) 1,232.0 649.5 1,021.4 1,246.7 EBIT margin (%) 12.1 7.9 10.2 10.9 Organic growth (%) 0.7 -17.6 23.3 13.5 EV/EBITDA 4.1 6.3 4.5 3.6 Net debt (US$ m) 1,128 1,054 760 410 Number of shares (m) 207.31 IC (current, US$ m) 5,972.00 Net debt (Next Qtr., US$ m) 1,128.8 Dividend (current, US$) 0.68 Net debt/tot eq (Next Qtr.,%) 24.1 Source: Company data, Refinitiv, Credit Suisse estimates Share price performance On 07-May-2020 the S&P 500 INDEX closed at 2881.19Daily May09, 2019 - May07, 2020, 05/09/19 = US$38.58 Quarterly EPS Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2019A 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.17 2020E 0.77 -0.39 0.78 0.86 2021E - - - - This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DANIEL ARNOLD at SEGANTII CAPITAL MGMT USA LLC
8 May 2020 US Autos & Auto Parts 4 Figure 1: 1Q20 EPS Attribution Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates, FactSet 1Q20E
$mn ex per share data
Actual
CS Est.
Cons.
CS
Cons.
Y/Y
Q/Q
1Q19A
4Q19A
Key metrics
Revenue
2,279
1,878
2,008
401
271
(287)
(280)
2,566
2,559
Organic revenue growth
-8.1%
-23.4%
-19.8%
1527 bps
1170 bps
-482 bps
-1070 bps
-3.3%
2.6%
Adj. EBIT
234
80
165
154
69
(61)
(106)
295
340
EBIT Margin
10.3%
4.3%
8.2%
598 bps
205 bps
-123 bps
-302 bps
11.5%
13.3%
Adj. EPS
$0.77
$0.23
$0.48
$0.54
$0.29
-$0.23
-$0.40
$1.00
$1.17
FCF
146
50
64
96
82
223
97
(77)
49
Revenue
Engine
1,434
1,150
1,318
284
116
(164)
(99)
1,598
1,533
Drivetrain
860
744
839
116
21
(122)
(182)
982
1,042
Eliminations
(15)
(16)
1
(15)
(1)
1
(14)
(16)
Total
2,279
1,878
2,008
401
271
(287)
(280)
2,566
2,559
Y/Y Growth
Engine
-10.3%
-28.0%
-17.5%
1775 bps
729 bps
-339 bps
-973 bps
-6.9%
-0.5%
Drivetrain
-12.4%
-24.3%
-14.5%
1184 bps
210 bps
-310 bps
-1195 bps
-9.3%
-0.5%
Total Co
-11.2%
-26.8%
-21.7%
1562 bps
1056 bps
-334 bps
-1060 bps
-7.8%
-0.6%
Y/Y Organic Growth
Engine
-6.4%
-23.7%
1729 bps
-459 bps
-983 bps
-1.8%
3.4%
Drivetrain
-10.6%
-22.3%
1171 bps
-497 bps
-1213 bps
-5.6%
1.5%
Total Co
-8.1%
-23.4%
-19.8%
1527 bps
1170 bps
-482 bps
-1070 bps
-3.3%
2.6%
Adj. EBIT Engine
208
105
167
103
41
(33)
(56)
241
264
Drivetrain
63
29
64
34
(1)
(42)
(73)
105
136
Eliminations
(37)
(54)
17
(37)
14
23
(51)
(60)
Total Co
234
80
165
154
69
(61)
(106)
295
340
Adj. EBIT Margin
Engine
14.5%
9.1%
12.7%
538 bps
185 bps
-58 bps
-272 bps
15.1%
17.2%
Drivetrain
7.3%
4.0%
7.6%
337 bps
-28 bps
-337 bps
-573 bps
10.7%
13.1%
Total Co
10.3%
4.3%
8.2%
598 bps
205 bps
-123 bps
-302 bps
11.5%
13.3%
Below the line / Other
Equity income
5
9
(4)
(4)
(2)
9
7
Net interest expense
10
9
13
1
(3)
(1)
1
11
9
Other expense / (income)
2
0
2
(7)
0
9
Pretax Income
227
80
144
147
83
(66)
(102)
293
329
Tax
60
21
37
39
23
(14)
(9)
74
69
Tax rate
26.6%
26.5%
25.7%
8 bps
84 bps
118 bps
556 bps
25.4%
21.0%
Noncontrolling interest, other
8
12
(4)
8
(3)
(9)
11
17
Adj. Net income
159
47
107
112
52
(49)
(84)
208
243
Adj. EPS
$0.77
$0.23
$0.48
$0.54
$0.29
($0.23)
($0.40)
$1.00
$1.17
Shares Outstanding
206
205.5
0.7
-0.9
-0.7
207
207
Free Cash Flow
146
50
64
96
82
223
97
(77)
49
Delta vs.
Change
Historicals
This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DANIEL ARNOLD at SEGANTII CAPITAL MGMT USA LLC
8 May 2020 US Autos & Auto Parts 5 Figure 2: Summary Model (Income Statement) Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Income Statement, $mn (ex per share data)
1Q19
2Q19
3Q19
4Q19
1Q20
2Q20E
3Q20E
4Q20E
2017
2018
2019
2020E
2021E
2022E
2023E
Revenue
2,566
2,551
2,492
2,559
2,279
1,250
2,303
2,346
9,799
10,531
10,168
8,177
10,059
11,421
12,235
Gross Profit
519
513
524
545
447
29
431
446
2,119
2,231
2,101
1,353
1,927
2,275
2,479
Gross Margin
20.2%
20.1%
21.0%
21.3%
19.6%
2.3%
18.7%
19.0%
21.6%
21.2%
20.7%
16.6%
19.2%
19.9%
20.3%
Operating Income, Non-GAAP
295
303
294
340
234
(74)
234
255
1,217
1,298
1,232
650
1,021
1,247
1,378
Adj. operating margin
11.5%
11.9%
11.8%
13.3%
10.3%
-5.9%
10.2%
10.9%
12.4%
12.3%
12.1%
7.9%
10.2%
10.9%
11.3%
Net interest expense
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
65
54
52
52
52
52
52
Pretax Income, Non-GAAP
2,861
2,854
2,786
2,899
2,513
1,176
2,537
2,601
11,016
11,829
11,400
8,827
11,080
12,668
13,612
Provision for taxes, Non-GAAP
74
73
74
69
63
(8)
62
68
340
286
291
186
270
331
366
Effective tax rate
25%
25%
26%
21%
27%
10%
27%
27%
28%
22%
24%
29%
26%
26%
26%
Net income, Non-GAAP
208
208
199
243
160
(81)
161
177
822
941
857
416
717
891
990
Net Margin
8.1%
8.1%
8.0%
9.5%
7.0%
-6.5%
7.0%
7.5%
8.4%
8.9%
8.4%
5.1%
7.1%
7.8%
8.1%
Shares Outstanding, Diluted
207
207
206
207
206
206
206
206
212
210
207
206
204
201
197
EPS, Non-GAAP
$1.00
$1.00
$0.96
$1.17
$0.77
($0.39)
$0.78
$0.86
$3.88
$4.49
$4.14
$2.02
$3.52
$4.44
$5.04
Dividend per share
$0.17
$0.17
$0.17
$0.17
$0.17
$0.17
$0.17
$0.17
$0.59
$0.68
$0.68
0.68
$ 0.68
$ 0.68
$ 0.75
$ Payout ratio
17.0%
16.9%
17.6%
14.5%
22.0%
-43.3%
21.8%
19.8%
15.2%
15.1%
16.4%
33.7%
19.3%
15.3%
14.9%
Depreciation and amortization
107
107
110
115
112
106
106
107
408
431
439
431
430
451
483
EBITDA, Non-GAAP
402
410
404
455
346
33
340
362
1,625
1,729
1,671
1,081
1,451
1,698
1,861
Adj. EBITDA margin
15.7%
16.1%
16.2%
17.8%
15.2%
2.6%
14.8%
15.4%
16.6%
16.4%
16.4%
13.2%
14.4%
14.9%
15.2%
Y/Y Change
Revenue
-7.8%
-5.3%
0.5%
-0.6%
-11.2%
-51.0%
-7.6%
-8.3%
8.0%
7.5%
-3.5%
-19.6%
23.0%
13.5%
7.1%
Adj. EBIT
-13.0%
-11.1%
0.3%
4.8%
-20.7%
-124.3%
-20.4%
-24.9%
9.3%
6.6%
-5.1%
-47.3%
57.3%
22.1%
10.5%
Adj. EBITDA
-10.3%
-8.9%
0.8%
5.8%
-13.9%
-92.0%
-15.8%
-20.5%
8.0%
6.4%
-3.4%
-35.3%
34.3%
17.0%
9.6%
Net Income
-10.4%
-16.2%
-4.7%
-4.0%
-23.1%
-139.0%
-19.0%
-27.2%
16.8%
14.6%
-9.0%
-51.4%
72.3%
24.3%
11.1%
EPS
-8.8%
-15.0%
-3.6%
-3.3%
-22.8%
-139.1%
-19.0%
-27.0%
18.7%
15.7%
-7.8%
-51.3%
74.3%
26.2%
13.4%
This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DANIEL ARNOLD at SEGANTII CAPITAL MGMT USA LLC
8 May 2020 US Autos & Auto Parts 6 Figure 3: Summary Model (Segment Model) Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Segment Model, $mn
1Q19
2Q19
3Q19
4Q19
1Q20
2Q20E
3Q20E
4Q20E
2017
2018
2019E
2020E
2021E
2022E
2023E
Revenue
Engine
1,598
1,569
1,514
1,533
1,434
766
1,382
1,398
6,061
6,448
6,214
4,980
6,029
6,711
7,006
Drivetrain
982
998
993
1,042
860
499
936
962
3,790
4,141
4,015
3,257
4,090
4,770
5,289
Eliminations
(14)
(16)
(15)
(16)
(15)
(15)
(15)
(15)
(53)
(57)
(61)
(60)
(60)
(60)
(60)
Total
2,566
2,551
2,492
2,559
2,279
1,250
2,303
2,346
9,799
10,531
10,168
8,177
10,059
11,421
12,235
Revenue Growth, Y/Y
Engine
-6.9%
-6.3%
-0.1%
-0.5%
-10.3%
-51.2%
-8.7%
-8.8%
8.4%
6.4%
-3.6%
-19.9%
21.1%
11.3%
4.4%
Drivetrain
-9.3%
-3.5%
1.6%
-0.5%
-12.4%
-50.0%
-5.7%
-7.7%
7.6%
9.3%
-3.0%
-18.9%
25.6%
16.6%
10.9%
Total
-7.8%
-5.3%
0.5%
-0.6%
-11.2%
-51.0%
-7.6%
-8.3%
8.0%
7.5%
-3.5%
-19.6%
23.0%
13.5%
7.1%
Organic Revenue Growth, Y/Y
Engine
-1.8%
-0.4%
4.6%
3.4%
-6.3%
-48.7%
-7.4%
-7.5%
7.7%
3.6%
1.3%
-17.6%
21.3%
11.3%
4.4%
Drivetrain
-5.6%
0.2%
4.1%
1.5%
-10.6%
-48.0%
-4.8%
-6.8%
13.9%
6.8%
-0.1%
-17.5%
25.8%
16.6%
10.9%
Total
-3.3%
-0.3%
4.4%
2.6%
-8.0%
-48.7%
-6.4%
-7.3%
10.1%
4.8%
0.7%
-17.6%
23.3%
13.5%
7.1%
Market weighted growth
-4.9%
-6.8%
-2.0%
-5.1%
-21.6%
-50.4%
-6.9%
-9.5%
0.3%
-1.3%
-4.8%
-24.4%
19.3%
6.5%
3.0%
Outgrowth vs market
162 bps
649 bps
640 bps
774 bps
1358 bps
173 bps
50 bps
226 bps
973 bps
608 bps
552 bps
679 bps
396 bps
708 bps
414 bps
Adj. EBIT
Engine
241
249
241
264
208
33
197
210
994
1,040
995
648
879
1,002
1,055
Drivetrain
105
102
100
136
63
(77)
71
82
449
476
443
139
322
445
522
Corporate/Other
(51)
(48)
(47)
(60)
(37)
(30)
(34)
(37)
(227)
(219)
(206)
(138)
(180)
(200)
(200)
Total Operating Income
295
303
294
340
234
(74)
234
255
1,217
1,296
1,232
650
1,021
1,247
1,378
Adj. EBIT Margin
Engine
15.1%
15.9%
15.9%
17.2%
14.5%
4.3%
14.3%
15.0%
16.4%
16.1%
16.0%
13.0%
14.6%
14.9%
15.1%
Drivetrain
10.7%
10.2%
10.1%
13.1%
7.3%
-15.4%
7.5%
8.6%
11.9%
11.5%
11.0%
4.3%
7.9%
9.3%
9.9%
Total Operating Margin
11.5%
11.9%
11.8%
13.3%
10.3%
-5.9%
10.2%
10.9%
12.4%
12.3%
12.1%
7.9%
10.2%
10.9%
11.3%
Memo: R&D
104
113
102
94
109
88
102
104
408
440
413
403
443
503
526
R&D as % of revenue
4.1%
4.4%
4.1%
3.7%
4.8%
7.0%
4.5%
4.5%
4.2%
4.2%
4.1%
4.9%
4.4%
4.4%
4.3%
This document is being provided for the exclusive use of DANIEL ARNOLD at SEGANTII CAPITAL MGMT USA LLC
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
specify the generic and specific stackeholders for a certain company
identify two stakes at least for each stakeholders
arrow_forward
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
arrow_forward
Please see attachment and type out the correct answer ASAP with proper explanation of the each option given. Thank you.
arrow_forward
tise or nột to advertise
Suppose that Fizzo and Pop Hop are the only two firms that sell orange soda. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each
company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises:
Pop Hop
Advertise Doesn't Advertise
Advertise
8, 8
15, 2
Fizzo
Doesn't Advertise
2, 15
11, 11
For example, the upper right cell shows that if Fizzo advertises and Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo will make a profit of $15 million, and Pop Hop will
make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Fizzo and Pop Hop are both profit-maximizing firms.
million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $
million if Pop Hop does not
If Fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $
advertise.
million if Pop Hop does not
million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $
If Fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $
advertise.
TE Don Uenad orticoc Fizze makoc a hiabo nrefit RS R choeces
acer
arrow_forward
Question 2
arrow_forward
Mooney Corporation has acquired 150 machines in a business combination. Mooney does not intend to use these machines so it is required to recognize these items at fair value. Assume that Mooney has access to 3 different geographical markets (Northwest, Southwest, and Midwest). The Northwest market has legal restrictions and will take at least 6 months to obtain approval to sell the machines in the Northwest. The markets in the Southwest and Midwest can be accessed immediately.
Volumes and prices are listed below
Market
Price
Entity Specific Volume
Market Volume
Northwest
$42,000
20%
45%
Southwest
$52,000
45%
15%
Midwest
$49,000
35%
40%
Which market should Mooney Corporation use to determine the fair value of the machines?
arrow_forward
Please correct answer and don't use hand rating and don't use Ai solution
arrow_forward
Wiebe Trucking, Inc., is planning a new warehouse to serve the western United States. Denver, Santa Fe, and Salt Lake City are under consideration. For each location, annual fixed costs (rent, equipment, and insurance) and average variable costs per shipment (labor, transportation, and utilities) are listed in the following table. Sales projections range from 550,000 to 600,000 shipments per year.
Location
Annual FixedCosts
Variable Costsper Shipment
Denver
Santa Fe
Salt Lake City
$5,000,000
$4,200,000
$3,500,000
$4.65
$6.25
$7.25
a. Plot the total cost curves for all the locations on a single graph. b. Which city provides the lowest overall costs?
arrow_forward
Develop an imaginatory mode of effective and strategic management development
program for XYZ company.
arrow_forward
The manufacturer of smart printers is trying to decide what price to set for its product. The demand and cost function are assumed to be as follows: P = 80 -2Q TC= 160 +50Q-1.5Q ²
arrow_forward
A contract of sale under CIF port of Okinawa, Incoterm 2020, was entered between a seller based in Vietnam and a buyer in Japan, for the sale of 500 tons of coffee. The goods were transported and unloaded at the port and kept at customs shed for inspection and payment of duties. The buyer was notified of the arrival of the merchandise and its location. Before the buyer picked up the goods, the customs shed (including the merchandise in it) was destroyed by fire. The buyer claims refund of the purchase price stating that she did not receive the goods. Is the seller responsible?
arrow_forward
state true or false if false correct it
arrow_forward
Janet Foster bought a computer and printer at Computerland. The printer had a $600 list price with a $100 trade discount and 2/10,
n/30 terms. The computer had a $1,600 list price with a 25% trade discount but no cash discount. On the computer, Computerland
offered Janet the choice of (1) paying $50 per month for 17 months with the 18th payment paying the remainder of the balance or (2)
paying 8% interest for 18 months in equal payments.
a. Assume Janet could borrow the money for the printer at 8% to take advantage of the cash discount. How much would Janet save?
(Use 360 days a year. Round your answer to the nearest cent.)
Janet's savings
b. On the computer, what is the difference in the final payment between choices 1 and 2? (Round your answer to the nearest cent.)
Difference final payment
Check my work
arrow_forward
Given the following minimum standards (cutoff points) Price = 3, Quality = 4, and Ease of use = 3, which of the following computers would be chosen using the conjunctive
decision rule?
Price
Quality
Ease of Use
Multiple Choice
Dell
HP
Samsung
HP
4
3
4
Dell Samsung
5
2
4
5
4
4
There's not enough information to decide.
None of these choices are correct.
arrow_forward
A. Calculate the difference in novs between the make and buy optiom. Express all cost as positive values in your calculations.
B should you continue to produce in house or accept the bid for taiwanese supplier?
arrow_forward
SPL Group is into mining, agricultural-based and forest-based products, supplying wood, coal, carbon black, tendu leaves, tobacco extracts, honey, herbal, tree-barks (such as cinnamon) and opiates to intermediaries who make cigars, cigarettes, toothpowder, anti-psychotic drugs, etc. The group firmly believes in the ‘Triple Bottom Line’ of 3Ps, creating value for all the stakeholders; Planet, People and then Profits.
SPL Group is committed to developing its business towards ecological, social and economic sustainability. All of these are recognized as shared responsibilities within the Group, enabling the continuous improvement of its operations.The company has initiated a multi-pronged approach to CSR within the organization.The ultimate objective is to see that each business decision takes into account its social impact and accordingly plans an intervention to mitigate the impacts arising out of that decision. It is equally important to ascertain that every activity done under CSR…
arrow_forward
Long tail keywords are
O search terms with lower volume than (tail end of the distribution)
search terms for niche product categories
search terms that produce a low conversion rate
search terms done on mobile devices
arrow_forward
Mercedes is assessing which of windshield suppliers provides a better environmental design for disassembly. Using the table below, select between PG Glass and Glass Unlimited.
PG Glass
Part
Glass
Steal frame
Rubber insulation
Glass Unlimited
Resale Revenue Recycling Revenue Processing Cost Disposal Cost
per Unit
per Unit
per Unit
per Unit
$11
3
1
Resale Revenue
per Unit
Part
Reflective glass
Aluminum frame
Rubber insulation
The revenue retrieval for PG Glass design is $(enter your response as a whole number).
$16
5
1
$9
1
Recycling Revenue
per Unit
$13
3
$7
2
1
Processing Cost
per Unit
$6
2
$3
1
1
Disposal Cost
per Unit
$2
1
2
arrow_forward
Based on past experience, a chemicals firm estimates that the cost of new capacity additions obeys the lawf(y) =.0205y58where y is measured in tons per year and f(y) in millions of dollars. Demand isgrowing at the rate of 3,000 tons per year, and the accounting department recommends a rate of 12 percent per year for discounting future costs.a. Determine the optimal timing of plant additions and the optimal size of eachaddition.b. What is the cost of each addition?c. What is the present value of the cost of the next four additions? Assume anaddition has just been made for the purposes of your calculation. (Refer toAppendix 1–A for a discussion of cost discounting.)
arrow_forward
Eastman Publishing Company is considering publishing a paperback textbook on spreadsheet applications for business. The fixed cost of manuscript preparation, textbook design,and production setup is estimated to be $160,000. Variable production and material costsare estimated to be $6 per book. The publisher plans to sell the text to college and universitybookstores for $46 each.1. What is the breakeven point?
2. What profit or loss can be anticipated with a demand of 3800 copies?
3. With a demand of 3800 copies, what is the minimum price per copy that the publisher must charge to break even?
4. If the publisher believes that the price per copy could be increased to $50.95 and not affect the anticipated demand of 3800 copies, what action would you recommend?What profit or loss can be anticipated?
arrow_forward
The company World Airline System is composed of the routes X and Y, and each route requires 10 aircraft. These routes can be serviced by three types of aircraft — A, B, and C. There are 5 (five) Type A aircraft available, 10 (ten) Type B, and 10 (ten) Type C. These aircraft are identical except for their operating costs, which are as follows:
Annual Operating Cost ($ millions)
Aircraft Type
Route X
Route Y
A
1.5
1.5
B
2.5
2.0
C
4.5
3.5
The aircraft have a useful life of 5 (five) years and a salvage value of $1 million.
The aircraft owners do not operate the aircraft themselves, but rent them to operators. Owners act competitively to maximize their rental income, and operators attempt to minimize their operating costs. Airfares are also competitively determined. Assume the cost of capital is 10%.
Which aircraft would be used on which route, and how much would each aircraft be worth?
What would happen to usage and prices of each aircraft if…
arrow_forward
Identify and analyse the reverse logistics factors that would improve lazada performance
arrow_forward
Break-Even Analysis
Jesaki Publishing is planning for a new novel, and figures fixed costs (overhead, advances, promotion, copy editing, typesetting) at $65,000, and variable costs (printing, paper, binding, shipping) at $1.60 for each book produced. The book will be sold to distributors for $12 each.
Answer the following questions about this venture.
What is the total profit if Jesaki Publishing breaks even?
$ . Round to the nearest dollar.
arrow_forward
Ace Shoe Company sells heel replacement kits for men's shoes. It has fixed costs of $10 million and unit
variable costs of $5 per pair. If the company charges $15 per pair, how many pairs must it sell to break even
? And what dollar profit level would the company achieve if 15 million kits were sold ? Please show the
necessary steps of how to get the results.
arrow_forward
The table below displays the cost and output per week (in EUR) of the company «Creativia» which produces community textile face masks.
Total Product Quantity
Total variable costs, Euro
0
0
250
350
450
450
650
600
750
750
800
950
830
1300
850
1800
Assume the price is EUR 4,00 and is constant at any quantity,
Calculate the profit at the profit-maximizing output and show the area of profit on the graph.
Determine below what price would the firm exit the market in the long run. Explain your answer.
arrow_forward
Profit decisions are important to the Martins. These decisions arise from understanding the market,
pricing policies and margins. The managers need to understand the appropriate tools and elements
as they target profit levels and their ability to manage the elements of the profit calculation. For
example, if CompuTech is operating at a loss or below break-even, then must understand how they
can manage costs or volumes to generate profits. Break-even analysis can help the Martins and
Compu Tech decide how many units they need to sell, what price should they sell at, fixed costs
levels, and what product or service they should promote.
Given the following:
(i) CompuTech's products are sold for $100 per unit
(ii) CompuTech's products cost $60 per unit (Raw Materials) components
(ii) Fixed Costs are determined by the Income Statement.
Q1: Create a data table and CVP table to reflect the available information. (Yes, you will need to
reference your work from Module 2).
Q2: What is the…
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Related Questions
- specify the generic and specific stackeholders for a certain company identify two stakes at least for each stakeholdersarrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardPlease see attachment and type out the correct answer ASAP with proper explanation of the each option given. Thank you.arrow_forward
- tise or nột to advertise Suppose that Fizzo and Pop Hop are the only two firms that sell orange soda. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Pop Hop Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Fizzo Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Fizzo advertises and Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo will make a profit of $15 million, and Pop Hop will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Fizzo and Pop Hop are both profit-maximizing firms. million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $ million if Pop Hop does not If Fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ advertise. million if Pop Hop does not million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $ If Fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ advertise. TE Don Uenad orticoc Fizze makoc a hiabo nrefit RS R choeces acerarrow_forwardQuestion 2arrow_forwardMooney Corporation has acquired 150 machines in a business combination. Mooney does not intend to use these machines so it is required to recognize these items at fair value. Assume that Mooney has access to 3 different geographical markets (Northwest, Southwest, and Midwest). The Northwest market has legal restrictions and will take at least 6 months to obtain approval to sell the machines in the Northwest. The markets in the Southwest and Midwest can be accessed immediately. Volumes and prices are listed below Market Price Entity Specific Volume Market Volume Northwest $42,000 20% 45% Southwest $52,000 45% 15% Midwest $49,000 35% 40% Which market should Mooney Corporation use to determine the fair value of the machines?arrow_forward
- Please correct answer and don't use hand rating and don't use Ai solutionarrow_forwardWiebe Trucking, Inc., is planning a new warehouse to serve the western United States. Denver, Santa Fe, and Salt Lake City are under consideration. For each location, annual fixed costs (rent, equipment, and insurance) and average variable costs per shipment (labor, transportation, and utilities) are listed in the following table. Sales projections range from 550,000 to 600,000 shipments per year. Location Annual FixedCosts Variable Costsper Shipment Denver Santa Fe Salt Lake City $5,000,000 $4,200,000 $3,500,000 $4.65 $6.25 $7.25 a. Plot the total cost curves for all the locations on a single graph. b. Which city provides the lowest overall costs?arrow_forwardDevelop an imaginatory mode of effective and strategic management development program for XYZ company.arrow_forward
- The manufacturer of smart printers is trying to decide what price to set for its product. The demand and cost function are assumed to be as follows: P = 80 -2Q TC= 160 +50Q-1.5Q ²arrow_forwardA contract of sale under CIF port of Okinawa, Incoterm 2020, was entered between a seller based in Vietnam and a buyer in Japan, for the sale of 500 tons of coffee. The goods were transported and unloaded at the port and kept at customs shed for inspection and payment of duties. The buyer was notified of the arrival of the merchandise and its location. Before the buyer picked up the goods, the customs shed (including the merchandise in it) was destroyed by fire. The buyer claims refund of the purchase price stating that she did not receive the goods. Is the seller responsible?arrow_forwardstate true or false if false correct itarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning