EDUC 750 Discussion Post Getting a Valid Sample in an Educational Setting
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Walden University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
750
Subject
History
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by sbethea0515
EDUC 750 Discussion Post: Getting a Valid Sample in an Educational Setting
Surveying is a vital part of research, but most researchers do not have the
means to conduct studies of large groups of people. In order to survey
students in these populations, researchers must make generalizations about
them through representative samples (Check & Schutt, 2017). When these
samples more likely represent the population they are selected from, they
are better because the research is likely more valid (Check & Schutt, 2017).
There are two distinctions between samples: probability sampling methods
and nonprobability sampling methods (Check & Schutt, 2017). Convenience,
or availability, sampling falls under nonprobability, which means a
representative sample does not occur because it does not follow the process
of random selection (Check & Schutt, 2017). Instead, it chooses convenient
participants who are easy to find. Even though this can lead to self-selection
bias, there are steps one can take to counteract this.
First, researchers can broaden their population pool to help prevent bias. One
way to begin this solution is by looking at the research from similar studies.
For example, one study incorporated the diary method, and they had viewed
hypotheses from other studies about how females, English-proficient
students, and those with positive views towards learning were more likely to
complete the entires with fidelity (Arndt & Rose, 2022). This also influenced
those who volunteered in their research and those who actively participated
more throughout the journey since most of their data was from female
participants. In order to avoid an overpopulation of predictable participants,
researchers will need to widen their search to reach more people. I could use
my students as an example. Although I teach only ninth graders and have
210 students, five out of my six classes are honors classes, so my sample
would not accurately represent the 800 total freshmen in my school if I were
conducting a study about using flipped learning with ninth-graders. Instead, I
would need to recruit other ninth-graders in my school to include general
education, special education, and English Language students into my study
pool for more accurate data. Another alternative would be to adjust my pool
and expand from just ninth-graders to high school students in general so I
could include students of all grades in the school.
One way to entice people to participate is to add an incentive for participants
upon completion. Research shows that the possibility of active participation
nearly doubles when incentives are offered (Herranz‐Zarzoso et al., 2021). A
monetary reward may work for college students, but my students are driven
by Chick-fil-A and Chiptole lunches, so they could be offered a free lunch
upon completion to increase active participation and the diversity of students
involved. Galatians 6:9 says, "Let us not become weary in doing good, for at
the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up" (The Bible App,
n.d.). This verse is one of the main reasons why I believe in giving my
students incentives. If nothing else, my scholars are rewarded for their
perseverance and persistence, so I believe offering incentives for research
participation is a great idea. Overall, availability sampling is convenient
despite its results not accurately reflecting the population it attempts to
sample. To reduce the bias, researchers may need to conduct more research
through previously conducted students and revamp their plan regarding their
sample population.
References
Arndt, H., & Rose, H. (2022). Capturing life as it is truly lived? improving diary
data in educational research.
International Journal of Research & Method in
Education
,
46
(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2022.2094360
Check, J., & Schutt, R. (2017). Research methods in education. (Vols. 1-0).
SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544307725.
Herranz‐Zarzoso, N., Georgantzis, N., & Sabater‐Grande, G. (2021). Self‐
selection bias in a field experiment: Recruiting subjects under different
payment schemes.
Bulletin of Economic Research
,
74
(2), 421–426.
https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12302
The Bible App. (n.d.).
Galatians 6: NIV bible: Youversion
. Bible.com.
https://www.bible.com/bible/111/GAL.6.NIV
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help