2-1 Department Memorandum 1 The Pros and Cons of Performance Evaluations

.docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

330

Subject

Management

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by UltraAnteaterPerson680

Report
1 2-1 Department Memorandum 1: The Pros and Cons of Performance Evaluations 2-1 Department Memorandum 1: The Pros and Cons of Performance Evaluations Alberto Rosales Criminal Justice, SNHU CJ 330: Leadership & Management in CJ Org Professor Brian DeCando 21 Jan 2024
2 2-1 Department Memorandum 1: The Pros and Cons of Performance Evaluations MEMORANDUM To: Chief Executive Officer From: Alberto Rosales Date: 1/17/2024 Subject: Examining the pros and cons of officer evaluations According to the Chief Executive Officer, my responsibility is to provide feedback on whether performance evaluations should be maintained or discontinued in the office. This memorandum will outline both the advantages and disadvantages of performance evaluations. Below, I have outlined the pros and cons of conducting performance evaluations within this department: Pros: One primary benefit that performance evaluations offer to supervisors and officers is providing insights into personal strengths and weaknesses. Recognizing individual weaknesses enables officers to focus on self-improvement. Another positive aspect of conducting performance evaluations is the opportunity for the department to acknowledge and commend individuals who excel in their roles. This recognition not only provides individuals with personal goals but also serves as motivation to strive for excellence. When evaluations are executed effectively, they showcase the rewards of hard work and being acknowledged for one's achievements.
3 2-1 Department Memorandum 1: The Pros and Cons of Performance Evaluations Cons: A drawback of performance evaluations becomes apparent when a manager displays favoritism towards certain individuals, potentially leading to negative consequences for others. If employees perceive that their hard work will not be duly recognized, it can result in decreased motivation. Moreover, this favoritism may adversely impact officers who are seeking assistance in their self-improvement efforts. Another drawback associated with performance evaluations is the potential for negative reflection on an individual who puts in hard work but falls short of the department's expectations. The evaluation may indicate that the person is failing to meet the established guidelines, whereas they might simply require assistance in specific areas. To address this issue effectively, providing training would be the optimal solution. I suggest maintaining the practice of performance evaluations to further improve the overall effectiveness of our officers. Expanding on the achievements of these assessments, I've integrated my recommendations to refine the standards for evaluating officers' productivity. Establish clear expectations early in the hiring process for new officers and enforce strict adherence to guidelines. Maintain detailed notes throughout the evaluation period to facilitate a comprehensive assessment during the evaluation. Offering feedback at the start and end of each shift proves advantageous, keeping officers apprised of their performance throughout the day. Provide officers with the opportunity to comprehend the criteria upon which they will be evaluated during the assessment, ensuring transparency and clarity in the review process.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help