Assessment Evaluation Template- ADDES-S

.docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

622

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by KidWalrus3052

Report
EDUC 622 A SSESSMENT E VALUATION A SSIGNMENT T EMPLATE Collect information about each instrument separately. This form is used multiple times and is turned in with assignment, by inserting as a chart in the written report. Name of Instrument Comprehensive Mathematical Abilities Test Author(s) of Instrument Hresko, Wayne P.; Schlieve, Paul L.; Herron, Shelley R.; Swain, Colleen; Sherbenou, Rita J. Date of Publication 2003 Publisher PRO-ED, 1301 W. 25 th St., Suite 300, Austin, TX. 1. Describe the subtests (e.g., learning areas) Accoring to Engelhard, Jr. (2005) “12 core subtests: General Mathematis, Basic Calculations, Mathematical Reasoning, Advanced Calculations, and Practical Applications” (Engelhard, JR., 2005, para 1). 2. Describe the age range. Ages 7 -18 3. State the purpose of the instrument. “The CMAT has four principal purposes: (a) to determine the strengths and weaknesses among developed mathematical abilities; (b) to identify students who are significantly below or above their peers in mathematical abilities; (c) to make predictions about students’ future performance in mathematics; and (d) to serve as a measurement device in research studies investigating mathematics abilities” (Engelhard, JR., 2005, para 2). 4. Describe the examiner qualifications. It doesn’t say that the examiner needs to have certain qualifications since the manual is so well written. 5. Describe the available scores. There are “10 scores. Vocabulary, Spelling, Punctuation, Logical Sentences, Sentence Combining, Contextual Conventions, Story Composition, Overall Writing, Spontaneous Writing” (Castro-Villarreal and Ponce, 2017, para 1) 6. Describe the instrument’s technical data provided (i.e., validity, reliability, norms, research). Based on research the TOWL-4 did not have any bias for gender or ethnicity. “Results demonstrated that the TOWL-4 was an accurate predictor of literacy skills” (Castro-Villarreal and Ponce, 2017, para 9). 7. Describe features of the instrument that provide well-designed and easy-to-follow administration procedures. The test provides you with a manual, and if you have training in assessment it is easy to follow. You also are provided a scoring manual, forms, response booklets, and picture cards. 8. State the approximate administration and scoring time. The test takes about 90 minutes to administer and score 9. Describe features of the scoring procedures that are well designed and easy to follow. According to Snow “Scaled scores and percentile ranks are provided for subtests and composites, and scoring parameters for each subtest are provided in the examiner’s manuel” (Snow, 2017 para 2).
EDUC 622 10. Explain this instrument’s adaptation for students with limited English proficiency Click or tap here to enter text. 11. Explain the appropriateness of the instrument for use with children who have disabilities. Click or tap here to enter text. 12. Describe the adaptation of the instrument for use with children who have special needs. Click or tap here to enter text. 13. Describe the strengths of the instrument. Click or tap here to enter text. 14. State any weaknesses of the instrument. Click or tap here to enter text. 15. Additional comments, information, and observations: Click or tap here to enter text.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help