Lab 4 Report

.docx

School

Sam Houston State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3395

Subject

Physics

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by ChefSummer12194

Report
LAB 4: COLLISIONS Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843, US. Abstract In this lab, two pucks and tracking software are used to analyze collisions at different angles and to calculate momentum and kinetic energy before and after each collision. Based on the data, most of these collisions did not conserve momentum and lost kinetic energy, indicating that they are inelastic. However, high error values for kinetic energy make it difficult to precisely determine if the collisions are elastic or inelastic. Keywords: momentum, kinetic energy, collision 1. Introduction The goal of this lab is to determine the momentum of the system in the x and y dimension before and after a collision at different angles. The kinetic energy of the system before and after the collision is also calculated to determine if the collisions are elastic or inelastic. Finally, the ratio of momentum before and after the collision is calculated for the x and y dimensions. These exercises will teach students about the effect that differing collision angles have on momentum and the conservation of energy in elastic collisions. | ^ A | = A x 2 + A y 2 Equation 1 where | ^ A | is the magnitude of vector A and A x A y are the vector components σ = 1 n 1 i = 0 n ( x i −´ x ) 2 Equation 2 where σ is the standard deviation, ´ x is the average of all measurements, and n is the number of measurements δ ´ x = σ n Equation 3 where δ ´ x is the uncertainty, σ is the standard deviation, and n is the number of measurements δf = ∂f ∂a δa + ∂f ∂b δb + ∂f ∂c δc … Equation 4 where δf is the propagated error of f where f = f ( a, b, c …), ∂f ∂a is the partial derivative with respect to variable a , and δa is the uncertainty associated with a ´ r 1 · ´ r 2 | ´ r 1 || ´ r 2 | θ = acos ¿ ) Equation 5 where θ is the angle between two vectors and ´ r is a vector p = mv Equation 6 where p is momentum, m is mass, and v is velocity K = 1 2 mv 2 Equation 7 where K is kinetic energy, m is mass, and v is velocity 2. Experimental Procedure Before any measurements could be made with the tracking program, the conversion factor from pixels to cm had to be entered into the program. The distance from the camera to the table top was measured and entered into the program so that the program would automatically convert from pixels to cm. Two pucks with different colored tracking stickers were used for the collision trials, and the air table was turned on to give an almost frictionless surface. The pucks were pushed towards each other at 8 different angles: 90°, 180°, three angles between 90 and
180, and 3 angles between 90 and 0. The tracking camera and program was used in each of these runs, and the program gave the position, velocity, and acceleration of each puck in cm and seconds. After all the data was collected, Equation 1 and Equation 5 were used to calculate the approximate angle for each collision. When choosing points to calculate the angle, two frames were chosen prior to the collision that had constant velocity and acceleration in the x and y direction. The direction vector for each puck could then be determined by calculating the difference in the coordinate values. This direction vector is the vector that was used in Equation 5 . The momentum in the x and y plane and kinetic energy before and after each collision were calculated using Equation 6 and Equation 7 respectively, and the errors for all of these values were calculated using Equation 2 , Equation 3 , and Equation 4 . 3. Results and Analysis The data collected in lab was compiled into an excel document; the tracking program gave position, velocity, and acceleration in terms of cm and seconds. The momentum of the system was not conserved in every collision, but this can likely be attributed to error associated with the tracking program. The collision at 90° was actually approximately 80°, and the collision at 180° was approximately 169°. Because there was no precise way to push the pucks at certain angles, the intended angles were not entirely achieved. In the collision at 180°, the momentum in the x direction was almost zero because the velocity of the pucks was opposite, meaning that the net momentum, which is based on velocity, was approximately zero. The momentum in the x-axis for all collisions happening between 0 and 90 degrees was greater than the momentum of collisions happening between 90 and 180 degrees because the motion in the x was positive for both pucks rather than being positive for one and negative for the other as in the collisions at angles greater than 90°. Because one puck was pushed along the x-axis in every collision, the momentum in the y-axis prior to each collision is based on one puck which is why the momentum in the y-axis is generally lower than the momentum in the x. When comparing momentum before and after each collision, momentum was lost in 5 out of 8 collisions, so in most cases momentum was not conserved. The values for kinetic energy all had relatively high error, and this could explain why the kinetic energy increased in some instances, which would be scientifically impossible. In all cases where the kinetic energy of the system increased following the collision, the error bars overlap in a way that the change in kinetic energy could be zero within only one degree of error. In general, collisions at the smallest angles (27 and 30 degrees) saw an increase in kinetic energy while collisions at angles greater than these saw a decrease in kinetic energy. This indicates that the tracking program is less accurate at smaller angles, and this is not surprising because the pucks start closer together and travel less distance before colliding. Based on the data, it appears that the collisions between the pucks were inelastic because the kinetic energy of the system decreased after the collisions. This loss of energy can likely be attributed to slight changes in the shape of the pucks as they collide and to friction that, though minimal, will still remove energy from the system. However, the collisions could also be elastic, and the loss in kinetic energy could be due to error associated with the tracking program. 4. Conclusions In a majority of the collisions, momentum was not conserved, and the kinetic energy of the system decreased. This indicates that the collisions between the two pucks were inelastic. Energy and velocity were likely lost due to friction and perhaps slight changes in the shape of the pucks when they collided. Additionally, the error associated with the tracking program may have caused these changes in momentum and kinetic energy, in which case it is possible that all of the collisions were elastic, momentum was conserved, and kinetic energy did not change. 80 30 27 62 169 122 128 136 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 px before and after px before px after Collision Angle Momentum (g*m/s) Figure 1: Graph showing momentum in the x-axis before and after the collision. 80 30 27 62 169 122 128 136 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 py before and after py before py after Collision Angle Momentum (g*m/s) Figure 2: Graph showing momentum in the y-axis before and after the collision.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help