Critical Evaluation of the Classical Management Style

Maddern, J., Courtney, M., Montgomery, J., & Nash, R. (2006). Traditional and emerging organisational designs (2nd ed.). Marrickville, Australia: Elsevier Australia.

"Classical Organizational Theory deals with the 'systematic processes necessary to make bureaucracy more efficient and effective.' Name three scholars that are credited with the development of classical organization thought that most correctly fit into this definition of Classical Organizational Theory. What were the basic arguments articulated by each in their contributions to the development of Classical Organizational Theory?"

Classical organizational theories: As a group, we do not feel that the classical organizational theory complies with the six core values of the NASW code of ethics. We did not feel that the classical organization theory provided any help, support, or benefits to help the members reach their maximum potentials, other than those who are already at the top. We also felt that this theory did not provide equal rights, protection, or social benefits as a part of the social justice perspective of the core values. Where the power and resources rest at the top of the agencies who utilize this theory, we feel that those at the bottom are not held in high esteem, valued, or appreciated. We also feel that the importance of human relationships is dismissed

2. Employees will exercise self-direction and self-control if they are committed to objectives. External control and the threat of punishment are not the only means to make employees to work towards objectives.

An organization needs to look at the environment around them and decide what will the best approach for them to use. Since the organization wants to be successful they will need to find the right fit for them. All contemporary approaches are utilized within each of the three environments to make the best outcome of the organization and continue to improve with the changing elements of today’s

The Functional, Product/Division, Hybrid, and Matrix are traditional structures that may work depending on the organization's size and goals (Organizational behavior). This is important to understand seeing that each structure has positive and negative effects. Multinational organizations utilize these structures in their own ways, picking bits and pieces to create their unique structures in accordance with demands. Creating a structure in which to run a company is no easy task because it takes time and effort to analyze what is beneficial for the company and its employees.

This essay will discuss the relevance of the ideas of classical theorists in today’s work and organisations. I will evaluate why these ideas gained popularity when they were published by looking at the influences that classical theorists were surrounded by at the time of their development. I will then focus on bureaucracy and scientific theories, by looking at the organisations and countries that have adopted this style and how a negative reputation has been

2. Can you reach any general conclusions from your investigations about how organisational function, structure and culture interact in EWB Australia?

This is a good fit for someone who is a strong enough personality to maintain the perfect example for employees.

If we go back to the first half of the twenty first century, organization theory was dominated by classicists who viewed organizations as rational systems and valued efficient operations above all. They promoted the idea that management is a process of planning, organization, command, coordination n, and control and that design of an organization should be like that of a machine. This concept spawned the modern bureaucracy. (Morgan, 1997a)

Organisational structure implicates a configuration of tasks and activities and includes the ‘framework’ and informal structure dimension (Skivington and Daft, 1991). An organization structure and strategy drives each other (Enrique, Eva M and José F, 2012). Hence, an organization structure is

(c) Analyse the structure of your organisation with reference to the structural dimensions of formalisation, complexity and centralisation. Do these structural features help or hinder the ability of your organisation and/ or department to achieve its objectives? Explain, referring to relevant examples in developing your answer (750 words).

Every company has its own unique organisational structure. This can be described as the system or pattern of relationship in which power and roles are given to the employers and employees. It also involves how the company is designed in order to achieve its goals and its communication channels. A good structure is crucial because the strategic decisions made can either benefit or worsen an organisation (Mullins, 2005). For example, a good structure would encourage and motivate employees in order to keep morale and job satisfaction at the highest possible level so that productive efficiency can be reached. This essay will describe the different designs of organisational structures and assess whether in today’s world, organisations are

Management, is the art and science of getting things to be done, generally by others. (Mullins 2011), states is the way of organizing the things and to direct the duties of people in the setting of their jobs In many organizations, people are managed in the setting of their jobs because all employees have different abilities (Thompson, and McHugh, 2009). The different management perspectives evolved are classified into five perspectives, classical, humanistic, management science, recent historical trends and the innovative management. The classical theory includes three other perspective, scientific management, Bureaucratic organization, and Administrative approach. These are the historical theories of management. Based on the classical perspective

The history of management includes multiple theories and understanding them can help individuals identify the ideas their organization is built upon. Classical organizational theory encompasses several major approaches to management that continue to be influential even today. The early to mid-twentieth century included the introduction of many concepts of management theory such as scientific management, bureaucratic and administrative theory. Most of these early approaches revolved around control of employees and processes in order to achieve more