Intercollegiate Athletics Council Case

The vision statement of the University of California, Davis Athletics department is to be a prestigious model program in athletics and academics.

While continuing chapter seven I continue to learn more and more about Intercollegiate Athletics. The next three topics its talks about is athletic conferences, basics of college sport finance, and director of athletics. Chapter 7 is continuously gives information about intercollegiate athletics. Chapter 7 also talks about first line managers.

The competitive athletics programs of member institutions are designed to be a vital part of the educational system. A basic purpose of this Association is to maintain intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of the educational program and the athlete as an integral part of the student body and, by so doing, retain a clear line of demarcation between intercollegiate athletics and professional sports (NCAA, 2011).

The National Collegiate Athletic Association is charged with the regulation of athletes, and all athletic programs in affiliated universities and colleges across the United States. The N.C.A.A. is the association charged with developing and implementing policies regarding athletics in colleges and universities. With such a role, the association is mandated to specify the minimum academic requirements for a student to participate in any sporting activity. The association claims that it aims at creating a balance between sport and education. The heart of the association 's mission is student-athlete success in classroom and on the field. N.C.A.A. comes up with policies that provide a student-athlete with the opportunity to learn through sporting activities. This is a noble endeavor, but some institutions as presented in the article by Sarah Lyall (1) have misused it. In the article, one can see that the University of North Carolina denied some of its student-athletes the learning opportunity envisioned by the N.C.A.A. Sarah Lyall (1). By offering the students free grades, U.N.C. was doing the students a great disservice, which only served the interests of the university.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association is charged with the regulation of athletes, and all athletic programs in affiliated universities and colleges across the United States. The N.C.A.A. is the association charged with developing and implementing policies regarding athletics in colleges and universities. With such a role, the association is mandated to specify the minimum academic requirements for a student to participate in any sporting activity. The association claims that it aims at creating a balance between sport and education. The heart of the association 's mission is student-athlete success in classroom and on the field. N.C.A.A. comes up with policies that

Collegiate athletics is growing each day and the athletes are becoming faster, stronger, and quicker each day. As the competition on the field improves, the risk of injury also becomes more of a possibility. While strength and conditioning coaches have created athletes who are able to withstand more physical play and can rehab quicker from injury, they have also created monsters on the playing field and court. As collegiate athletics grows into a multibillion dollar industry, the players expect to have more benefits available to them, including workers’ compensation. We have seen a variety of situations arise recently were players are looking to secure their own safety when playing such physical games.

For many students, the college experience is measured by the success of their NCAA-sanctioned athletic programs. Without the experience and athletic performance the student athlete brings, most colleges would not reap the benefit of these significant revenue-generating activities. At best, current NCAA regulations need to be revisited to ensure all avenues are addressed to enable the success of athletic students both in the classroom and on the field or court of play. As stated previously, even though students receive full and partial scholarships determined by their athletic performance, in both instances

The following Case Study is about the National Collegiate Athletic Association unethical act in the sport college league. How this league creates big amounts of money which is invest in all short of projects rather than take care of the student-athletes. The study case highlight the two main principles issue that the National Collegiate Athletic Association faces; the money how the student are not getting paid and the academic versus sport.

They view participation in sport as an aspect that goes along with one’s studies. This mindset is symbolic of collegiate authorities from the late 19th century who strongly worked towards maintaining the academic integrity of the institution that they were a part of. One of the things that makes this topic so special is the fact that millions of dollars are made every second off of collegiate competitions and days continue to pass where a solution is not found to make this fair for everyone.

student athletes, should be designed in a way that promotes academic progress as well as graduation.

The chairman’s, Walter Harrison, job is to patrol each divisions operations and make sure it’s consistent with the basic purposes, fundamentals policies, and general principals of the NCAA are being followed. The next level is the Executive Committee Subcommittee on Gender and Diversity Issues. The chairman, Clinton Bristow Jr., of this level is responsible for providing reviews and recommendations to the executive committee regarding gender, minorities, and youth issues of the overall student athlete welfare. Following the subcommittee is the Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports Committee whose chairman in rule of this level is Michael Krauss. This level of power is in charge of providing and promoting a healthy and safe environment for student athletes through research, education, collaboration and policy development. The Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports Committee are divided into two sublevels: The Drug Education and Drug Testing ran by Don Kaverman, and the Sports Science safety, ran by Jerry Weber. The Honors Committee is the next role of power and the chairman of this level is Valerie A Richardson. The responsibility of this section is to receive and select the recipients of the Theodore Roosevelt, Silver Anniversary, Top VIII, Award of Valor and Inspiration awards. The Minority Opportunities and Interests Committee, conducted by Robert C. Vowels Jr, is the next level of power

The Auburn University Athletics Department continues to make major strides in benefiting students, Auburn fans, and the general public. As the Assistant Athletic Director of Public Relations and Strategic Communication at Auburn University, Cassie Arner focuses on a multitude of tasks to keep the public informed of many parts and corresponding activities of the university 's athletic programs, ranging anywhere from managing a chaotic game day to handling legal crises among student-athletes or faculty members. As a main figure in Auburn 's branch of athletics, Arner oversees short and long-term communication strategies designed to enhance the overall support of the college 's National Collegiate Athletic Association ("NCAA") Division I sports programs.

Over the years, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has encountered criticism over eligibility of its student athletes. Some say that it is not tough enough on student-athletes when it comes to academic status. Others believe that the NCAA sets reasonable standards for student-athletes. There are three divisions in the NCAA, Division I, Division II, and Division III. The NCAA sets their eligibility and regulations in a hierarchal type structure; starting from the school’s athletic program, then the institution, and finally the NCAA. The NCAA sets strict standards for perspective college athletes, but also gives them a good opportunity for these standards to be met.

Do student athletes make the most of their opportunity to obtain a post-secondary education? Do they have the same academic success as those students that are not athletes? Are student athletes just “dumb jocks?” The answers to these questions might surprise you. Much research has been done to dispel the myth that athletes going to college are only there to play sports with little regard to their education. Programs have been created to assure that colleges and universities hold athletes to the same standards as the everyday student. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has decided that the “magic number” to put the “student” back into “student-athlete” is 925 (Hamilton).

There has been amplified debate on the treatment, education, training of the college athlete. To avoid exploitation of athletes, “The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), formed in 1905, set bylaws requiring college student-athletes to be amateurs in order to be eligible for intercollegiate athletics competition” (Schneider n.p.). Intercollegiate athletics have dramatically changed over the last several decades. Currently, intercollegiate athletics generate tremendous amounts of revenue, remarkably in football and basketball. College sports in America is a