Problem Identification:
CEO Bob Galvin ended his speech on April 24, 1983 with words that brought much
confusion to Motorola. He stated that he “wanted to decrease the many layers of
management and to bring management closer to the product and market.” This was a
revolutionary idea with great vision. However, the timing of the speech and lack of
proper preparation for the following after effects were ill advised. Bob had not consulted
with his two upper management partners, William Weisz and John Mitchell nor had he
discussed it with Human Relations. The main purpose of Bob wanting to make these
changes were the issues he was constantly hearing about employees stating there was too
many issues with the management matrix
…show more content…
Middle
management certainly would not want to change their current day-to-day business plans.
As well, the changes would mean a loss of power to their power base. The new plan
would have a lot of middle managers cut out of the picture all together. Weisz and
Mitchell would be up to the challenge but being caught off guard did not help the
situation at all. Human Relations VP Joe Miraglia worked with Galvin to set the wheels
in motion but noted it would not be easy and needed to be handled with care to make it
work. HR also questioned if this would truly fix the actual problem. They felt that just
creating small business units would only correct the structural issue and not the root
cause.
Solution:
The best call of action that Galvin and Motorola need to take is to first get his upper
management as well as Human Relations on board with the vision. The plan of attack
needs to be lined out and detailed as well as have contingency plans in place for when
things go awry. Time tables need to be set out so precise measures can be taken and
charted for progress as the project develops. Middle managers need to be involved
heavily and they have to have the authority to make true change. The new vision must be
shown to everyone as a positive growth for the employees, management and the
company. Last but not least there needs to be an over abundant amount of communication
that takes place between
Step 4 is to communicate the Vision. When everyone in the company understands and believes in what the company stands for, it creates a sense of unity and will reduce resistance to change. Communication is the key. Training will be implemented, but if there are any additional
I believe that Smith could have and should have spoke to the people of Flint. Smith was not clear on why he was making the layoffs to the workers, but Moore does confront Tom Kay about the issue. Kay’s response was that Smith made the layoffs to increase their profit and they will do that by opening a factory in Mexico and hiring people down there to work for less pay. Moore then was on the hunt for Smith trying to interview and speak with him. Moore spent three year chasing Smith across the country and he never did get to speak with Roger Smith. As CEO Smith should have agreed to at least talk with Moore about the issues that the layoffs have brought and why the layoffs happened. Smith also could have brought up the issues with the higher up GM workers and ask them to lend a helping hand in this
Most healthcare organization are facing tremendous amount of challenges as they attempt to solve problems and take advantages of the numerous opportunities brought about by the advancement in information technology, and information system. The decision to embark on a certain project can prove to be a daunting task, due to the fact that most proposed project will encounter major resistance and experience low stakeholder buy-in. One of the major reason that project faces resistance is the lack a well articulated vision statement at the initial phase of the project. As in the case of FutureCare Medical Group, a clear vision for the project was ambiguous at best, and achieve very little in persuading the physician's group to offer their full support.
All internal stakeholders want to be part of this development and are motivated to make it work
some difficult decisions. Only eight months into his job as chief marketing officer (CMO) of GE’s
Microsoft is a multinational corporation of the United States; It specializes in developing, manufacturing, trading software licenses and supporting a wide range of computer related products and services.. In terms of revenue, Microsoft is the world's largest software maker. It is also called "one of the most valuable companies in the world".
Planning the change – Ensure that all research has been completed; examine the organisational structure, job descriptions, and performance and compensation systems to ensure they are in line with the vision.
Clearly, "beleaguered" Ogilvy's new CEO needed to prevent further decline by instituting changes that were long overdue:
Throughout the hearing, CEO Mary Barra states that the mistakes of the “old GM (pre-bankruptcy)” are not the fault of the “new GM (post-bankruptcy)”, she pledges to fix the situation, starting with the new position of Vice President
In the Romano Pitesti case, Tickton-Jones’ Management Team is faced with a situation that is not altogether uncommon in the business world, in that some employees feel that members of the Sales staff are being given “special” treatment by the company. Romano’s actions have probably not been as bad as what has been described to Management, but due to the fact that employees are still trying to find their place in the new, combined company, any hint of “unfairness” is immediately put under a microscope by other employees, and therefore, Management will have to take some sort of action, in order to show the other employees that their concerns are being taken seriously.
That relates directly to winning a larger market share. The short-term goal for the company should be to cut coasts and improve the human resource department functions. Which can be done through the above stated suggestions of the improvement of the business.
Kotter’s step 2 of building a powerful coalition is often combined with step 3 of getting the vision right as organisations bring senior and middle managers as well as employees together with a shared vision for the organisation. Participation and involvement from all levels of the organisations in building a successful coalition not only acts as a motivation for employees to support the change effort by reducing resistance but also facilitate a creation of a good vision that will help to clarify the direction in which the organisation needs to move and the strategies in achieving these desired vision (Armenakis & Harris, 2009). Without a sensible vision, a transformation effort can easily dissolve into a list of confusing and incompatible projects that can take the organisation in the wrong direction or nowhere at all (Kotter, 2007).
We will further discuss what led to this situation, and give a recommendation on the changes that should have been made prior to the divestiture in 1984.
Discussion Questions 1. Evaluate this situation from the view point of David Edmondson’s ethical leadership. What could Radio Shack have done differently? In this world some people want money and power. To gain these two things often people choose the wrong ways. David Edmondson is one of them, because he cheated on his resume. David Edmondson is a fraud that means he is not an ethical leader at all. Because of Edmondson’s cheating his company RadioShack faced losses, so he didn’t do ethical leadership in his workplace. If a manager cheats, lies, steals, manipulates, take advantages of situations, or treat others unfairly that is not an ethical behavior. That is called unethical behavior. We can see
Motorola was first founded in 1928, making battery eliminators for household radios. In 1929 the company designed and manufactured and car radios, then a new concept, and subsequent sales kept the company afloat during the Great Depression of the 30s.