Rational Decision Making Analysis

An outcome evaluation focuses on long term program measures such as morbidity, mortality and disability. Outcome evaluations assess the programs ability to effect change and determine whether program objectives were met. An important consideration when conducting an outcome evaluation is to choose the appropriate evaluation design based on time, resources and the message you intend to deliver. Additionally, the evaluator needs to consider what variables to evaluate in order to demonstrate the program’s impact.

Population heath and the assessment of health for communities, groups and, individuals have gained great attention over the past few years. The rapid change in health care as a result of legislation and health care reform has led organizations to rethink the way in which health care is delivered. With the transition of care from inpatient to outpatient, health care organization are now focused on population health, the prevention of preventable illness and hospitalizations (Schifferdecker et al., 2015). A health assessments provide health care organization with valuable information regarding where to focus their efforts. This paper will review the key elements of a health assessments for individuals, specific groups, and communities. It

Deborah Stone begins her book, Policy Paradox, by stating, “a theory of policy politics must start with a simple model of political society, just as economics starts with a simple model of economic society.” Deborah Stone examines two policy-making models to describe the paradox’s of the process model for public policy. The two models include: the market (rational model) and the Polis (community) model. Stone states she contrasts these two models to “illuminate some ways the market model distorts political life.” As discussed in class, the market model follows five steps:

Credible evidence is very important in order to ensure stakeholder engagement and to strengthen the evaluation finding and recommendations. Credible evidence regarding our program will be gathered from key indicators. A key indicator is a specific, observable, and measurable component that supports the goal or premise of the program. Our key indicators include survey data, service utilization, observations of staff, interviewing the target population and solicitation of feedback. Specific milestones regarding these indicators are delineated in the program goals and

The National Center for Cultural Competence developed a validated assessment tool “at the request of the Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Service (DHHS)” (National Center for Cultural Competence (NCCC), 2004). The intent of the assessment tool is to “to enhance the delivery of high quality services to culturally and linguistically diverse individuals and underserved communities” (NCCC, para. 1, 2004).

Deborah Stone compares the market and polis models of policy making with the intent to show that the original origin of the public policy discipline was to be grounded in a practical science, economics, but to also show how and why the economic approach to policy making has significant limitations. Stone is arguing against the view that policy decision making is rational decision making. Deborah Stone’s main reason for comparing the two models of policy making is to identify and critique the simplistic assumptions that have been used in the market and rationality project. Stone is attempting to point out the paradox that exists between the two because the two models are evidently contradictory, the market being ground in rationality and the polis being based on emotion. Stone compares the two policies in order to show that economics cannot be solely used to understand policy making because the two are fundamentally different. She also points out that policy is made in a political society and because of this the polis model seeks to explain public policy as it actually happens in reality since the field and study of public policy was created to allow government to make decisions that would best benefit their citizens.

The evaluation that I reviewed related to my own evaluation because it Invest heavily in planning. In was clear that they had invested both time and effort in deciding what they want to learn from their evaluation. Also, based on the information provided they discussed what they plan to do with their findings. The Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (2010) state “for evaluation information to be useful, it must be analyzed and interpreted.” (p. 3). This week’s reading assignment supported me to successfully analyze the data gathered concerning the program I selected. Also, it provided some basic information about different procedures for analyzing evaluation data to help me comprehend and participate more fully in this procedure. For instance, I learned that I can “analyze information about attainment of program implementation using a descriptive process” that describes what was completed or plan to complete (OPRE, 2010, p.

Purpose of the evaluation: What aspect of the program would you assess? How does this complement the larger group evaluation? (5 points)

Evaluation of the program should be ongoing, in the best effort to target issues within the program as efficiently as possible. Evaluation should be built into the program, making it effortless for those involved to provide the necessary information to create useful evaluations. Additionally, any evaluation should be cost effective, so as to not hinder the program as a whole. Any evaluations must also be done ethically and conducted competently. It is also important to disseminate the results of evaluations to interested and appropriate audiences.

It is my recommendation that Shuzworld change their facilities layout to create a better workflow. You can accomplish this by breaking the current structure and reorganizing the workstations to accomplish tasks in a more time efficient manner and maximizing an employees’ time spent on the product. Utilizing the Case Study we can surmise that each eight hour shift must produce forty-eight work boots. 8 hours times 60 minutes equals 480 minutes. 480 minutes (The Work Shift) divided by 48 (the number of work boots required) equals 10. One work boot must be completed in 10 minutes to meet production goals. Let’s take a look at the steps involved

In a world of increasing competition for health resources economic evaluations are essential to provide evidence to decision makers that allows them to make appropriate decisions regarding the best use of those resources (Cohen and Reynolds, 2008; Williams et al., 2008). Critical appraisal is the means by which the validity of this research is assessed and is essential for true evidence based practice, and decision-making (Burls, 2009; Ciliska, Thomas and Buffett, 2008).

Implementation evaluation can be used if a new program is being started or if it is determined that an existing program initial goal is not being met (Mertens & Wilson, 2012). Utilizing implementation evaluation encompasses the following; responsive, monitoring, developmental, formulation participatory, and process (Mertens & Wilson, 2012). Furthermore, implementation evaluations asks questions such as; did the program fall in alignment with the plan or there any changes that need to be made in administrative or participant screening (Mertens & Wilson, 2012)?

Rational choice theory is actually more than one theory per se, but the basic similarities among its variants mean that they can be intelligibly amalgamated for the purposes of critiquing its implementation in political science. Therefore public choice theory, positive political science, rational actor models, and the economic approach to politics, among others, refer to what we may call rational choice theory for the purposes of this essay. (See Green and Shapiro 1994, xi.

If an evaluation of this program were to be performed, it would be requested by administration. Administration in this agency includes, but is not limited to the president and vice president of the agency, an executive program director and his/her assistant, and a small panel of developmental board members. Staff members at Eskenazi Health would find the feedback from the evaluation beneficial, as they can use it to better the care and

This report will discuss about the approach to rational decision making process. It discusses how an everyday problem faced by management can be tackled by using