Why Teenage Mothers Do Not Continue

Research reviewers can vary in their approach and design to systematizing their review. For example, reviewers can decide to include studies with only certain design characteristics or those using a full range of designs (Brown, 2014). Furthermore, the qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches can be distinguished by a systematic analysis of the research method (Boswell & Cannon, 2017).

In this assignment I will be comparing the different types of research methodologies for health and social care.

Various researches exists in the health care premises to determine the best policies that will promote the utilization of resources within healthcare. However, some research work that utilizes social scientific methods fails to focus on exploring maternal ambiguity and ambivalence. Rather, the paradigm informing the majority research about infants feeding practices remains a public health perspective. From that perspective, many studies tend to explore why women do not initiate breastfeeding. Again, it suggests some options why women do not breastfeed for the recommended period. Thus, it is imperative to recommend the appropriate interventions to change maternal behaviour. The work remains the most accurately considered advocacy research as its purposes help the overall public in some ways. It gives additional weight to arguments for devoting more governmental resources to breastfeeding promotion. A small number of studies have utilized social sciences methods to generate valuable insights about the tension between policy and maternal practices and experience.

Moreover, this title lacked in a word, triangulation while about the half of paper was devoted to the argument about triangulation. The abstract contained objectives, design, results, and conclusion in slightly repetitive manner. The introduction started with the summarization of current debate of those who agree and disagree with the mixed method studies, and the information of triangulation was followed by the description of the authors ' intention of the research. Consequently, the purpose section repeated a part of the introduction, they were, to identify and review the types of analysis methodology used in research articles whether parallel, concurrent, or sequential data analysis, and to demonstrate the use of triangulation by selecting papers resulted as complementary, convergent, and divergent. The authors chose to use systematic principles as a method and clearly presented each step, including terms and search engines they used to find articles and reasons of inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the selection, review, and categorization of articles, authors conducted two specific author name search without explaining why these people were picked for what purpose. After the identification of 168 papers, the

Drawing on a range of evidence discuss how different types of research can be used to support practice.

Full-time work status has shown to have a considerable negative impact on breastfeeding continuation, particularly among mothers who return to work within 12 weeks (Mandal., 2010; Mirkovic et al., 2014a). In contrast, Ms.Clancy stated full-time job status was not an independent determinator to breastfeeding cessation. Mothers with strong social support and adequate workplace support are less likely to be affected even when they work full-time. She acknowledged that both local breastfeeding coalition and peer support played a significant role in encouraging breastfeeding continuation among full-time working mothers. The systematic analysis by Chung et al. (2008) found that lay support increased the duration of any breastfeeding and recommended

statistics in the study shows other factors associated with early breastfeeding discontinuation which is maternal age younger than 30 years old has a significant impact on discontinuing breastfeeding, following by 63.3% of mothers with the first child, depression in the family, single, Medicaid; 80%, 57.1%, 50%, respectively. The rest of factors were no family planning, does not have a partner, parental care after the first trimester, ethnic minority, and childhood trauma, Whereas, Domestic violence was the lowest factor. In the second research which conducted on 31 of sample size, the reasons for breastfeeding discontinuation were 23%for either reason milk did not come in/ milk dried up, or perceived that baby prefers the bottles. While, 17%

Provides researchers across the social, behavioral, and health sciences with a comprehensive introduction to mixed methods research. Authors John W. Creswell and Vicki L. Plano Clark combine the latest thinking about mixed methods research designs with practical, step-by-step

We know that when it comes to breast feeding it is not as easy as we think it is. I used to think that it was all about the baby and how they respond, but I found out quickly it is about how both the mother and baby respond. My sister tried hard to breast fed her daughter, but they could not get her to latch on. After reading some research I found some factors that play into these negative outputs on breast feeding. Breast feeding can be stressful on the mother and baby. When that happens neither the mom nor the baby want to breast fed. While researching, I found some contributors to the negative effects on breast feeding. Some mothers might not like it, because they simply don’t want to do it. According to the article, Infant feeding experiences among teen mothers in North Carolina: Findings from a mixed-methods study, they found that some mothers don’t like the act of breast- feeding, and lack the confidence to believe in themselves to be able to breast feed (Tucker, Wilson, & Samandari, 2011, 2). These negative barriers that we see in breast feeding can be fixed by passing on the knowledge of breast-feeding and what it can do for the mother and the

In addition, the researcher used thematic analysis to find any of the explicit or implicit themes within the interview comments and surveys. The purpose of using thematic analysis was to be able to gather any sort of commonalities within the responses of the participants. In addition, with the use of the purposive sampling method, the participant was able to gather testimonial narratives that would provide a depth of information to the study (Merriam, 1992). The criterion for the study was: female Elementary school educators, who are breastfeeding while working within this setting or who have breastfed within the last ten years. In addition, the participants needed to have taught within the Yolo or Sacramento counties. The participants had to be female and working while breastfeeding. Each participant was asked for their consent to take part in the study. The research includes interviews and Likert scale surveys of Elementary school educators from Yolo and Sacramento counties. The participants acknowledged their consent through the reading and signing of the consent letter for taking part in the study (Appendix A). Also, before each participant was interviewed, they were first given a Likert scale survey (Appendix B). After completing the survey, the participants were then interviewed individually, using a ten question open-ended questionnaire (Appendix C). The interview sessions were all conducted by the researcher. The participants were interviewed to gain insight on factors that influence/d their experiences and decision making regarding breastfeeding in the workplace. The focus was on their narrative testimonial accounts and whether their experiences also impacted their private and public

In any mixed methods study, you should clearly indicate that you are collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. Methods of data collection are typically associated with either numbers or numeric data and words or text and image data. Mixed methods researchers collect both quanti­tative and qualitative data.

The transferability of a study according to Wright (2014) is the concept of external validity which is when the study and its findings could be repeated by other researchers working in different venues (p.115). “Researchers should provide sufficient information on the informants and the research context to enable the reader to assess the findings’ capability of being fit or transferable” (Cope, 2017, p. 89). The study by Pradeilles et al, provided a detailed time line, note-taking methods and criteria for choice of codes to demonstration its transferability. This study used a mixed research method which involved both qualitative and quantitative to collect quality and quantity data. Pradeilles et al., (2016) explain the mixed methods design allows the authors to obtain views from a greater number of people in a

When both research designs are used together, more information can be gathered. Mixed methodology uses the numerical portion of the quantitative study design in combination with the descriptive aspect of the qualitative study. There are many similarities between these two designs, which make them compatible with each other.

Quantitative research is considered to be the use of numbers. In the use of a quantitative study, the researcher test objective theories by examining the conjunction among variables. The variables used can be measured on instruments, so that numbered data can be used and analyzed (Creswell, 2008). Qualitative research is mainly used to explore and understand human or social problems. The process of qualitative studies includes questions and procedures; and the data is collected byway of participant’s settings. It allows the researcher to study an issue in great detail and depth, as well as not allowing data collection to be constrained by predetermined data. Mixed methods research combines quantitative and qualitative methods and it involves philosophical assumptions. This form of study includes collecting and analyzing data from a quantitative and qualitative perspective. It is believed that mixed methods research is a great method for practicing researchers who would like to bridge the schism between quantitative and qualitative research (Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2004a). Even though these methods are different, they all involve philosophical assumptions and distinct methods or procedures (Cresswell, 2009).

Like Amy and Loeber (2009), when it comes to the ecological paradigm of teenage pregnancy, Corcoran, Franklin, and Bennett (2000) also believe one’s socioeconomic status is a huge factor that contributes to this problem. A person’s socioeconomic status a lot of times determines “education, expanded family size, single-parent household structure, and lessened resources in terms of employment and income.” These three authors claim that educational performance and goals “dictate the potential costs of child bearing at a young age.” Their studies have also shown that teenage girls’ relationships with the school setting and poorer performance in school serve a greater risk for adolescent pregnancy.