World Opinion Essay

Moral Dilemma to me, means having to make an ethical decision between what is considered right and what is considered wrong.

My worldview has been shaped and expanded over the course of my lifetime by many different influences. My family, friends, coworkers, teachers, and even strangers have made impacts on my life that have in one way or another changed how I view society and the world around me. The three main components that help to form my worldview are Ethics, Human Nature, and God, because they molded my thoughts, experiences, education and life decisions.

It is a creature created by God. We are extraordinary machines full of mystery images of God and we were made to serve God. “Human beings are created in the image of God and thus possess personality, self-transcendence, intelligence, morality, gregariousness and creativity” (Sire, 2009). In postmodernism and scientism human beings are created by matter and there is no foundation of human beings from the beginning or why we exist.

With this year being the year that a new president takes over, there has been a lot of news surfacing that may or may not be true. When looking at an article we must look at different criteria of things like the facts used, names mentioned, publication dates, and altogether the article and what it is saying.

Jessica Taylor of NPR talks about how “Donald Trump's praise towards the Russian President Vladimir Putin” is creating controversy once again after his interview on Thursday to state-funded Russian Television. It is pretty obvious to the everyday American that the U.S. lags behind Russia in the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and that as America's global influence diminishes, a potential nuclear war with Russia could have earth-shattering effects. With these rising tensions and a nuclear war threatening on the horizon, one would imagine a President to work to relieve the possible threat. No President since Ronald Reagan has made efforts to work, or possibly find an ally within Russia. Over the past 8 years, President

I. A worldview is a person's concept of what the world is, how the world operates, and the place he or she has in the world. The worldview can also encompass the philosophy of life held by the person, because life philosophy and understanding of the world are generally linked to one another. In other words, a person who has a highly religious worldview would very likely have a philosophy of life that encompassed the need for a kinder world, and that included the relationship between what happens in this world and the promise of an afterlife. The person who has an atheistic worldview would be expected to have a philosophy of life that was different from that of a religious person, and that encompassed different things that were important to that person. A worldview can change over time, of course, because it is generally shaped by parents and school at an early age. As a person ages, he or she explores the world and sees it differently, which can lead to a change in the overall worldview held by that person and how he or she will choose to respond to the world in the future.

In a world that filled with disputes and disagreements, it is somehow difficult to describe a conflicting event in a neutral tone based on one’s own judgment, typically for those historians who attempted to examine the events occurred in the past. As a matter of fact, people’s perspectives may be influenced by many conditions such as their cultural identities, genders, religions, emotions etc. Therefore, it is more likely that historians tend to hold biased view that may affect their tone in neutrality. However, to what extent can historians, or more generally the people, learn the history from an unbiased and neutral perspective? In general, as long as people equally analyze the view points from both sides and take the position between

Pruitt to dismantle the rules” (Friedman 2). Friedman also states “Mr. Trump appeared to claim he has already done so, telling a crowd in Alabama: “Did you see what I did to that? Boom, gone” (2). There is no explanation of where any of these quotes were taken from or from what event they were stated at. Although there is obviously a very left bias, the ethos presented in it is appropriate. The author of the article, Lisa Friedman, is a reporter who focuses on climate and environmental policy. She has covered eight international climate talks. This information is critical when establishing Friedman’s ethos as it depicts her vast knowledge on the topic and how she is fit to discuss the matter through her experience.

relations with one of its most necessary trade partners and, potentially, a necessary ally in relations in Asia, particularly the Korean Peninsula. However, there are negative implications of President Trump’s “America First” approach to politics, as it will further weaken an already tense relationship between the United States and China in regards to issues such as North Korea, climate change, global leadership and the economy.

After the Civil War had ended, citizens and slaves of the United States expected ideal changes that would affect their way of living. Most of the beliefs people had consisted of liberty, equality and religion. During 1825 to 1850, the expected democratic ideals from the reform movements consisted of liberty for slaves and women, equality in education and punishment, and freedom in their religios beliefs.

The US and Russia will likely never engage in a full scale direct conflict in our lifetimes. Russia, The US and China will remain super powers for a long time yet. We are no more on the brink of Russia than the Cold War has ever ended. Hint: it didn't. Russia and the US, along with their respective allies, have been and continue to wage war against each other in the form of psy-ops, espionage and proxy wars (i.e.: Syria). In the article Laurie Douglas posted, a self-proclaimed anti-Putin, Russian nationalist war veteran said "...the subject of war has been grossly exaggerated... What we have here is psychosis deliberately created by the authorities to mobilize the underclass and make it forget about poverty and violation of human rights,”. This is what's important. The

Snyder claims that realism failed to predict the Cold War. Given this, Mearsheimer states “China cannot rise peacefully.” Since realists describe the world as a self-help system, according to Posen, every country “must look to its own interests relative to those of others” and because “security is the preeminent issue in an anarchic world, the distribution of capabilities to attack and defend should matter.” Thus, because China’s strive for regional hegemony inevitably threatens the power dynamic of the global system, the U.S. will, according to Mearsheimer, take an offensive realist approach that will eventually lead to war. In addition, as seen in post-Cold War, economic stability greatly determines the distribution of power. Friedberg notes, that the projected “speed and magnitude of China’s growth in recent decades appears to be unprecedented” and as early as 2015, “China’s economy could overtake that of the United States.” Although the U.S. faces an unprecedented challenge to economic power, according to Ikenberry, China has signaled cooperation by “redoubling its participation in existing institutions, such as the ASEAN Regional Forum and the East Asia Summit or working with the other great powers in the region to build new ones.” Nevertheless, following the actions of the U.S. post WWII, China strategically makes “itself more predictable and approachable” to reduce “the incentives for other

Opinion essay is a formal piece of essay writing which presents the author’s point of view on a

It would be a negligence not mention a shift in the Sino-Russian relations. Joseph Nye, a former US assistant secretary of defense and chairman of the US National Intelligence Council, argues that in the wake of the Cold War in 1991 “… de facto US-China alliance ended and a China-Russia rapprochement begun”. Indeed, the year of 1992 heard the political rhetoric about “pursuing a ‘constructive partnership’”, which was followed by 1996’s statements of “strategic partnership”, which resulted in a treaty of ‘friendship and cooperation” in 2001.

For as long as I can remember I have been told to constantly strive for more and never settle for less. It wasn’t until one day when I decided to chauffeur a few friends to a local creek that I began to change my personal opinion in regards to exceling in the workplace. During a conversation, my friends and I got on the topic on how each of us was doing. One of us said “I’m good, I’m not overwhelmed or underwhelmed.” and someone responded, “so you’re whelmed?” This simple and somewhat odd question caused me to think about things differently. I decided that the idea of “whelmed” can be defined as being completely content with the current state of your life and self, be it physically, mentally, emotionally, spiritually, and financially. The idea of being “whelmed” caused me to wonder why it isn’t okay, to just be okay. I believe that the society that we live in has conditioned us to believe that more is better and happiness is only achieved when you have the most recent top of the line inanimate object and enough left over money to splurge on things you don’t need. That way of thinking has caused America to become an individualistic society. You hear the phrases “This is a dog eat dog world” and “fend for yourself” and it shows that there is an underlying drive to make it to the “top”. And once you finally get to the top that is when you are successful. But if you’re not fighting to get there then you are doing something wrong. This nonstop fight to excel in the workplace