4.1 e-Book to enhance pharmaceutical learning As illustrated in “Section 1 - Identify students weakness - Concepts”(Pg 12), the bar chart that compared all the questions has showed a decreased number of “Strongly Agree + Agree” and an increased number of “Strongly Disagree + Disagree” in question 3, question 5 and question 9 in comparison to other questions. These results from section 1 showed students expressed least understanding in the following areas : Q3, The concept of volume of distribution (VD) Q5, How the concepts of clearance, half-life and rate constants, volume and area under the curve integrate with each other. Q9. Applying pharmacokinetics data to alter drug regimens in patients Looking at the result for “Section 2 - Understanding parameters in Single Dosing Therapeutics”(Pg14) and “Section 3 - Understanding parameters in Multiple Dosing Therapeutics” (Pg18). The bar charts for each questions all shared a similar distribution. Single dosing therapeutics questions and answers were combined and compared together in “Section 2: Identify student weakness - Understanding parameters in Single Dosing Therapeutics” (Pg 15), the distribution of responses between those questions were very similar (e.g the number of “YES” responses for Q10 is very similar to the Q11). The same scenario also happened when multiple dosing therapeutics questions and answers were combined and compared together in “Section 3: Identify student weakness - Understanding parameters in
The short quizzes for each lesson in this section are not comprehensive and not very
Lack of comprehension and poor course work will result in a lower grade average. Students may become frustrated and give up easily.
can be deduced. It appears that more interventions are needed on student one at the
3) What do the rate of change values you just calculated represent? Why are some positive and some negative?
According to Table 1.2, the following categories fell within close range to the mean: number sense, attends to print, basic reading, articulation, communication (receptive), matching, pre-writing, colors, and shapes. It is evident through this data analysis that most students are at the emerging stage of ability levels, implicating that they require some level of prompting to ensure they produce a correct response. It is concluded that students require continued instruction with addition, reading, and working independently are skills that require continued instruction. Division, multiplication, graphing, and telling time were areas that all students found to be the most challenging, thus these findings confirmed my original assumptions,
accurately measure a student’s knowledge and that these tests fail to assess the full potential of the student (Evans, Ashman).
The below chart depicts how questions 1-10 were answered. Based on the color-coded responses, it is apparent that most employees have answered 2, which is closest to ‘very negative.’ This chart helps one to understand that the overall vibe of the employees is more negative than positive. Charts of this nature can be beneficial to the organization to analyze data visually. Based on our other research, the most common response from the employees is option 2, which is aligned with negative input.
(Strongly disagree = 1, Disagree = 2, Somewhat disagree = 3, Neutral = 4 Somewhat agree = 5, Agree = 6 and Strongly agree = 7). The lower the mean, the stronger the disagreement with the statement; and the higher the mean, the stronger the agreement with the statement). N = The total number of responses
My first observation was a 5th grade general education class consisting of 25 students. I spent more time with the 5th grade class since the middle school student’s move from class to class. My second observation at Ps 181 was in the middle school 6th grade general-ed with inclusion. Both classrooms were filled with themes, books in accordance to
based on the latest evidence base and in line with hospital policy and is done so following telephone discussion with a doctor as there will be no one to check the accuracy of that prescription at night. Through the use of electronic prescribing my choice of drugs and drug doses will be influenced. Another major influence in the decision to prescribe is my own level of knowledge and competence and by ensuring that all prescribing is carried out in accordance with my own scope of professional practice to ensure patient safety. As suggested by Spicer (2006) professional autonomy when prescribing will be limited by the use of guidelines and protocols, however these guidelines support safe prescribing and the protection of the patients in our
If I was a Physician that worked in a doctor’s office, I would have nothing but great things to say about e-Prescribing. If my supervisor asked me to present five positive aspects to my team, I would have no problem at all. E-Prescribing is a great new peak in technology that essentially will make the lives of physicians easier. Doctor’s offices are always packed with many people waiting on appointments and e-Prescribing will allow for appointments to run more smoothly, on time, and with less mistakes. The first positive point that I would make about this new technology is that it makes it easier to verify insurance. The tools presented within this system allow for physicians to see what type of medications the patients insurance will cover.
3. Unclear instructions and 'unstable' syllabus: The syllabus changed its grading part. The weight of teaching portfolio increased to 20% in total grades. However, the teaching did not mention that in class neither canvas did not reflect this change. Another example is that the instruction is not clear. A paper assignment's e max page should be 3-4 pages. It is difficult for me to
In addition, students achievement needs are not met especially the sp. ed. and ESL student whose academic levels fall below average students. Some students basic language foundation were not met for whatever reason, thus they are performing two or three grade levels below their actual grade.
According to the calculations, 46.2% of the questions were basic remembering questions, 38.5% of the questions were tier 2 “understanding” questions, 7.7% of the questions were tier 3 “applying”
First of all, I had initially deemed question six to be a bad question, when I assessed my pretest because only two of my students answered it correctly. However on the post test, this category saw significant growth moving from two correct answers to eight, and the girls went from a average score of one out of six to a three out of six, and the boys went from an average score of zero out of six to two out of six. Even though I was not able to teach this topic successfully the way I had anticipated, it showed me that I was still successful to a small handful of students.