In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular In the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually twoyears, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the"residual value," computed as 60% Df the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the retumed cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lostan average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value).Suppose two customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whetherkeep (andpurchase at 60% of the new car price) their cars or return thelr cars. Two years ago, Becky leased a car valued new at $18,500. If she returns the car,the manufacturer could likely get $12,950 at auction for the car. Eleen also leased a car, valued new at $19,000, two years ago. If she returns the car,the manufacturer could likely get $9500 at auction for the car,Use the following table to Indicate whether each buyer is more Iikely to purchase or retum the car.BuyerKeep and Purchase CarReturn CarBeckyEleenThe manufacturer will lose money (at auction, relative to the residual value of the car) Ifreturns the car Instead of keeping andpurchasing it.True or False: Setting a more accurate residual price of each car would help attenuate the problems of adverse selection.O TrueO False

Opportunity costs address the potential advantages that an individual, financial backer, or business…

cdon. In 1999, manufacturers lost $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whether to keep (and D% of the new car price) their cars or return their cars. Two years ago, Becky leased a car valued new at $18,500. If she returns the car, urer could likely get $12,950 at auction for the car. Eleen also leased a car, valued new at $19,000, two years ago. If she returns the car, rer could likely get $9,500 at auction for the car, Ing table to Indicate whether each buyer is more Iskely to purchase or retum the car. ep and Purchase Car Return Car urer will lose money (at auction, relative to the resldual value of the car) if V returns the car Instead of keeping and Setting a more accurate residual price of each car would help attenuate the problems of adverse selection.

cdon. In 1999, manufacturers lost $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whether to keep (and D% of the new car price) their cars or return their cars. Two years ago, Becky leased a car valued new at $18,500. If she returns the car, urer could likely get $12,950 at auction for the car. Eleen also leased a car, valued new at $19,000, two years ago. If she returns the car, rer could likely get $9,500 at auction for the car, Ing table to Indicate whether each buyer is more Iskely to purchase or retum the car. ep and Purchase Car Return Car urer will lose money (at auction, relative to the resldual value of the car) if V returns the car Instead of keeping and Setting a more accurate residual price of each car would help attenuate the problems of adverse selection.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter19: The Problem Of Adverse Selection

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 19.1IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the “residual value,” computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, the manufacturer lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). Why was the manufacturer losing money on this program? What should the manufacturer do to stop losing money (while still leasing cars)?
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the “residual value,” computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, the manufacturer lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). Why was the manufacturer losing money on this program? What should the manufacturer do to stop losing money?
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the “residual value,” computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). Suppose two customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whether to keep (and purchase at 60% of the new car price) their cars or return their cars. Two years ago, Dina leased a car valued new at $19,000. If she returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get $13,300 at auction for the car. Gilberto also leased a car, valued new at $13,000, two years ago. If he returns the…
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the “residual value,” computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). Suppose two customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whether to keep (and purchase at 60% of the new car price) their cars or return their cars. Two years ago, Susan leased a car that was valued new at $14,500. If she returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get $7,540 at auction for the car. Megan also leased a car, valued new at $15,500, two years ago. If she returns…
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the “residual value,” computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). Suppose two customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whether to keep (and purchase at 60% of the new car price) their cars or return their cars. Two years ago, Antonio leased a car that was valued new at $11,000. If he returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get $5,610 at auction for the car. Valerie also leased a car, valued new at $19,500, two years ago. If she…
When a famous painting becomes available for sale, it is often known which museum or collector will be the likely winner. Yet, the auctioneer actively woos representatives of other museums that have no chance of winning to attend anyway. Suppose a piece of art has recently become available for sale and will be auctioned off to the highest bidder, with the winner paying an amount equal to the second highest bid. Assume that most collectors know that Valerie places a value of $15,000 on the art piece and that she values this art piece more than any other collector. Suppose that if no one else shows up, Valerie simply bids $15,000/2=$7,500 and wins the piece of art. The expected price paid by Valerie, with no other bidders present, is $________.. Suppose the owner of the artwork manages to recruit another bidder, Antonio, to the auction. Antonio is known to value the art piece at $12,000. The expected price paid by Valerie, given the presence of the second bidder Antonio, is $_______. .
A drug company is considering investing $100 million today to bring a weight loss pill to the market. At the end of one year, the firm will know the payoff; there is a 0.50 probability that the pill will sell at a high price and generate $37 million per year of profit forever and a 0.50 probability that the pill will sell at a low price and generate $I million per year of profit forever. The interest rate is 10%. Suppose the firm decides to wait one year to determine whether the pill will sell at a high or low price. The firm will not invest if it learns that the pill will sell at a low price. What is the net present value of waiting one year to make the investment?O $88 millionO$122.72 millionO $201.22 millionO $64.5 million
HomeGrown is a small restaurant that specializes in serving local fruits, vegetables, and meats. The company has chosen to enter into a long-term relationship with Family Farms, a local farming operation. The two parties have decided to enter into a long-term contract, where Family Farms will supply produce to HomeGrown at specified prices and volume each year. Before signing a contract, HomeGrown is trying to decide how long the contract should be. It estimates that each year the contract covers saves the restaurant $1,000 in bargaining and opportunism costs. However, each year the contract covers also requires more legal fees. HomeGrown estimates that the number of hours required from lawyers, L, has a quadratic relationship with the number of years on the contract, so that L = Y2, where Y is the number of years for the contract. If HomeGrown’s lawyers charge $100 per hour, how long should the contract be?
A computer reseller needs to decide how many laptops to order next month. The lowest end laptop costs $220 and the retailer can sell these for $300. However, the laptop manufacturer already announced that they are coming out with a new model in a couple of months. Any laptops that will not be sold by the end of next month will have to be heavily discounted at half-price. The reseller also needs to consider that every time he fails to fulfill a laptop order, he stands to lose $25 for every unit. Based on the past months’ sales, the reseller estimates the demand probabilities for sales (S) as follows: P(0 units) = 0.3; P(1 units) = 0.4; P(2 units) = 0.2; P(3 units) =0.1. The reseller thinks it’s a good idea to conduct a survey on whether or not his customers are going to buy laptops and how many. The survey results will either be Yes (Y), No (N) or Don’t Know (DK). The probability estimates of the results based on the demand for number of units are: P(Y|S = 0 units) = 0.1 P(Y|S = 1…
A computer reseller needs to decide how many laptops to order next month. The lowest end laptop costs $220 and the retailer can sell these for $300. However, the laptop manufacturer already announced that they are coming out with a new model in a couple of months. Any laptops that will not be sold by the end of next month will have to be heavily discounted at half-price. The reseller also needs to consider that every time he fails to fulfill a laptop order, he stands to lose $25 for every unit. Based on the past months’ sales, the reseller estimates the demand probabilities for sales (S) as follows: P(0 units) = 0.3; P(1 units) = 0.4; P(2 units) = 0.2; P(3 units) =0.1. The reseller thinks it’s a good idea to conduct a survey on whether or not his customers are going to buy laptops and how many. The survey results will either be Yes (Y), No (N) or Don’t Know (DK). The probability estimates of the results based on the demand for number of units are: P(Y|S = 0 units) = 0.1 P(Y|S = 1…
A computer reseller needs to decide how many laptops to order next month. The lowest end laptop costs $220 and the retailer can sell these for $300. However, the laptop manufacturer already announced that they are coming out with a new model in a couple of months. Any laptops that will not be sold by the end of next month will have to be heavily discounted at half-price. The reseller also needs to consider that every time he fails to fulfill a laptop order, he stands to lose $25 for every unit. Based on the past months’ sales, the reseller estimates the demand probabilities for sales (S) as follows: P(0 units) = 0.3; P(1 units) = 0.4; P(2 units) = 0.2; P(3 units) =0.1. The reseller thinks it’s a good idea to conduct a survey on whether or not his customers are going to buy laptops and how many. The survey results will either be Yes (Y), No (N), or Don’t Know (DK). The probability estimates of the results based on the demand for the number of units are: P(Y|S = 0 units) = 0.1…
Your company has a customer who is shutting down a production line, and it is your responsibility to dispose of the extrusion machine. The company could keep it in inventory for a possible future product and estimates that the reservation value is $350,000. Your dealings on the secondhand market lead you to believe that if you commit to a price of $400,000, there is a 0.5 chance you will be able to sell the machine. If you commit to a price of $450,000, there is a 0.2 chance you will be able to sell the machine. If you commit to a price of $500,000, there is a 0.15 chance you will be able to sell the machine. These probabilities are summarized in the following table. For each posted price, enter the expected value of attempting to sell the machine at that price. (Hint: Be sure to take into account the value of the machine to your company in the event that you are not be able to sell the machine.) Posted Price Probability of Sale Expected Value ($) ($) $500,000…