d. What type of inhibition is exhibited against NAD* as a cofactor? Describe what is going on in this type of inhibition. e. Referring to the mechanism below, what step is pyrazole likely interfering with given your answers in c and d? 1. binding of NAD+ to the enzyme, LADH 2. binding of C₂H5OH to LADH 3. Oxidation of C₂H5OH (This is the reaction step) and product dissociation 4. Dissociation of NADH from LADH NAD+ + LADH NAD LADH + NAD C₂H5OH LADH C₂H5OH NADH LADH + NAD LADH k₂ k + NAD LADH C₂H5OH NADH LADH + NADH+ LADH CH3CHO+H*

Biochemistry
6th Edition
ISBN:9781305577206
Author:Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. Grisham
Publisher:Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. Grisham
Chapter27: Metabolic Integration And Organ Specialization
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 4P
icon
Related questions
Question

Answer for D, and E. The answers for A, B, and C are down below. 

3. Pyrozole has been proposed as a possible nontoxic inhibitor of LADH-catalyzed ethanol oxidation. Its
kinetics have been studied and, in 2 separate experiments, the velocity of the reaction was measured as a
function of [C₂H5OH] and of [NAD+]. The data is given in the tables below.
[C₂H5OH] varies, [LADH]= 4µg/ml, [NAD+] = 350 µM, pH=7.4, 23.5C
[C₂H5OH] Vo (relative
units)
Vo (relative units)
1x10-5 M pyrazole
M
No pyrazole
2.1
1.8
0.008
0.002
0.001
0.00067
1.5
1.35
Vo (relative
units)
No pyrazole
0.00011
1.7
0.000056
1.4
0.000033
1.3
0..000017 0.95
1.7
1.0
[NAD+] varies, [LADH]= 4µg/ml, [C₂H5OH]= 5 mM, pH=7.4, 23.5C
[NAD+]
Vo (relative units)
4x10-5 M pyrazole
0.69
0.52
0.85
0.71
0.63
0.47
a. Plot the data as Lineweaver-Burke plots on two separate graphs.
b. Determine the Km values for [C₂H5OH] and of [NAD*]. (You can't find Vmax because the exact units of Vo
are not provided)
c. What type of inhibition is exhibited by pyrazole against C₂H5OH is a substrate? Describe what is going on in
this type of inhibition.
2. binding of C₂H5OH to LADH
d. What type of inhibition is exhibited against NAD+ as a cofactor? Describe what is going on in this type of
inhibition.
e. Referring to the mechanism below, what step is pyrazole likely interfering with given your answers in c and
d?
1. binding of NAD+ to the enzyme, LADH
3. Oxidation of C₂H5OH (This is the reaction
step) and product dissociation
4. Dissociation of NADH from LADH
NAD + LADH = NAD LADH
k_1
NAD LADH + C₂H5OH
NAD
LADH C₂H5OH
NADH LADH
k2
2
NAD LADH C₂H5OH
ОН
NADH LADH +
NADH+LADH
CH3CHO+H*
Transcribed Image Text:3. Pyrozole has been proposed as a possible nontoxic inhibitor of LADH-catalyzed ethanol oxidation. Its kinetics have been studied and, in 2 separate experiments, the velocity of the reaction was measured as a function of [C₂H5OH] and of [NAD+]. The data is given in the tables below. [C₂H5OH] varies, [LADH]= 4µg/ml, [NAD+] = 350 µM, pH=7.4, 23.5C [C₂H5OH] Vo (relative units) Vo (relative units) 1x10-5 M pyrazole M No pyrazole 2.1 1.8 0.008 0.002 0.001 0.00067 1.5 1.35 Vo (relative units) No pyrazole 0.00011 1.7 0.000056 1.4 0.000033 1.3 0..000017 0.95 1.7 1.0 [NAD+] varies, [LADH]= 4µg/ml, [C₂H5OH]= 5 mM, pH=7.4, 23.5C [NAD+] Vo (relative units) 4x10-5 M pyrazole 0.69 0.52 0.85 0.71 0.63 0.47 a. Plot the data as Lineweaver-Burke plots on two separate graphs. b. Determine the Km values for [C₂H5OH] and of [NAD*]. (You can't find Vmax because the exact units of Vo are not provided) c. What type of inhibition is exhibited by pyrazole against C₂H5OH is a substrate? Describe what is going on in this type of inhibition. 2. binding of C₂H5OH to LADH d. What type of inhibition is exhibited against NAD+ as a cofactor? Describe what is going on in this type of inhibition. e. Referring to the mechanism below, what step is pyrazole likely interfering with given your answers in c and d? 1. binding of NAD+ to the enzyme, LADH 3. Oxidation of C₂H5OH (This is the reaction step) and product dissociation 4. Dissociation of NADH from LADH NAD + LADH = NAD LADH k_1 NAD LADH + C₂H5OH NAD LADH C₂H5OH NADH LADH k2 2 NAD LADH C₂H5OH ОН NADH LADH + NADH+LADH CH3CHO+H*
Step 1
Since you have posted a question with multiple sub parts, we will provide the solution only to the first
three sub parts as per our Q&A guidelines. Please repost the remaining sub parts separately.
Step 2
3. (a) The Lineweaver Burk Plot for C₂H5OH in presence and absence of inhibitor is as follows:
[$]
Vo (no hinhibitor) Vo (with inhibitor) 1/[5]
1/Vo (no inhibitor)
1/Vo (with inhibitor)
0.008
0.002
0.001
0.00067
0.00011
0.000056
0.000033
0.000017
--62000
0.008
0.002
0.001
0.00067
2.1
1.8
1.5
1.35
4
0.00011
0.000056
0.000033
0.000017
-1/Km
-1/Km-1600
=> Km = 1/1600
1.7
14
1.3
0.95
-42000
The Lineweaver Burk Plot for NAD* in presence and absence of inhibitor is as follows:
[s]
Vo (no inhibitor) Vo (with inhibitor)
1/[5]
1/Vo (no inhibitor)
-1/Km
↓
-62000
-1600-1400-1200-1000 -800 60400-2000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
1/[5]
2.1
1.8
1.5
1.35
1.7
1
0.69
0.52
-22000
1.7
2
1.3
0.95
2.5
-42000
0.85
0.71
0.63
0.47
1.5
-22000
0.5
25
2
35
As
2
1
0
-2000
Step 3
(b) From the Lineweaver Burk plot, we can find the Km. For C₂H5OH, the graph will be:
[S]
Vo (no hinhibitor) Vo (with inhibitor)
1/[5]
1/Vo (no inhibitor)
1.7
0.69
0.52
1
0.85
0.71
2.5
-1/km
0.63
0.47
0.5
125
500
1000
1492.537313
2.5
1/[5]
1
2
5
Os
-1/Vo (no inhibitor)
-1/Vo (with inhibitor)
9090.909091
17857.14286
30303.0303
58823.52941
1/Vo (no inhibitor)
1/Vo (with inhibitor)
=> Km = 0.000625 M
Therefore, Km for C₂H5OH will be 0.000625 M.
From the Lineweaver Burk plot, we can find the Km. For NAD+, the graph will be:
[s]
Vo (no inhibitor)
Vo (with inhibitor)
1/[S]
1/Vo (no inhibitor)
0
-2000
18000
0
-1600-1400-1200-1000-800 60400-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
4
1/[S]
1492.537313
125
500
1000
From graph, we can see that the line intersects X-axis at a point. In case of C₂H5OH when no inhibitor is
used,
1/Vmax
WAS THIS HELPFUL?
38000
0.476190476
0.555555556
0.666666667
0.740740741
9090.909091
17857.14286
30303.0303
58823.52941
→1/Vo (no inhibitor)
➡1/Vo (with inhibitor)
+1/Vo (no inhibitor)
1/[5]
1/Vo (with inhibitor)
1/Vmax
0.588235294
0.714285714
0.769230769
1.052631579
1/Vmax
58000
18000
0.476190476
0.555555556
0.666666667
0.740740741
38000
1/Vo (with inhibitor)
0.588235294
1.449275362
1.923076923
0.588235294
0.714285714
0.769230769
1.052631579
58000
1.176470588
1.408450704
1.587301587
2.127659574
78000
1
1/Vo (with inhibitor)
0.588235294
1.449275362
1.923076923
1/Vo (with inhibitor)
1
1.176470588
1.408450704
78000
1.587301587
2.127659574
From graph, we can see that the line intersects X-axis at a point. In case of NAD+ when no inhibitor is
used,
-1/Km =-62000
=> Km = 1/62000
=> Km = 0.00001613 M
Therefore, Km for NAD+ will be 0.00001613 M.
Step 4
(c) To find the type of inhibition, we have to observe the Km. We know the Km for C₂H5OH is 0.000625 M.
The Km for C₂H5OH in presence of inhibitor will be:
1/Km = -400
=>Km=1/400
=>Km = 0.0025 M.
Since, the Km of C₂H5OH in presence of inhibitor is more than the Km of C₂H5OH in absence of inhibitor,
the inhibition is competitive inhibitor.
In competitive inhibitor, the inhibitor is binding to the substrate binding site. As a result, maximum
velocity decreases. Thus, higher concentration of substrate is required to attain maximum velocity in
presence of inhibitor. Hence, the km increases.
Transcribed Image Text:Step 1 Since you have posted a question with multiple sub parts, we will provide the solution only to the first three sub parts as per our Q&A guidelines. Please repost the remaining sub parts separately. Step 2 3. (a) The Lineweaver Burk Plot for C₂H5OH in presence and absence of inhibitor is as follows: [$] Vo (no hinhibitor) Vo (with inhibitor) 1/[5] 1/Vo (no inhibitor) 1/Vo (with inhibitor) 0.008 0.002 0.001 0.00067 0.00011 0.000056 0.000033 0.000017 --62000 0.008 0.002 0.001 0.00067 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.35 4 0.00011 0.000056 0.000033 0.000017 -1/Km -1/Km-1600 => Km = 1/1600 1.7 14 1.3 0.95 -42000 The Lineweaver Burk Plot for NAD* in presence and absence of inhibitor is as follows: [s] Vo (no inhibitor) Vo (with inhibitor) 1/[5] 1/Vo (no inhibitor) -1/Km ↓ -62000 -1600-1400-1200-1000 -800 60400-2000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 1/[5] 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.35 1.7 1 0.69 0.52 -22000 1.7 2 1.3 0.95 2.5 -42000 0.85 0.71 0.63 0.47 1.5 -22000 0.5 25 2 35 As 2 1 0 -2000 Step 3 (b) From the Lineweaver Burk plot, we can find the Km. For C₂H5OH, the graph will be: [S] Vo (no hinhibitor) Vo (with inhibitor) 1/[5] 1/Vo (no inhibitor) 1.7 0.69 0.52 1 0.85 0.71 2.5 -1/km 0.63 0.47 0.5 125 500 1000 1492.537313 2.5 1/[5] 1 2 5 Os -1/Vo (no inhibitor) -1/Vo (with inhibitor) 9090.909091 17857.14286 30303.0303 58823.52941 1/Vo (no inhibitor) 1/Vo (with inhibitor) => Km = 0.000625 M Therefore, Km for C₂H5OH will be 0.000625 M. From the Lineweaver Burk plot, we can find the Km. For NAD+, the graph will be: [s] Vo (no inhibitor) Vo (with inhibitor) 1/[S] 1/Vo (no inhibitor) 0 -2000 18000 0 -1600-1400-1200-1000-800 60400-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 4 1/[S] 1492.537313 125 500 1000 From graph, we can see that the line intersects X-axis at a point. In case of C₂H5OH when no inhibitor is used, 1/Vmax WAS THIS HELPFUL? 38000 0.476190476 0.555555556 0.666666667 0.740740741 9090.909091 17857.14286 30303.0303 58823.52941 →1/Vo (no inhibitor) ➡1/Vo (with inhibitor) +1/Vo (no inhibitor) 1/[5] 1/Vo (with inhibitor) 1/Vmax 0.588235294 0.714285714 0.769230769 1.052631579 1/Vmax 58000 18000 0.476190476 0.555555556 0.666666667 0.740740741 38000 1/Vo (with inhibitor) 0.588235294 1.449275362 1.923076923 0.588235294 0.714285714 0.769230769 1.052631579 58000 1.176470588 1.408450704 1.587301587 2.127659574 78000 1 1/Vo (with inhibitor) 0.588235294 1.449275362 1.923076923 1/Vo (with inhibitor) 1 1.176470588 1.408450704 78000 1.587301587 2.127659574 From graph, we can see that the line intersects X-axis at a point. In case of NAD+ when no inhibitor is used, -1/Km =-62000 => Km = 1/62000 => Km = 0.00001613 M Therefore, Km for NAD+ will be 0.00001613 M. Step 4 (c) To find the type of inhibition, we have to observe the Km. We know the Km for C₂H5OH is 0.000625 M. The Km for C₂H5OH in presence of inhibitor will be: 1/Km = -400 =>Km=1/400 =>Km = 0.0025 M. Since, the Km of C₂H5OH in presence of inhibitor is more than the Km of C₂H5OH in absence of inhibitor, the inhibition is competitive inhibitor. In competitive inhibitor, the inhibitor is binding to the substrate binding site. As a result, maximum velocity decreases. Thus, higher concentration of substrate is required to attain maximum velocity in presence of inhibitor. Hence, the km increases.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Biochemistry
Biochemistry
Biochemistry
ISBN:
9781305577206
Author:
Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. Grisham
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
Biology
ISBN:
9781305389892
Author:
Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning