Do the poor spend more time in the shower than the rich? The results of a survey asking poor and rich people how many minutes they spend in the shower are shown below. Poor 23 21 12 32 32 25 18 33 31 12 40 10 Rich: 20 16 3. 15 22 13 18 25 14 Assume both follow a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.01 level of significance level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer vSelect an answer V Select an answer v (please enter a decimal) H: Select an answer vSelect an answer Select an answer v(Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ?v = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) c. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) d. The p-value is 2 v a e. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Do the poor spend more time in the shower than the rich? The results of a survey asking poor and rich
people how many minutes they spend in the shower are shown below.
Poor 23
21
8.
12
32
32
25
18
33
31
12
40
10
Rich: 20
16
3
6.
15
22
13
18
25
14
3
0.01 level of significance
Assume both follow a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a =
level of significance?
For this study, we should use Select an answer
a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho:Select an answer V
Select an answer V
Select an answer v (please enter a decimal)
H
Select an answer v
Select an answer
Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal)
b. The test statistic ? v
(please showyour answer to 3 decimal places.)
c. The p-value-
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
d. The p-value is ? va
e. Based on this, we should Select an answer vthe null hypothesis.
f. Thus, the final conclusion is that
The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant
evidence to conclude that the population mean time in the shower for the poor is equal to the
!!
population mean time in the shower for the rich.
The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the mean time in the shower for the thirteen poor people that were surveyed is more than
the mean time in the shower for the twelve rich people that were surveyed.
OThe results are statistically significant at a = 0,01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the population mean time in the shower for the poor is more than the population mean
time in the shower for the rich.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a - 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to
conclude that the population mean time in the shower for the poor is more than the population
mean time in the shower for the rich.
Transcribed Image Text:Do the poor spend more time in the shower than the rich? The results of a survey asking poor and rich people how many minutes they spend in the shower are shown below. Poor 23 21 8. 12 32 32 25 18 33 31 12 40 10 Rich: 20 16 3 6. 15 22 13 18 25 14 3 0.01 level of significance Assume both follow a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho:Select an answer V Select an answer V Select an answer v (please enter a decimal) H Select an answer v Select an answer Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ? v (please showyour answer to 3 decimal places.) c. The p-value- (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) d. The p-value is ? va e. Based on this, we should Select an answer vthe null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time in the shower for the poor is equal to the !! population mean time in the shower for the rich. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time in the shower for the thirteen poor people that were surveyed is more than the mean time in the shower for the twelve rich people that were surveyed. OThe results are statistically significant at a = 0,01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time in the shower for the poor is more than the population mean time in the shower for the rich. O The results are statistically insignificant at a - 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time in the shower for the poor is more than the population mean time in the shower for the rich.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman