Generally speaking, smaller countries tend to trade more than larger countries because: Select one: OA. Smaller countries lack the required level of competitiveness. O B. Smaller countries efficiently produce a wide range of goods. OC. Smaller countries lack the required economies of scope. D. Smaller countries lack the required economies of scale.

Generally speaking, smaller countries tend to trade more than larger countries because: Select one: OA. Smaller countries lack the required level of competitiveness. O B. Smaller countries efficiently produce a wide range of goods. OC. Smaller countries lack the required economies of scope. D. Smaller countries lack the required economies of scale.

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter28: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You just overheard your friend say the following: Poor countries like Malawi have no absolute advantages. They have poor soil, low investments in formal education and hence low-skill workers, no capital, and no natural resources to speak of. Because they have no advantage, they cannot benefit from trade. How would you respond?
Brazil can produce 100 pounds of beef or 10 autos. In contrast the United States can produce 40 pounds of beef or 30 autos. Which country has the absolute advantage in beef? Which country has the absolute advantage in producing autos? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef In Brazil? What is the opportunity cost of producing one pound of beef in the United States?
Answer th following: If Nation 2 is to enter trade. In what good will it specialize? Why? If Nation 2 is to specialize in the good of its comparative advantage, how much good X and good Y will Nation 2 produce? Suppose after specialization, Nation 2 exports 100 units of the good of its comparative advantage [your answer in 1], how much of X and Y will it consumer after trade Will Nation 2 enjoy welfare gains from trade? Provide evidence
c) Now, assume that each country has to use its own labour to transport goods from the other country. Suppose that it takes 1 worker to bring an imported unit of the good Northland specializes in, into Southland. Also, suppose that it takes 1 worker to bring an imported unit of the good Southland specialises in, into Northland. Will trade take place? Explain
Draw the production possibility curve for each country using the data provided in the table. b. Which country has an absolute advantage in what product? Which country has a comparative advantage in what product? Show your work! c. Without trade, what is the price of food in terms of computers for both countries? Showyour work! d. What is the range of prices (i.e., the CPC) at which trade can occur? Also, show (a) the possible CPC for each country and (b) the possible production and consumption possibility lines for both countries after trade. Show your work!
On his first day in office, President Donald Trump took the United States out of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed free trade deal with 11 other countries in the Asia-Pacific region, representing nearly 40% of global GDP. If the TPP had come into existence, the countries in the TPP would NOT be in violation of the most-favored nation (MFN) principle in the World Trade Organization (WTO) by giving each other preferential trade access. Why? A. There is an exception to MFN regarding the Generalized System of Preferences. Because Vietnam, a developing country, was one of the 12 members of the TPP, that exception applies to the whole partnership. B. Because the United States has the largest economy in the world, it gets to decide when MFN applies and when it doesn’t. C. There is an exception to MFN regarding regional trade agreements (RTA), and because all the proposed members inhabit the Asia-Pacific region, the TPP would have been an RTA, and therefore, members could give…
It has been shown that the US has a comparative advantage in capital-intensive goods while China has a comparative advantage in labour-intensive goods. Suppose as a result of trade the US's economy is going to grow by 30% and that of China by 40%. Based on this information, which of the following statements is correct? a) The US has the stronger bargaining power in the determination of the relative price after trade. b) In the US, the employers are better off while the workers are worse off as a result of trade. c) Specialization means that China will produce all the capital-intensive goods. d) China has the stronger bargaining power in the determination of the relative price after trade.
Trade between individuals and between nations leads to: O Increased specialization O Lower living standards Higher product prices Greater self-sufficiency
Q. 4 If the production possibilities frontier of one the trade partners ( " Country A " ) is bowed out ( concave to the origin ) , then increased specialization in production by that country will * O. increase the economic welfare of only Country A. O. decrease the economic welfare of Country A. O. increase the economic welfare of both countries. O. decrease the economic welfare of Country B.
Z and S.A are trading partners. Both produce metal ores (including lithium) and delivery trucks. Now suppose that if Zimbabwe uses all of its resources, it can produce 50,000 tons of metal ores or 100,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). Suppose that if South Africa uses all of its resources, it can produce 20,000 tons of metal ores or 80,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). What is the direction of the trade (who exports what to whom)? Be sure to give the opportunity costs of production of both goods for both countries.
2. American and Japanese workers can each produce 4 cars a year. An American worker can produce 10 tons of grain a year, whereas a Japanese worker can produce 5 tons of grain a year. To keep things simple, assume that each country has 100 million workers. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing cars? In producing grain? Without trade, half of each country’s workers produce cars and half produce grain. What quantities of cars and grain does each country produce? Starting from a position without trade, give an example in which trade makes each country better off.
Suppose that Egypt produces cotton and lamb, and that it has comparative advantage in cotton. Draw Eqypt's non-linear (i.e., concave) PPF and FTBL, with cotton on the horizontal axis and lamb on the vertical axis. Be sure to label the axes, the PPF, the FTBL and the autarky and free trade prices. Also show the quantities of imports and exports. (Note, there are no values for the prices, so just show the price ratio and how it's represented in the graph.)