In clinical trails of Nasonex, 3774 adult and adolenscent allergy patients 12 years and older were randomly divided into two groups. The patient in group1 (experimental group) received 200 microgram of Nasonex, while the patient in group 2( control group) receiced a placebo. Of the 2103 patients in the experimental group 547 reported headaches as a side effect. Of the 1671 patients in the control group, 368 reported headaches as a side effect. Determine if the proportion of those taking Nasonex who experienced headaches as a side effect differs from that of those taking the placebo who experienced headaches as a side effect. A) state the null and alternative hypothese: B) construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference between these groups round to 4 places. Intervals: C)using intervals, state conclusion in the language of the problem.

In clinical trails of Nasonex, 3774 adult and adolenscent allergy patients 12 years and older were randomly divided into two groups. The patient in group1 (experimental group) received 200 microgram of Nasonex, while the patient in group 2( control group) receiced a placebo. Of the 2103 patients in the experimental group 547 reported headaches as a side effect. Of the 1671 patients in the control group, 368 reported headaches as a side effect. Determine if the proportion of those taking Nasonex who experienced headaches as a side effect differs from that of those taking the placebo who experienced headaches as a side effect. A) state the null and alternative hypothese: B) construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference between these groups round to 4 places. Intervals: C)using intervals, state conclusion in the language of the problem.

Name: In clinical trails of Nasonex, 3774 adult and adolenscent allergy pati
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: In clinical trails of Nasonex, 3774 adult and adolenscent allergy patients 12 years and older were randomly divided into two groups. The patient in group1 (experimental group) received 200 microgram of Nasonex, while the patient in group 2( control

Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012

1st Edition

ISBN:9780547587776

Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL

Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL

Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8CR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine, infants were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second dose, 126 of 387 subjects in the experimental group (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. After the second dose, 158 of 574 of the subjects in the control group (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced drowsiness as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the α=0.01 level of significance? Verify the model requirements. Select all that apply. A. The sample size is less than 5% of the population size for each sample. B. n1p11−p1≥10 and n2p21−p2≥10 C. The samples are dependent. D. The sample size is more than 5% of the population size for each sample. E. The samples are independent. F. The data come…
In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine, rats were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second dose, 111 of 670 subjects in the experimental group (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. After the second dose, 68 of 551 of the subjects in the control group (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced drowsiness as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the α=0.05 level of significance? a. Find the test statistic for this hypothesis test. Round to two decimal places as needed.
Twenty middle-aged men with glucose readings between 90 milligrams per deciliter and 120 milligrams per deciliter of blood were selected randomly from the population of similar male patients at a large local hospital. Ten of the 20 men were assigned randomly to group A and received a placebo. The other 10 men were assigned to group B and received a new glucose drug. After two months, posttreatment glucose readings were taken for all 20 men and were compared with pretreatment readings. The reduction in glucose level (Pretreatment reading − Posttreatment reading) for each man in the study is shown here. Group A (placebo) reduction (in milligrams per deciliter): 12, 8, 17, 7, 20, 2, 5, 9, 12, 6 Group B (glucose drug) reduction (in milligrams per deciliter): 29, 31, 13, 19, 21, 5, 24, 12, 8, 21 Part A: Do the data provide convincing evidence, at the α = 0.02 level, that the glucose drug is effective in producing a reduction in mean glucose level? Part B: Create and interpret a 98%…
A random sample of 50 suspension helmets used by motorcycle riders and automobile race-car drivers was subjected to an impact test, and on 18 of these helmets some damage was observed.
A researcher randomly selected a sample of n = 500 individuals from a population with µ = 120 and administered an experimental treatment to the sample. What the researcher should expect if the treatment has no significant effect?
A double-blind randomized experiment compared the effects of the drug Lorcaserin and a placebo on weight loss in overweight adults. All subjects were also required to undergo diet and exercise counseling. The study involved 1000 participants where half of them would take Lorcaserin and half the placebo. The researchers found that after a year the treatment group had an average weight loss of 5.8 kg while the placebo group had an average weight loss of 3.9 carmona, kg. Based on this information researchers need to decide if Locarserin can be a possible treatment for weight loss. a. What would be a Type I error in this context? Your answer should consist of both the researchers’ decision and what the reality is. b. What would be a Type II error in this context? Your answer should consist of both the researchers’ decision and what the reality is.
In a randomized double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine children were randomly divided into two groups subjects in group one received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine after the second dose 112 of 690 subjects in the experimental group 1 experienced drowsiness as a side effect after the second dose 69 of 571 of the subjects in the control group 2 experienced drowsiness as a side effect does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experience drowsiness as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at 0.05 level of significance? Determine the null and alternative hypothesis? find the test statistic for this hypothesis test? determine the P value for this hypothesis test? do we reject or not reject the null hypothesis and why? State your conclusion?
In clinical trials of Nasonex, 3774 adult and adolescent allergy patients were randomly divided into two groups.The patients in group 1 received 200?g of Nasonex, while the patients in group 2 received a placebo. Of the 2103patients in the experimental group, 547 reported headaches as a side effect. Of the 1671 patients in the controlgroup, 368 reported headaches as a side effect. Is there significant evidence to conclude that the proportion ofNasonex users who experienced headaches as a side effect is greater than the proportion in the control group atthe ? = 0.05 level of significance?a.) Verify that the requirements for inference about two population proportions is satisfied.b.) What is the Null and Alternative Hypotheses? What test will you be using?c.) What is the level of significance and the ?-value?
In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine, children were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. After the second dose, 116 of 651 subjects in the experimental group (group 1) experienced fever as a side effect. After the second dose, 73 of 532 of the subjects in the control group (group 2) experienced fever as a side effect. Does the evidence suggest that a higher proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced fever as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the α=0.10 level of significance? #1 Find the test statistic for this hypothesis test.
A consumer advocacy group wanted to study whether different airline carriers differed in terms of their delayed flights. In particular, the researchers were interested in the relationship between p1, the proportion of Alpha Airlines flights that were delayed at least 15 minutes, and p2, the proportion of Beta Airlines flights that were delayed at least 15 minutes. A random sample of 1,000 Alpha flights and a separate random sample of 1,000 Beta flights found that 67 of the Alpha fights and 160 of the Beta flights were delayed at least 15 minutes. The conditions for inference were checked and verified. Does this set of samples provide strong evidence that Alpha Airlines has a smaller proportion of flights that are delayed at least 15 minutes than Beta Airlines, at the α = 0.05 significance level? Find the z-table here. A. The test statistic is z = –6.56 and the P-value ≈ 0. Since the P-value ≈ 0 < 0.05, there is not sufficient evidence that Alpha Airlines has fewer delayed…
A well-known study of 22,000 male physicians was conducted to determine if taking aspirin daily reduces the chances of a heart attack. Half of the physicians were given a regular dose of aspirin while the other half was given placebos. Six years later, among those who took aspirin, 104 suffered heart attacks while among those who took placebos, 189 suffered heart attacks. Does it appear that the aspirin can reduce the number of heart attacks among the sample group that took aspirin? Use α = 0.05.
A hearing specialist conducts a study on hearing loss at certain frequencies among a group of patients in a retirement community. Of 94 residents tested, 10 had significant hearing loss at low frequencies but not high, 40 had a significant loss at high frequencies but not low, and 26 showed no significant hearing loss at all. How many residents had hearing loss at both low and high frequencies?