In our one country model of technology growth, y = A(1- γA). Suppose that the country temporarily raises its level of γA. (a) Draw two graphs, one for y and one for A, showing how the time paths of output per worker (y) and productivity (A) will compare under this scenario with what would have happened if there had been no change in γA Please do fast ASAP fast

In our one country model of technology growth, y = A(1- γA). Suppose that the country temporarily raises its level of γA. (a) Draw two graphs, one for y and one for A, showing how the time paths of output per worker (y) and productivity (A) will compare under this scenario with what would have happened if there had been no change in γA Please do fast ASAP fast

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter20: Economic Growth In The Global Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In 1998, Brazil had a per capita GDP of about $4,500, compared to per capita GDP of about $28,000 in the US. (A) If per capita growth were to average 2% per year indefinitely in the US and 5% per year in Brazil, how many years would it take Brazil to catch up with the US? (B) Using the assumptions of the Cobb-Douglas production function, how fast would capital stock have to grow for per capita GDP to rise 5% per year? How does that compare with capital stock growth of 3% per year in the US (assume technology advances 1% per year in both countries)? (C) In mature industrialized societies, the capital/output ratio is approximately 3.0. If the average depreciation rate is 0.04, what would be the current saving and investment ratio in the US? What would it be in Brazil if per capita GDP rose 5% per year?
The key distinction between the views of Thomas Malthus and Esther Boserup on the relation between population growth and technological innovation is:a) Malthus and Boserup both regard population growth as exogenous in driving innovation, but Boserup emphasizes the ‘passion between the sexes’, while Malthus emphasizes human ingenuity b) Malthus and Boserup both regard population growth as exogenous in driving innovation, but Malthus emphasizes the ‘passion between the sexes’, while Boserup emphasizes human ingenuity c) Malthus regards population growth as exogenously driving technological innovation, while Boserup regards population growth as an endogenous response to innovationd) Boserup regards population growth as exogenously driving technological innovation, while Malthus regards population growth as an endogenous response to innovation
What has been the average annual growth rate of U.S. real GDP per person over the 120 years from 1900 to 2020? In which decade, beginning with the 1960s, was the growth of potential GDP per person greatest and slowest? Over the 120 years from 1900 to 2020, the average annual growth rate of U.S. real GDP per person is enter your response here percent.
Suppose that , the marginal product of efficiency units of labor, increases in the endogenous growth model. What effects does this have on the rates of growth and the levels of human capital, consumption, and output? Explain your results.
Based on article "Technology and economic growth: From Robert Solow to Paul Romer" by Rui Zhao, Romer has successfully opened the black box and explained how technology can be produced by an economy without having to rely on external (exogenous) technology. Using the central equations of the Romer’s model. discuss how technology (A)t can be produced by a country to stimulate economic growth?
If a country experiences real economic growth of 12% per year, it can go from being one of the poorest to one of the richest in Question 47 options: one generation. In the last couple of decades China’s growth rate has been higher than 12%. one generation. However, in the last couple of decades not even China’s growth rate has been this high. three generations. In the last 75 years China’s growth rate has been higher than 12%. three generations. However, in the last couple of decades not even China’s growth rate has been 12%.
What immediate consequence does an increase in education have in the endogenous growth model with human capital? What does it do in the long run?
Suppose country A's GDP per capital is $50,000 with yearly economic growth of 2.5% and country B's GDP per capital is $20,000 with annual economic growth of 4%. How many years will it take for country A to catch up with country B in terms of GDP per capital? please explain with steps.
Consider the simple innovation model. In this model, the society allocates a fraction "gamma" of workforce to innovation and the remaining fraction to production. Suppose that, for simplicity, total workforce is normalized to unity: L = 1. If the productivity growth rate is defined by d A_t / d t = "theta" * "gamma" * A_t and real GDP per worker by y_t = A_t * ( 1 - "gamma" ), what is the long-run growth rate of y_t ?
In the period of 1950-1973 the GDP average growth rate reached 9.3 % in Japan and approximately 4 % in USA. How this huge difference may be explained? Your arguments must be based on the growth theory and on the levels of GDP per capita both in Japan and USA in 1950 shown in the Madison table.
If in 2008 China’s real GDP is growing at 9 percent a year, its population is growing at 1 percent a year, and these growth rates continue, in what year will China’s real GDP per person be twice what it is in 2008 Please use the other formula to solve this proble not the rule of 70, because i have the solution using rule 70!
Based on article "Technology and economic growth: From Robert Solow to Paul Romer" by Rui Zhao, Solow mentioned technology (At) and capital per unit of effective labor (Kt) have a significant influence on a country's ability to “catch-up” or “converge” to a steady-state level (K*). Why did Solow model assume At as a black box in economics? Explain in brief.