Submit AllWhich statement is TRUE with regards to the use of tradable permits for controlling carbon emissions?The total amount of pollution would rise above the established cap if permit prices were set too high.Environmental groups that purchase tradable permits and do not use them will push the price of remaining permitslower.O Firms with lower costs of pollution abatement will demand more tradable permits.O Advancements in abatement technology will lead to a decline in the price of tradable permits.Activate WindowsGo to Settings to activate WindosQ市市市公e電后利口11/HDMLAPTOP LOGINHIGH DEFINITION MULTIMEDIA INTacerUSERNAME: studentRASSIA OD

In economics, tradable permits are the government provided rights to a firm to generate a specfiic…

Submit AL Which statement is TRUE with regards to the use of tradable permits for controlling carbon emissions? The total amount of pollution would rise above the established cap if permit prices were set too high. Environmental groups that purchase tradable permits and do not use them will push the price of remaining permits lower. Firms with lower costs of pollution abatement will demand more tradable permits. O Advancements in abatement technology will lead to a decline in the price of tradable permits.

Submit AL Which statement is TRUE with regards to the use of tradable permits for controlling carbon emissions? The total amount of pollution would rise above the established cap if permit prices were set too high. Environmental groups that purchase tradable permits and do not use them will push the price of remaining permits lower. Firms with lower costs of pollution abatement will demand more tradable permits. O Advancements in abatement technology will lead to a decline in the price of tradable permits.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter12: Environmental Protection And Negative Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13SCQ: A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoners dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can cheese whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two centuries. In Table 12.10, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.
A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals to clear some of Sherwoods forest and grow com, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. Table 12.11 shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why? In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?
Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of CO2 into the environment from manufacturing industries in the United States. In the first approach, the U.S. government makes it a policy to use only predetermined technologies. In the second approach, the U.S. government determines which technologies are cleaner and subsidizes their use. Of the two approaches, which is the command-and-control policy?
In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of pollution, called gunk. Table 12.14 shows possible combinations of economic output and reduction of gunk, depending on what kinds of environmental regulations you choose. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the percentage reduction of gunk, and with the quantity of economic output on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between K and L, can you say which one is better and why? In the choice between K. and N, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is move likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice L or M? Why?
How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created by low-income countries?
In a market without environmental regulations, will the supply curve for a film account for private costs, external costs, both, or neither? Explain.
Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Way or why not?
Refer to Table 12.2. The externality created by the refrigerator production was 100. However, once we accounted for both the private and additional external costs, the market price increased by only 50. If the external costs were 100 why did the price only increase by 50 when we accounted for all costs?
Suppose you want to put a dollar value on the external costs of carbon emissions from a power plant. What information or data would you obtain to measure the external [not social] cost?
Is zero pollution possible under a marketable permits system? Why or why not?
What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?
Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium, assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in public. Label the equilibrium private market price and quantity as Pm and Qm. Add whatever is needed to the model to show the impact of the negative externality from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as Fe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at the market output.