Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner’s dilemma of the sort studied in
- In Table 12.10, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 12 Solutions
Principles of Economics 2e
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Construction Accounting And Financial Management (4th Edition)
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th Edition)
Financial Accounting (12th Edition) (What's New in Accounting)
Principles of Management
Cost Accounting (15th Edition)
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
- Imagine a small town in a remote area where only two residents, Maria and Miguel, own dairies that produce milk that is safe to drink. Each week Maria and Miguel work together to decide how many gallons of milk to produce. They bring milk to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Maria and Miguel can produce as much milk as they want without cost so that the marginal cost is zero. The weekly town demand schedule and total revenue schedule for milk is shown in the table below: Quantity (in gallons) 10 |1 O b. $12 O c. $10 d. S8 2 113 14 לן 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 Price $24 $22 $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 Total Revenue (and Total Profit) $0 $22 $40 $54 $64 $70 $72 $70 $64 $54 $40 $22 $0 Refer to Table 17-3. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Maria and Miguel from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of milk once Maria and Miguel reach a Nash equilibrium? a. $14arrow_forwardThe Cartel Model: Iran and Iraq. For simplicity, let’s look at the production of just two members of the OPEC: Iran and Iraq. For further simplicity, let’s assume that there are only two production levels available: 2 or 4 million barrels of crude oil per day. Depending on their decision, the total output on the world market could be 4, 6, or 8 million barrels. Suppose the price could be $25, $15, and $10 per barrel respectively. Extraction costs are $2 per barrel in Iran and $4 per barrel in Iraq. a. Complete the payoff matrix (values in 000,000). Round up your answers to no decimals. Firm 2 Q = 2 Q = 4 Firm 1 Q = 2 , , Q = 4 , , b. The NE is(are): (Write A, B, C, D, or E) A. (Q = 2, Q = 2) B. (Q = 4, Q = 4) C. (Q = 2, Q = 4) D. (Q = 2, Q = 2) & A. (Q = 4, Q = 4) A. (Q = 4, Q = 2)arrow_forwardPlease show all work...arrow_forward
- 3.1 Do either of the two telecommunications firms have a dominant strategy in this interaction?If so, what are these dominant strategies? 3.2 What is the Nash Equilibrium of the game above? Clearly, show the logic you use to reachyour conclusion. What type of game is this? 3.3 Suppose the two firms could incentivize or punish each other, could the two firms find theirway to the socially optimum outcome? How would they do this? After observing the strategic interaction between Globogym and Average Joe’s, the governmentdecides to pass a law that states that the two terms must pre-commit to the quantities of trainingsessions they will supply to the American market.Market demand for training sessions is still modeled as ? = 400 − 0.2?, as before, and the marginalcost of production is constant at R40 per call. Let the number of sessions provided by Globogym berepresented by ?G and the quantity provided by Average Joe’s be represented by ?A. 3.4 Solve the firms’ reaction functions and…arrow_forwardConsider an oligopoly where firms sell differentiated goods and compete in prices. In this case the equilibrium prices charged by firms are too high relative to the collusive optimum price (the price that maximises joint profit). Is this true or false? Explain your answer by relating to the notion of externalityarrow_forwardAssume that the countries of Irun and Urun are the only two producers of crude oil. Further assume that both countries have entered into an agreement to maintain certain production levels in order to maximize profits. In the world market for oil, the demand curve is downward sloping. Refer to Scenario 16-1. The fact that both countries have colluded to earn higher profit shows their desire to keep production levels above the monopoly level of output. below the Nash equilibrium level of output. equal to the Nash equilibrium level of output above the Nash equilibrium level of output.arrow_forward
- consider an oligopoly where firms sell differentiated goods and compete in prices. in this case the equilibrium prices charged by firms are too high relative to the collusive optimum price (the price that maximizes joint profit). is this true or false? explain your answer by relating to the notion of externality.arrow_forwardWhat are the forms of strategic alliances and its advantages and disadvantages? In less than 70 wordsarrow_forwardA Prisoner's Dilemma occurs in military disputes when two countries use valuable resources to harm each other. True O Falsearrow_forward
- Problem 1. Alice and Bob sell used CDs at music festivals. Each is deciding whether or not to set up their booth at the last festival of the summer. The festival is scheduled to take place in Alton, very near where Alice lives. It will cost her only $30 to travel the festival. Bob is farther away, and it will cost her $100 to travel to Alton. Both Alice and Bob would prefer to be only CD sellers at the festival, since they would avoid competition. If only one seller is at the festival, she will make $150 during the day (not counting travel costs). If both Bob and Alice sell CDs at the festival, they will lower their prices and each make $50 during the day. Both Alice and Bob receive $0 for not attending the festival. 1. Draw the Normal Form of the game Alice and Bob are playing, be sure to label the game completely. 2. Does either player have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? 3. List all pure strategy Nash equilibria for this game. Remember that a Nash equilibrium is a strategy…arrow_forwardSuppose OPEC has only two producers, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria, Saudi Arabia has far more oil reserves and is the lower-cost producer compared to Nigeria. The payoff matrix in the table to the right shows the profits earned per day by each country. "Low output" corresponds to producing the OPEC assigned quota and "high output" corresponds to producing the maximum capacity beyond the assigned quota Which of the following statements is true? OA. The Nash equilibrium is a cooperative equilibrium. OB. The Nash equilibrium is a noncooperative, dominant strategy equilibrium OC. The Nash equilibrium is a collusive equilibrium. D. There is no Nash equilibrium in this game because each party. pursues its dominant strategy. Low output Nigeria High output Low output Nigeria earns $20 million Saudi Arabia Nigeria earns $30 million Saudi Arabia earns $100 million Saudi Arabia earns $80 million High output Nigeria earns $12 million Saudi Arabia earns $75 million Nigeria earns $20 million Saudi Arabia…arrow_forwardWhat would be the correct answer in this case? I was surprised that "B. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and for Kuwait to produce a high output" was incorrect.arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning