Suppose a person earns $500 a month. A social assistance program with a grant amount of $1,000 a month and a clawback of 100% would result in a social assistance payment to the person of $500, because 100% of the person's earnings are used to reduce the assistance payment from its maximum amount. True False

Suppose a person earns $500 a month. A social assistance program with a grant amount of $1,000 a month and a clawback of 100% would result in a social assistance payment to the person of $500, because 100% of the person's earnings are used to reduce the assistance payment from its maximum amount. True False

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter12: Income Distribution, Poverty, And Discrimination

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Susan is a single mother with three children. She is a cashier at a food market earning $7.75 per hour and works up to 2,000 hours per year. She is eligible for government benefits, so if she does not earn any income, she will receive a total of $17,050 per year. She can work and still receive government benefits, but for every $1 of income, her government stipend is $1 less. The government has decided to change the benefits policy of every $1 of income earned to reduce the government’s stipend by 60 cents. How will this change Susan's benefits received? What are her new choices? Complete the Revised Poverty Trap Table to present Susan’s options and provide answers to the following: What are the advantages of Susan working? What are the disadvantages of Susan working? What are the advantages of Susan receiving government benefits? What are the disadvantages of Susan receiving government benefits? Based on your findings from the Poverty Trap Table, should Susan continue to work…
Using the discussion of pay-as-you-go social security programs. explain how to derive the result that when n>r, this type of program is welfare-improving for all generations
Consider an income guarantee program with an income guarantee of $5,000 and a benefit reduction rate of 40%. A person can work up to 2,000 hours per year at $10 per hour. a. Draw the person’s budget constraint with the income guarantee. b. Suppose that the income guarantee rises to $7,500 but with a 60% reduction rate. Draw the new budget constraint c. Which of these two income guarantee programs is more likely to discourage work? Explain. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Presently, there is a minimum and maximum social security benefit paid to retirees. Between these two bounds, a retiree’s benefit level depends on how much she contributed to the system over her work life. Suppose Social Security was changed so that everyone aged 65 or older was paid $12,000 per year regardless of how much she earned over her working life or whether she continued to work after the age of 65. How would this likely affect hours worked of retirees?
One proposal for reforming the welfare system is to create a negative income tax. Under the negative income tax, each person is entitled to a grant of G dollars permonth. For every dollar the person earns, the grant is reduced by t dollars. a. Suppose G = 200 and t = 0.40. Consider an individual whose hourly wage = $10. There are 30 days in a month, so the total allotment of T = 720. Sketch the budgetconstraint before and after the introduction of the negative income tax. b. Would people work more or less with the implementation of this system? c. What if t = 100%? Explain!
How do factor endowments affect personal income? Examine different provisions employed by the government in dealing with inequality in the distribution of income.
This question concerns rent subsidies. Suppose that under a rent subsidy the government will pay some specified proportion of the total rental price. Using an indifference map for "housing" (e.g. rooms of standard quality) and "all other commodities" analyze whether this approach to enhancing domestic welfare is more or less effective than granting income tax reductions equal in dollar amount to the amount of the rent subsidy? How do these compare to a lump sum $250 per month subsidy which must be applied toward rent or it is taken away?
Assume that workers whoses are less than $8000 currently pay no federal income taxes. Suppose a new government program guarantees each worker $4000, whether or not he or she earns any income. For all earned income up to $8000, the worker must pay a 50- percent tax. Draw the budget line facing the worker under this new program. Using the line drawing tool, draw the new budget line facing a worker whose wage is such that his or her pre-tax earned income is less than $8000. Label this line 'BC2'.
An individual can earn $12 per hour if he or she works. Assume that a person can work at most 24 hours per day times 30 days per month for a total of 720 hours. Thus, the axis intercepts, in the absence of any program, are 720 × $12 = $8,640 in consumption and 720 hours of leisure.Scenario: Suppose that a new welfare program is introduced where the government guarantees $600 per month in income and reduces the benefit by $1 for each $1 of labor income. Below is the budget constraints that show the monthly income-leisure trade-off. Given his/her 30 hours of works, he/she is qualified for the welfare program. Calculate his welfare benefits (not total monthly income) after considering dollar-for-dollar reduction. $ _______________________________________
The table below is an illustration of Pareto efficiency criterion after the implementation of a state income policy in some selected Ministries . Before policy. After policy Ministry A. 400 800 Ministry B. 200 200 Ministry C . 300 300 Total. 900 1300 Analyse the welfare condition of the Ministries after the income policy.
Suppose a single parent can work up to 16 hours per day at a wage rate of $30 per hour and has no non-labour income. An income maintenance program has been developed to assure a minimum level of income for low-income families. A simplified version of this type of a program is one that would give this single parent a $120 no-work grant accompanied by a benefit reduction of a dollar for every dollar earned until no benefit is left to pay. For example, to someone who does not work the program pays $120, while for someone who works 1 hour and earns $30 the benefit is reduced by $30 to $90. Draw the daily budget constraints with and without program participation for the single individual described above on the plane that has leisure L on the horizontal axis, and money income Y (inclusive of benefits if on a program) on the vertical axis. Carefully mark all the important points of the constraints and indicate the slopes. Question: At what level of labour market earningsdoes the subsidy end?…
One of the major problems in dealing with any welfare program is the tension between individual and social responsibility- Medicare is no different. Should adult children be responsible for the medical expenses of their parents? No. Where does individual and familiar Responsibility end and social responsibility begin?