The following data were obtained from the spectrophotometric titration of Cu(II) and Ca(II) in an unknown solution. A 25.00 mL aliquot of the unknown was taken to which 50.0 mL of ethanolamine buffer and 25.0 mL of distilled water were added. The solution was then titrated with standard 0.2508 M EDTA solution. Plot the recorded data, absorbance against volume of EDTA in mL. Correct the absorbance for volume changes. Calculate the number of moles of Ca(II) and Cu(II) in the unknown sample. Vol of Titrant, mL Vol of Titrant, mL Abs Abs

The following data were obtained from the spectrophotometric titration of Cu(II) and Ca(II) in an unknown solution. A 25.00 mL aliquot of the unknown was taken to which 50.0 mL of ethanolamine buffer and 25.0 mL of distilled water were added. The solution was then titrated with standard 0.2508 M EDTA solution. Plot the recorded data, absorbance against volume of EDTA in mL. Correct the absorbance for volume changes. Calculate the number of moles of Ca(II) and Cu(II) in the unknown sample. Vol of Titrant, mL Vol of Titrant, mL Abs Abs

Fundamentals Of Analytical Chemistry

9th Edition

ISBN:9781285640686

Author:Skoog

Publisher:Skoog

Chapter31: Introduction To Analytical Separations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 31.18QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The acid-base indicator HIn undergoes the following reaction in dilute aqueous solution: HIncolor1H++Incolor2 The following absorbance data were obtained for a 5.00 I0-4 M solution of HIn in 0.1 M NaOH and 0.1 M HC1. Measurements were made at wavelengths of 485 nm and 625 nm with 1.00-cm cells. 0.1 M NaOH A485 = 0.075 A625 = 0.904 0.1 M HC1 A485 = 0.487 A625 = 0.181 In the NaOH solution, essentially all of the indicator is present as In-; in the acidic solution, it is essentially all in the form of HIn. (a) Calculate molar absorptivities for In- and HIn at 485 and 625 nm. (b) Calculate the acid dissociation constant for the indicator ¡fa pH 5.00 buffer containing a small amount of the indicator exhibits an absorbance of 0.567 at 485 nm and 0.395 at 625 nm (1.00-cm cells). (c) What is the pH of a solution containing a small amount of the indicator that exhibits an absorbance of0.492 at 485 nm and 0.245 at 635 nm (1.00-cm cells)? (d) A 25.00-mL aliquot of a solution of purified weak organic acid HX required exactly 24.20 mL of a standard solution of a strong base to reach a phenolphthalein end point. When exactly 12.10 mL of the base was added to a second 25.00-mL aliquot of the acid, which contained a small amount of the Indicator under consideration, the absorbance was found to be 0.333 at 485 nm and 0.655 at 625 nm (1.00-cmcells). Calculate the pH of the solution and Ka for the weak acid. (e) What would be the absorbance of a solution at 485 and 625 nm (1.50-cm cells) that was 2.00 10-4 M in the indicator and was buffered to a pH of 6.000?
The determination of iron in wines was carried out by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, using the standard addition method. To do this, 10 mL of wine were placed in five 50 mL volumetric flasks; then 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mL of a 10 ppm iron standard solution were added to each of them. Next, they were gauged with distilled water and the absorbance was measured, obtaining the values of 0.040, 0.062, 0.081, 0.102 and 0.125 respectively. Calculate the regression parameters and obtain the iron concentration in the wine, in µg / mL.
A 0.3045 g of CaCO3 primary standard was dissolved using concentrated HCl, evaporated to incipient dryness and quantitatively transferred to a 250 mL volumetric flask, and diluted to mark. A 10 mL of aliquot was then transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask, together with 5mL buffer and 5 drops of EBT indicator, and was used to standardize the EDTA titrant. The solution turned blue after the addition of 24.10 mL of EDTA. A blank correction was performed and was determined to be 0.4 mL. What is the concentration of EDTA obtained (MW CaCO3 = 100.0869 g/mol)?
A 0.3045 g of CaCO3 primary standard was dissolved using concentrated HCl, evaporated to incipient dryness, and quantitatively transferred to a 250 mL volumetric flask and diluted to mark. A 10 mL of aliquot was then transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask, together with 5mL buffer and 5 drops of EBT indicator, and was used to standardize the EDTA titrant. The solution turned blue after the addition of 24.10 mL of EDTA. A blank correction was made and was determined to be 0.4 mL. [Analysis] A 30 mL unknown water sample was treated with 37.6 mL of EDTA. A blank correction was made and was determined to be 0.4 mL. What is the concentration of Ca2+ (40.0780 g/mol) in ppm?
A foot powder sample containing Zn was dissolved on 50.00 mL water and was titrated to the end point color with 22.57 mL of 0.01639 M EDTA at pH=4. (α= 3.61x109, KKzny2 = 3.2 x 1016). The pZn in the sample is:
The amount of iron in a meteorite was determined by a redox titration using KMnO4 as the titrant. A 0.4185 -g sample was dissolved in acid and the liberated Fe3+ quantitatively reduced to Fe2+, using a reductor column. Titrating with 0.0044 M KMnO4 requires 28.76 mL to reach the end point. Determine the %w/w Fe2O3 in the sample of meteorite. (Fe = 55.845 amu, Fe2O3 = 159.69 g/mol
10-mL aliquots of an environmental water sample were pipetted into five 50.00-mL volumetric flasks. Exactly 0.00, 5.00, 10.00, 15.00, and 20.00-mL of a standard solution containing 11.1 ppm Fe3+ were added to each, followed by an excess of thiocyanate ion to give the red complex Fe(SCN)2+. After dilution to volume, the instrumental response for each of the five solutions measured with a colorimeter was found to be 0.240, 0.437, 0.621, 0.809, 1.809, respectively. Using Excel and the LINEST function, what was the concentration in the water sample (including error)? [HINT: consider the type of calibration scheme used.]
A 5.323 g of dried eggshell is transferred to a 250-mL beaker and dissolved in 25 mL of 6 M HCl. The mixture was filtered and transferred into a 250 mL volumetric flask and diluted to the mark. A 20.00-mL aliquot is placed in a 125-mL Erlenmeyer flask and buffered to a pH of 10. The mixture was titrated with 0.04992 M EDTA and 43.25 mL was consumed to reach the end point. Determine the amount of calcium in the eggshell as %w/w calcium carbonate.
A standard solution was put through appropriate dilutions to give the concentrations of iron shown in the table that follows. The iron(II)-1,10-phenanthroline complex was then formed in 25.0-mL aliquots of these solutions, following which each was diluted to 50.0 mL. The following absorbances (1.00-cm cells) were recorded at 510 nm: Calculate the concentration, in ppm, of a sample with an abosrbance of 0.829. Fe(II) concentration (ppm) A510 4.00 0.160 10.0 0.390 16.0 0.630 24.0 0.950 32.0 1.260 40.0 1.580
Commercial Vanadyl Sulfate (VOSO4) is contaminated with H2SO4 and H2O. A solution was prepared dissolving 0.2447 g of impure VOSO4 in 50.00 mL of water. A spectrophotometric analysis indicated that the The concentration of vanadyl ions, VO2+ (blue) was 0.0243 M. A 5.00 mL sample was passed through a column filled with a cation exchange resin in H+ form, to retain the vanadyl ion and the eluent necessary for its titration 13.03 mL of NaOH 0.02274 M. Calculate the percentage by weight of each component (VOSO4, H2SO4, and H2O) in commercial vanadyl sulfate. (Pm VOSO4, 162.96; H2SO4, 97.94)
Using the absorbance of [FeSCN]+2 at the wavelength of maximum absorption which you obtained in part B, and the diameter of the tube, obtained in part A,calculate the molar extinction coefficient. given info: Concentration of Fe3+ stock solution, C1 = 0.001 M Volume of stock Fe3+ solution pipetted, V1 = 25mL Concentration of diluted stock solution, C2 = 0.0004 M Volume of Fe2+ solution and KSCN (upon mixing) = 10mL Weight of KSCN = 1g The reaction taking place is given as: The reaction taking place is given as: F e 3+ (aq) + SC N − (aq) ⇔Fe [SCN] 2+ (aq) the concentration of [FeSCN]2+ after the mixing of Fe3+ and SCN- is 2.5 x 10-3 M. Moles of [FeSCN]2+ = 2.5 x 10-5 moles Diameter:1.2cm The wavelength at which maximum absorption takes place is = 480 nm
If the apparent molar absorptivity of cefuroxime sodium is 2.046 × 103 L mol−1 cm−1 in a 1-cm cuvette, at what concentration should the standard and sample solutions be prepared to result to an ideal absorbance value of 0.500? Show your solution.