Concept explainers
To analyze:
The results of the investigation showing the relationship between gradual and sudden environmental changes on the extinction, evolution, and adaptation of the populations.
Given:
Overuse of drugs has been associated with the significant increase in drug-resistance. In the given experiment, the researchers use a serial transfer for propagating 1,255 population of Escherichia coli in gradually increasing antibiotic (rifampicin) concentration environment.
Figure A shows the increasing rifampicin concentrations which are increased suddenly, gradually and moderately.
In the figure B the results of the experiments depicting the percentage of population surviving the antibiotic conditions are shown.
Introduction:
Extinction of the organisms is by the fact of sudden changes which occur in ecosystem. Sudden changes do not allow the organism to adapt and acclimatize to the environmental conditions. Gradual changes allow the organism to get accustomed to the changes and allow it to adapt accordingly.
Explanation of Solution
The experiment involved the exposure of antibiotic to the bacteria, by two ways one gradual other sudden. Survival population after treatment with different antibiotic concentrations at different rates differed greatly.
It is very much clear from survival population numbers in the graph that a sudden increase leads to the death because of such sudden increase in antibiotic concentration.
In the case of gradual increase the bacteria survived eventually end up becoming antibiotic resistant because of the fact that the gradual increase allowed the bacteria to save and protect itself by acquiring plasmids, point mutations, and genetic recombination.
The less time in sudden increase in antibiotics made the bacterium incapable of genetic exchange and hence the bacterial population decreased in numbers considerably.
The above experiment can explain the adaptation in case of multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) species of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as well as sudden extinction of dinosaurs.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the extinction and loss of organisms is due to sudden change in environmental factors whereas acclimatization is the result of gradual changes in the environmental conditions.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 1 Solutions
EBK LIFE: THE SCIENCE OF BIOLOGY
- (b) Suppose that we want to model the evolution of the population of a cer- tain type of organisms. Observations indicate that if the population drops below a survival level of 10° individuals, it goes extinct. Moreover, the population growth is limited: the available resources of space and food can sustain at most 106 individuals. We treat the population size P(t) as a continuous function of time. (i) Explain briefly how the following model incorporates the above ob- servations: dP — К(А- Р)(Р — В), k>0, dt where P(t) denotes the population size at time t and B 0. dt Find the equilibrium values and determine their stability. [6]arrow_forwardIn this experiment, lake sediments preserved stable samples of the parasite and host. What is one potentialdifficulty in studying antagonistic evolution in real-time or extant populations?arrow_forwardThere are hundreds of species of cichlid fish in Lake Victoria in Africa. Some scientists argue that they evolved sympatrically, but recent studies of the lake suggest that it periodically dried out, leaving a series of small ponds. Whyis this observation relevant to evaluating the hypothesis that these species arose by sympatric speciation?arrow_forward
- What makes the ecosystem of the Galapagos Island different than those found on large continentals? Upon what did Charles Darwin's original research on finches of the Galapagos Island focus? Describe the research Peter and Rosemary Grant conducted on the finches in the 1970's. Discuss the relationship between the finches' beak depth size and survival in terms of natural selection and fitness and the environmental causes that shaped the finch population of the islands.arrow_forwardA species that has a high rate of long-distance dispersal is more likely to colonize new habitat. But that species may also be less likely to adapt to local conditions, because migration will be stronger than local selection pressures for many loci. in light of those considerations, when do you expect that increasing dispersal might result in the evolution of a larger geographic range, and when might it not? Your answerarrow_forwardWhat are the most common mechanisms of sympatric speciation and in which major group of organisms does this happen most often? Distinguish between sympatric, allopatric and parapatric speciation. What is considered the (far) more common mechanism of species formation? What does "gene flow" between populations mean?arrow_forward
- Try to outline a scenario explaining the evolution of the three species shown in panel g. Use migration, mutation, genetic drift, selection, reproductive isolation, gene flow, extinction, and many generations in your scenario. Based on your scenario, what are the components that are necessary in a population in order for it to split or diverge into two new daughter species from a single ancestor (the parent species)?arrow_forwardHow does one species diverge from another? (When do we call a group a new species—and how does that process happen?) Using anole lizards or another very specific example(s), compare and contrast microevolutionary processes with speciation. As you discuss speciation, be sure to compare and contrast sympatric speciation with allopatric speciation and say whether the example you’ve chosen is allopatric or sympatric.arrow_forwardCompare and contrast the multiregional and replacement models for human origins in the table below. If you are struggling with this, see the PowerPoint on the origins and dispersal of modern humans and review the tutorial: https://www2.palomar.edu/anthro/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm Multiregional Model Replacement Main argument of this model Evidence that supports this model Based on the evidence, which model of human origins is best supported?arrow_forward
- In one of the hypotheses that explain the extinction of the dinosaurs, the rapid climatic change produced an environmental situation with which these species could not cope. How important is the total amount of variation present in the population if the selective pressures suddenly change? Why?arrow_forwardA species that has a high rate of long-distance dispersal is more likely to colonize new habitat. But that species may also be less likely to adapt to local conditions, because migration will be stronger than local selection pressures for many loci. In light of those considerations, when do you expect that increasing dispersal might result in the evolution of a larger geographic range, and when might it not?arrow_forwardHow were researchers able to determine that Soapberry bug mouthparts had evolved to be shorter in some populations? By growing a population in a laboratory and forcing them to eat smaller walled fruits for several generations By analyzing the gene variants for mouth parts in different populations By experimentally introducing new fruits into the the ecosystems that the populations they suspected were evolving live in By comparing the mouthparts of modern populations to museum specimens collected in the pastarrow_forward
- Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage Learning