MINDTAP (6 MONTH) FOR AUDITING: A RISK
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781337619493
Author: JOHNSTONE
Publisher: CENGAGE C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 1, Problem 43FF
To determine
Introduction: Fraud refers to an intended attempt to misrepresent the financial statement of an entity in order to attain some personal gain or advantage.
To explain: The Company D’s main complaints and risks associated with the accepting and retaining clients in the foreign country that is not supportive of US interest.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Section 301 of the Corporations Act requires companies to have their financial reports audited. Academic research suggests that Big-4 auditors charge higher fees than other auditors and their audit reports are more credible than those issued by other auditors.RequiredIn times of economic recession would you expect:(a) the demand for audits to increase or decrease?(b) clients to shift from large (Big-4) auditors to smaller auditors, or from smaller auditors to Big-4 auditors? Why or why not?
Section 301 of the Corporations Act requires companies to have their financial reports audited. Academic research suggests that Big-4 auditors charge higher fees than other auditors and their audit reports are more credible than those issued by other auditors.
Required:
In times of economic recession would you expect:
the demand for audits to increase or decrease?
clients to shift from large (Big-4) auditors to smaller auditors, or from smaller auditors to Big-
4 auditors? Why or why not?
Washington D.C., August 15, 2017 — The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that KPMG has agreed to pay more than $6.2 million to settle allegations that it failed to properly audit the financial statements of oil and gas companies, resulting in investors being misinformed about the value of energy companies. The KPMG engagement partner in charge of the audit also agreed to settle the claim against him. According to an SEC order, KPMG was hired as an outside auditor for Miller Energy Resources in 2011 and issued an unqualified audit report despite the grossly overstated value of major oil and gas assets. KPMG and engagement partner John Riordan failed to properly assess the risks associated with accepting Miller Energy as a client and did not perform the audit properly, which overlooked an over-assessment of certain oil and gas interests the company had purchased in Alaska the previous year. Among other audit failures, KPMG and Riordan did not adequately consider and…
Chapter 1 Solutions
MINDTAP (6 MONTH) FOR AUDITING: A RISK
Ch. 1 - Prob. 1CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 2CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 3CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 4CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 5CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 6CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 7CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 8CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 9CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 10CYBK
Ch. 1 - Prob. 11CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 12CYBKCh. 1 - Utilitarian theory holds that what is ethical is...Ch. 1 - Prob. 14CYBKCh. 1 - Which of the following statements related to...Ch. 1 - Utilitarianism does not require which of the...Ch. 1 - Prob. 17CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 18CYBKCh. 1 - Prob. 19CYBKCh. 1 - Which of the following factors is not an example...Ch. 1 - Prob. 1RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 2RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 3RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 4RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 5RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 6RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 7RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 8RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 9RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 10RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 11RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 12RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 13RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 14RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 15RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 16RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 17RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 18RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 19RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 20RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 21RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 22RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 23RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 24RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 25RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 26RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 27RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 28RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 29RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 30RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 31RQSCCh. 1 - Refer to the Why It Matters feature “What Is...Ch. 1 - Prob. 33RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 34RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 35RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 36RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 37RQSCCh. 1 - As the auditor for XYZ Company, you discover that...Ch. 1 - Prob. 39RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 40RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 41RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 42RQSCCh. 1 - Prob. 43FFCh. 1 - Prob. 44FFCh. 1 - Prob. 45FFCh. 1 - Prob. 46FF
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Below are several statements about the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX).1. SOX represents legislation passed in response to several accounting scandals in the early 2000s.2. The requirements outlined in SOX apply only to those companies expected to have weak internal controls or to have manipulated financial statements in the past.3. Section 404 of SOX requires both company management and auditors to document and assess the effectiveness of a company’s internal control processes that could affect financial reporting.4. Severe financial penalties and the possibility of imprisonment are consequences of fraudulent misstatement.5. With the establishment of SOX, management now has primary responsibility for hiring an external audit firm.6. The lead auditor in charge of auditing a particular company must rotate off that company only when occupational fraud is suspected.Required:State whether the answer to each of the statements is true or false.arrow_forwardoshiba - a case of internal audit failure The 140-year-old pillar of Japan Inc is caught up in the country's biggest accounting scandal since 2011 Asish K Bhattacharyya Toshiba, a 140-year-old pillar of Japan Inc, is caught up in the country's biggest accounting scandal since 2011. In 2011, Olympus Corp was embroiled in a scandal. In July 2015, Toshiba Corp president Hisao Tanaka and his two predecessors quit after investigators found that the company inflated earnings by at least $1.2 billion during the period 2009-2014. Toshiba is one of the early adopters of the corporate governance reforms initiated in Japan. The corporate governance structure met corporate governance standards. Time and again cases of corporate governance failures have provided evidence that good corporate governance structure does not necessarily lead to good corporate governance. Organisation culture is a critical determinant of the quality of corporate governance. Some of the observations of the independent…arrow_forwardJ, B & J, Certified Public Accountants, has audited the Highcredit Corporation for the past five years. Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has commenced an investigation of Highcredit for possible violations of Federal securities law. The SEC has subpoenaed all of J, B & J’s working papers pertinent to the audit of Highcredit. Highcredit insists that J, B & J not turn over the documents to the SEC. What action should J, B & J take? Why?arrow_forward
- 3. Identify the factors that may have contributed to the alleged flaws in the audit procedures that PwC applied in testing the year-end market values of the Lipper hedge funds’ investments. Discuss specific measures that audit firms can employ to reduce the likelihood that such factors will undercut the quality of their audits.arrow_forward5-92. General Motors FRAUD In March 2006, General Motors (GM) announced that it needed to restate its previous year’s financial statements. Excerpts from the Wall Street Journal describing the restatements include the following: GM, which already faces an SEC probe into its accounting practices, also disclosed that its 10-K report, when filed, will outline a series of accounting mistakes that will force the car maker to restate its earnings from 2000 to the first quarter of 2005. GM also said it was widening by $2 billion the loss it reported for 2005. Many of the other GM problems relate to rebates, or credits, from suppliers. Typically, suppliers offer an upfront payment in exchange for a promise by the customer to buy certain quantities of products over time. Under accounting rules, such rebates cannot be recorded until after the promised purchases are made. GM said it concluded it had mistakenly recorded some of these payments prematurely. The biggest impact was in 2001, when the…arrow_forwardRead the facts of the case in Problem 2-26 to become familiar withthe fraud involving Koss Corporation. From the company’s October 7,2009, proxy statement (Def 14A filing with the SEC), we know the followingfacts about the company’s audit committee and its members:Thomas L. Doerr 65, has been a director of the company since 1987. In1972, Mr. Doerr co-founded Leeson Electric Corporation and served asits president and CEO until 1982. The company manufactures industrialelectric motors. In 1983, Mr. Doerr incorporated Doerr Corporation asa holding company for the purpose of acquiring established companiesinvolved in distributing products to industrial and commercial markets.Currently, Mr. Doerr serves as president of Doerr Corporation.Mr. Doerr owns no stock in Koss Corporation and received $24,000 incash compensation during 2009 to serve on the audit committee.Lawrence S. Mattson 77, has been a director of the company since 1978.Mr. Mattson is the retired president of Oster company, a…arrow_forward
- From the article below, 1) What caused the SEC to question EY's independence? 2). Explain the findings in the history for EY's other instances where its independence was called into question. Accounting reform occurred after significant corporate misconduct was discovered in the early 1980s. Some of the reform sought to require public companies to put the hiring and pay of their auditors in the hands of an independent audit board committee. There has been concern that management still has significant influence on the evaluation and final decisions. Phillip Lamoreaux, an accounting professor at Arizona State University, conducted a study of more than 2,000 auditor changes in publicly traded companies. He found that companies whose top executives had worked with a Big Four accounting firm were twice as likely to select that firm. Many executives make their way into corporate America through the largest accounting firms in the world. A chief accountant in the Securities and Exchange…arrow_forwardNixon & Co., CPAs, issued an unmodified opinion on the 2015 financial statements of Madison Corp. These financial statements were included in Madison’s annual report and Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Nixon did not detect material misstatements in the financial statements as a result of negligence in the performance of the audit. Based upon the financial statements, Harry Corp. purchased stock in Madison. Shortly thereafter, Madison became insolvent, causing the price of the stock to decline drastically. Harry has commenced legal action against Nixon for damages based upon Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. What would be Nixon’s best defense to such an action? Explain.arrow_forwardWhich of the following is not part of Sarbanes–Oxley?a. An increased duty on the part of auditors to identify financial statement fraud.b. A requirement that the CEO and CFO certify the financial statements.c. Increased penalties for destruction of records in federal investigations.d. Increased penalties for mail fraud and criminal violations of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934arrow_forward
- (1) Audit Reports: (A) What types of companies are required to obtain an independent audit and what is the purpose of the Audit Report? (B) An “unqualified opinion” doesn’t sound very favorable; in fact, it sounds like the person giving the opinion does not have the proper credentials. Please clarify this issue. Wouldn’t a company rather receive a “qualified opinion?” Also, does a clean opinion mean the financial statements are 100% error-free? Please explain.arrow_forwardQ6. Many small companies elect to have their financial statements reviewed by a CPA firm, rather than incur the cost of an audit. True or Falsearrow_forwardIn January 2008, it was discovered that William Borchard, who handled due diligence for clients of PwC interested in mergers and acquisitions, divulged controversial plans to Gregory Raben, an auditor at the firm, and Raben used the information to buy stock ahead of a series of corporate takeovers. The SEC found the two guilty of insider trading, a violation of the law. Assume none of the clients were audit clients. What are the ethical issues involved in engaging in such transactions? Were any of the AICPA rules of conduct violated? Explain.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning