MANAGERIAL/ECON+BUS/STR CONNECT ACCESS
9th Edition
ISBN: 2810022149537
Author: Baye
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 11PAA
To determine
The clear-cut price strategy of the given game.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
While there is a degree of differentiation between major grocery chains like Albertsons and Kroger, the regular offering of sale prices by both firms for many of their products provides evidence that these firms engage in price competition. For markets where Albertsons and Kroger are the dominant grocers, this suggests that these two stores simultaneously announce one of two prices for a given product: a regular price or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other announces the regular price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts 1,000 extra customers to earn a profit of $5,000, compared to the $3,000 earned by the firm announcing the regular price. When both firms announce the sale price, the two firms split the market equally (each getting an extra 500 customers) to earn profits of $2,000 each. When both firms announce the regular price, each company attracts only its 1,500 loyal customers and the firms each earn…
While there is a degree of differentiation between major grocery chains like Albertsons and Kroger, the regular offering of sale prices by both firms for many of their products provides evidence that these firms engage in price competition. For markets where Albertsons and Kroger are the dominant grocers, this suggests that these two stores simultaneously announce one of two prices for a given product: a regular price or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other announces the regular price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts 1,000 extra customers to earn a profit of $5,000, compared to the $3,000 earned by the firm announcing the regular price. When both firms announce the sale price, the two firms split the market equally (each getting an extra 500 customers) to earn profits of $2,000 each. When both firms announce the regular price, each company attracts only its 1,500 loyal customers and the firms each earn…
While there is a degree of differentiation between major grocery chains like Albertsons and Kroger, the regular offering of sale prices
by both firms for many of their products provides evidence that these firms engage in price competition. For markets where Albertsons
and Kroger are the dominant grocers, this suggests that these two stores simultaneously announce one of two prices for a given
product: a regular price or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other announces the regular
price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts 1,000 extra customers to earn a profit of $5,000, compared to
the $3,000 earned by the firm announcing the regular price. When both firms announce the sale price, the two firms split the market
equally (each getting an extra 500 customers) to earn profits of $2,000 each. When both firms announce the regular price, each
company attracts only its 1,500 loyal customers and the firms each earn…
Chapter 10 Solutions
MANAGERIAL/ECON+BUS/STR CONNECT ACCESS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and Cargill are the biggest makers of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), used to sweeten Coke, Pepsi, and other non-diet soft drinks. Each firm is currently choosing between increasing or decreasing their price for HFCS. The table below gives each firm's profits in each possible situation. A is Archer Daniels Midland and C is Cargill. For purposes of this question, ignore the existence of other HFCS makers. Cargill P increase P decrease P increase A: $500 million A: $200 million C: $400 million C: $500 million ADM P decrease A: $600 million A: $350 million C: $200 million C: $300 million a. Assuming the two firms do not cooperate, does either have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? b. If ADM and Cargill decide to cooperate, how, if at all, will the outcome differ from part a? Would this case be an evample of a repeated or a pon-reneated game?arrow_forwardWhile there is a degree of differentiation between major grocery chains like Albertsons and Kroger, the regular offering of sale prices by both firms for many of their products provides evidence that these firms engage in price competition. For markets where Albertsons and Kroger are the dominant grocers, this suggests that these two stores similtaneously announce one of two prices for a given product: a regular price or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other annoucements the regular price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts 1,000 extra customers to earn a profit of $5,000, compared to the $3,000 earned by the firm announcing the regular price. When both firms announce the sale price, the two firms split the market equally (each getting an extrs 500 customers) to earn profits of $2,000 each. When both firms announce the regular price, each company attracts only its 1,500 loyal customers and the firms each earn…arrow_forwardThe opioid epidemic causing a staggering number of deaths each year in the United States is largely caused by two drugs: heroin and fentanyl. Much of the heroin is supplied by several major organized Mexican cartels while the much stronger fentanyl is mostly produced in hundreds of labs (big and small) in China. The market structure for heroin can be considered as an oligopoly that operates as a monopoly. On the other hand, the fentanyl industry is less organized in terms of cartel organization and therefore more competitive. How do the differences in the organization of both industries explain why deaths from fentanyl have skyrocketed in recent years? The organized heroin cartel A.does not have barriers to market entry. The more competitive fentanyl industry has substantial barriers to entry, making fentanyl a more available drug. B.has the ability to control quantity and raise the prices. The more competitive fentanyl industry makes more of the drug available at a lower…arrow_forward
- GoJex and Grav are both considering whether to charge a low price or a high price to their customers. If both firms charge a low price, each firm will make a profit of $5 million. If GoJex charges a low price while Grav charges a high price, GoJex will make a profit of $25 million and Grav will only make a profit of $2 million. On the other hand, if GoJex do not charges a low price while Grav does, GoJex will make a profit of $2 million while Grav will make a profit of $25 million. Finally, if both firms charge a high price, each firm will make a profit of $15 million. a. Use the information above to construct a payoff matrix for GoJex and Grav and What is the dominant strategy for each firm? Explain. b. Based on your answer (point b) above, what is the Nash equilibrium for this game? Explain. c. What is the cooperative (collusion) outcome? Explainarrow_forwardAt a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg's was quoted as saying, “. for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow's hide." Kellogg's has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg's and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $0 billion in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $10 billion. If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $52 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $2 billion. For what range of interest rates could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising? Instruction: Enter your response as a percentage rounded to the nearest whole number. percentarrow_forwardIn the late 1990s, Vanguard Airlines operated as a low-cost carrier, offering low prices and limited services, out of Kansas City, Missouri. Not long after its inception, Vanguard began offering a significant number of flights based out of Midway International Airport in Chicago, Illinois, as well. When Vanguard expanded to Midway, incumbent airlines, such as Delta, quickly responded to its low fares by offering many competing flights at comparably low prices. The intense price competition ultimately caused Vanguard to exit Midway in 2000 and file for bankruptcy in 2002. At varying points in time, the airline industry has been described as a contestable market; does the example of Vanguard support or refute this characterization of the airline industry? Explainarrow_forward
- At a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $0 billion in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $8 billion.If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $43 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. For what range of interest rates could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?Instruction: Enter your response as a percentage rounded to the nearest whole number.i ≤ percentarrow_forwardAt a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $0 in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $12 billion. If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $52 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. Under what conditions could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?arrow_forwardAt a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $2 billion in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $16 billion.If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $56 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. For what range of interest rates could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?Instruction: Enter your response as a percentage rounded to the nearest whole number.arrow_forward
- Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies split the market and earn $60 million each. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower by $20 million since each company must bear the cost of advertising. Yet, if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. In this case, the company that advertises earns $70 million while the company that does not advertise earns only $30 million. What will these two companies do if they behave as individual profit maximizers? One company will advertise, and the other will not. Brown Inc. earns $70. Both companies will advertise. PM Inc. earns $60. Neither company will advertise. Brown Inc. earns $60. Both companies will advertise. Brown Inc. earns $40.arrow_forwardSuppose Giocattolo of Italy and American Toy Company of the United States are the only two firms producing toys for sale in the U.S. market. Each firm realizes constant long-term costs so that the average total cost (ATC) equals the marginal cost (MC) at each level of output. Thus, MCo = ATCO is the long-term market supply schedule for toys. Suppose Giocattolo and American Toy Company operate as competitors, and the cost schedules of each company are MCo = ATCO = $10. On the following graph, use the grey point (star symbol) to identify the competitive market equilibrium. Then, use the green triangle (triangle symbols) to identify consumer surplus in this case. Note: Select and drag the point from the palette to the graph. Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. Then select and drag the shaded region from the palette to the graph. To resize the shaded region, select one of the points and move to the desired position. ? PRICE (Dollars per toy) 20 18 16 14 10 00 6 4 2 0…arrow_forwardTwo competing firms produce homogenous products. They also have the iden- tical total cost function: if a firm i produces quantity q, then its total cost is C, (4.) = 2q«- If the two firms compete in quantities (Cournot model of duopoly), then the market demand is P (g1, 2) = 60 – q1 - 2. If the two firms compete in prices (Bertrand model of duopoly) and firm i chooses price then the demand for firm i is P.. 60-P if p, is lower than the competitor's price if p, is higher than the competitor's price if p, is equal to the competitor's price Now consider two scenarios: A. The two firms are two law firms. One unit of product = one hour of labour. B. The two firms are two avocado farms. One unit of product = one ton of avocados. For each of these two scenarios, answer the following questions: (a) Should we use the Cournot model or the Bertrand model to study the firms' compe- tition? (b) Use your model of choice to predict each firm's profit level in equilibrium. (c) If the two firms…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
