MANAGERIAL/ECON+BUS/STR CONNECT ACCESS
9th Edition
ISBN: 2810022149537
Author: Baye
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 12PAA
To determine
If it will be better to make side-impact airbags standard equipment for the company H or not.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new breed of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side-impact airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1,000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $0.5 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $1.5 billion. If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $2 billion and the other company will earn $-1 billion.If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment?multiple choice 1
There is not enough information to answer the question.
No
Yes
If Toyota and Honda were able to cooperate, would you expect this same outcome?multiple choice 2
Yes
No
There is not enough information to answer the question.
Suppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new breed of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side-impact airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1,000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $2.5 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $1 billion (due to lost sales to other automakers). If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $3 billion and the other company will lose $1.5 billion. If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment? Explain.
Suppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new kind of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side impact-airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $2.5 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $1 billion (due to lost sales to other automakers). If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $3 billion and the other company will lose $1.5 billion. If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment?
Chapter 10 Solutions
MANAGERIAL/ECON+BUS/STR CONNECT ACCESS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Airbus and Boeing are the two largest producers of commercial aircraft in the world. They are each trying to determine whether or not they should build an ultra-large passenger plane. They have both decided that building such a plane would be profitable, but only if one of them produces it. The market is simply not large enough for them to both make profits selling this new plane. Consequently, if they both produce the plane, each will lose $10 billion. If only one of them produces, that firm will make $50 billion. Regardless of what the other does, if they choose not to produce the plane, they neither make nor lose money. a. Construct the normal or strategic form of this game and find the pure strategy NE. b. Airbus is a corporation in the European Community while Boeing is an American corporation. The EC has a long history of subsidizing Airbus as well as other man- ufacturers it deems important. Let us remodel this game assuming that the EC tells Airbus that if Airbus produces the…arrow_forwardSuppose that two companies – AlphaTech and BetaLabs – are competing for market share and must simultaneously decide whether to develop a new product. Both companies are reluctant to make a decision as it is only economical for one company to develop a new product. Each company earns nothing if they decide not to develop a new product. One company can earn $50 million by developing a new product only if their competitor does not. If both companies decide to develop a new product, they each lose $10 million. Complete the payoff matrix to represent this game. Based on your solution in part (a), determine the maximin solution.arrow_forwardConsider a two-player game between Child's Play and Kid's Corner, each of which produces and sells swing sets for children. Each player can set either a high or a low price for a standard two-swing, one-slide set. If they both set a high price, each receives profits of $64,000 per year. If one sets a low price and the other sets a high price, the low-price firm earns profits of $72,000 per year, while the high-price firm earns $20,000. If they both set a low price, each receives profits of $57,000. Assume also that the annual discount rate is r = 25%, or 8 = 0.8. The price-setting game in each year could be represented in the following normal form: CP (row)/ KC (column) High Price Low Price Game between CP and KC High Price 64, 64 72, 20 Low Price 20, 72 57, 57 a) What is the stage equilibrium of the prisoners' dilemma between CP and KC? i.(L,H) ii. (H,L) iii. (L,L) iiii. (H,H) b) What is the cooperative strategy profile? i.(L,H) ii. (H,L) iii. (L,L) iiii. (H,H) c) Suppose we repeated…arrow_forward
- q19 If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn $4 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn $10 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn $1 million and the non-advertising firm will earn $5 million. If you and your rival plan to be in business for 10 years, then the Nash equilibrium is a. for each firm to not advertise in any year. b. for neither firm to advertise in early years but to advertise in later years. c. for each firm to advertise every year. d. for each firm to advertise in early years but not advertise in later years.arrow_forwardSuppose Telkomsel and Indosat are the only two firms in the internet market. They face the following payoff when the want to invest in the research budget: When both companies invest in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 40 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 50 billion. When both of them invest in large budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 20 billion and Indosat will gain Rp 30 billion. When Telkomsel invest in large budget and Indosat in small budget, Telkomsel will gain Rp 30 billion and Indosat will gain zero. When Telkomsel invest in small budget and Indosat in large budget, Telkomsel will gain zero and Indosat will gain Rp 70 billion. a). Draw the payoff matrix b). Is there a Nash Equilibrium for that case? Explain.arrow_forwardSuppose Ishmael and Santiago are the only two fishermen who fish in Lake Hardin. Each must choose between fishing for 20 hours per week or for 40 hours per week. If both choose to fish for 20 hours per week, then each can earn a profit of $3,000 per week. If both choose to fish for 40 hours per week, then each can earn a profit of $2,000 per week. If Santiago fishes for 40 hours per week, and Ishmael fishes for 20 hours per week, then Santiago can earn a profit of $4,000 per week, and Ishmael can earn a profit of $1,000 per week. If Ishmael fishes for 40 hours per week, and Santiago fishes for 20 hours per week, then Ishmael can earn a profit of $4,000 per week, and Santiago can earn a profit of $1,000 per week. a. Construct the weekly payoff matrix for this situation. Ishmael 20 Hours 40 Hours Santiago 20 Hours $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael 40 Hours $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael $ for Santiago$ for Ishmael b. What is the equilibrium outcome…arrow_forward
- Suppose that two clothing manufacturers, Lands’ End and L.L. Bean, are deciding what price to charge for very similar field coats. The cost of producing these coats is $100. The coats are very close substitutes, so customers flock to the seller that offers the lowest price. If both firms offer identical prices, each receives half the customers. For simplicity, assume that the two firms have the choice of pricing at prices of $103, $102, or $101. The profit each firm would earn at various prices (Lands’ Ends Profit, LL Bean’s Profit) is attached in the payoff matrix below: a.) What is the Nash equilibrium and expected profits to LL Bean and Lands’ End of this game? b.) Suppose this is a mixed strategy game in which LL Bean has a 25% percent chance of choosing a priceof $101, a 25% chance of choosing price of $102, and a 50% chance of choosing $103, while Lands End has a1/3 chance of choosing each strategy. What’s the expected payoff to LL Bean? c.) Suppose that in hopes of raising…arrow_forwardAt a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $0 billion in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $8 billion.If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $43 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. For what range of interest rates could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?Instruction: Enter your response as a percentage rounded to the nearest whole number.i ≤ percentarrow_forwardAt a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $0 in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $12 billion. If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $52 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. Under what conditions could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?arrow_forward
- Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies split the market and earn $60 million each. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower by $20 million since each company must bear the cost of advertising. Yet, if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. In this case, the company that advertises earns $70 million while the company that does not advertise earns only $30 million. What will these two companies do if they behave as individual profit maximizers? One company will advertise, and the other will not. Brown Inc. earns $70. Both companies will advertise. PM Inc. earns $60. Neither company will advertise. Brown Inc. earns $60. Both companies will advertise. Brown Inc. earns $40.arrow_forwardTwo airlines, Dragon Airline and Phoenix Airline, provide direct flight service to a city and tend to compete for the same group of travellers. They are contemplating changing their airfares to earn more profit. If both airlines raise their airfares, Dragon Airline will earn $800m while Phoenix Airline will earn $400m in profit. If both airlines reduce their airfares, Dragon Airline will earn $650m while Phoenix Airline will earn $550m in profit. If Dragon Airline raises its airfare while Phoenix Airline reduces its airfare, Dragon Airline will earn $200m while Phoenix Airline will earn $350m in profit. If Dragon Airline reduces its airfare while Phoenix Airline raises its airfare, Dragon Airline will earn $300m while Phoenix Airline will earn $250m in profit. Construct the payoff matrix in terms of profit for the two pricing strategies. Apply a game theory concept and solve this game using the Nash equilibrium method. Explain how you derive your answers and also whether this game is a…arrow_forwardAt a time when demand for ready-to-eat cereal was stagnant, a spokesperson for the cereal maker Kellogg’s was quoted as saying, “ . . . for the past several years, our individual company growth has come out of the other fellow’s hide.” Kellogg’s has been producing cereal since 1906 and continues to implement strategies that make it a leader in the cereal industry. Suppose that when Kellogg’s and its largest rival advertise, each company earns $2 billion in profits. When neither company advertises, each company earns profits of $16 billion.If one company advertises and the other does not, the company that advertises earns $56 billion and the company that does not advertise loses $4 billion. For what range of interest rates could these firms use trigger strategies to support the collusive level of advertising?Instruction: Enter your response as a percentage rounded to the nearest whole number.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning