State the research design used. Interpret the results for the design.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 25CAP

To determine

State the research design used.

Interpret the results for the design.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Prior to assessment of the outcome, the researchers did a manipulation check. Members of Groups 1 and 2 rated the attractiveness (on a 1 to 9 scale, with 9 being the most attractive) of the person in the photo. They reported that for the attractive photo, M = 7.53; for the unattractive photo, M = 3.20, F(1, 108) = 184.29. Was this difference statistically significant (using a =.05)? What was the effect size for the difference in (2a)? Was their attempt to manipulate perceived attractiveness successful? Why does the F ratio in (2a) have just df=1 in the numerator?

It is commonly thought that SUVs and vans are safer than cars. If an SUV and a car are in a collision, does the SUV sustain less damage and thus need a cheaper repair? We performed 7 sample crashes of SUVs at 10mph into the rear ends of stopped cars. See the table of normal data below. SUV into car SUV damage ($) Car damage ($) CRV into Civic 1721 1274 Rav4 into corolla 1434 2327 Tucson into Forte 850 3223 Tiguan into Golf 2329 2058 Patriot into Caliber 1415 3095 Escape into Focus 1470 3386 Rogue into Sentra 2884 4560 Would you be able to say that SUVs are safer since they need less repairs? Should I use: confidence intervals z-score A cause/correlation/regression or Chi-Squared hypothesis tests

A simple random sample of heights of 6400Englishmen has a mean of 67.85 inches and SD 2.56 inches, while a simple random sample of heights of 1600 Australians has a mean of 68.55 inches and SD of 2.52 inches. D the data indicate that Australians are, on the average, taller than Englishmen?