The person S was a finance director at company T. He has frequently complained to the General Manager C of one of the managers IM for his behavior and attitude. The General Manager could not fire the person IM as he brought a lot of business to the company. One day, while IM was dropping a cash envelope into a safe, it got stuck. The person S stole it. General Manager asked the responsible party to return the envelope within twenty hours to avoid criminal charges. The person S returned the envelope after the due hours. He was charged with embezzlement. To Find: The reasons for conviction on grounds of embezzlement instead of larceny.

Question

Laud Humphrey 1970. Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. (Chicago: Aldine). In his book, Tearoom Trade (1970), Humphrey studied homosexual behavior by observing casual same-sex acts by male strangers who met at public restrooms in a park, referred to as “tearooms” by participants. He pretended to be a homosexual and acted as the lookout, known as the “watch queen,” whenever possible—a perfect opportunity to observed. To find out more about the participants, he secretly took down their license plate numbers when possible and used the police register to obtain their names and addresses. In disguise, he went to these men’s homes under the pretense that he was conducting a health survey, to gather more information about them. You are required to: Discuss the ethical issues involved in this study? Could the research have been done any other way that you deem to be ethical?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 2CT

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The person S was a finance director at company T. He has frequently complained to the General Manager C of one of the managers IM for his behavior and attitude. The General Manager could not fire the person IM as he brought a lot of business to the company. One day, while IM was dropping a cash envelope into a safe, it got stuck. The person S stole it. General Manager asked the responsible party to return the envelope within twenty hours to avoid criminal charges. The person S returned the envelope after the due hours. He was charged with embezzlement.

To Find:The reasons for conviction on grounds of embezzlement instead of larceny.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The person S was a finance director at company T. He has frequently complained to the General Manager C of one of the managers IM for his behavior and attitude. The General Manager could not fire the person IM as he brought a lot of business to the company. One day, while IM was dropping a cash envelope into a safe, it got stuck. The person S stole it. General Manager asked the responsible party to return the envelope within twenty hours to avoid criminal charges. The person S returned the envelope after the due hours. He was charged with embezzlement.

To Find:The difference between embezzlement and larceny.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Laud Humphrey 1970. Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. (Chicago: Aldine). In his book, Tearoom Trade (1970), Humphrey studied homosexual behavior by observing casual same-sex acts by male strangers who met at public restrooms in a park, referred to as “tearooms” by participants. He pretended to be a homosexual and acted as the lookout, known as the “watch queen,” whenever possible—a perfect opportunity to observed. To find out more about the participants, he secretly took down their license plate numbers when possible and used the police register to obtain their names and addresses. In disguise, he went to these men’s homes under the pretense that he was conducting a health survey, to gather more information about them. You are required to: Discuss the ethical issues involved in this study? Could the research have been done any other way that you deem to be ethical?

19-2. Duty of Loyalty. Peter hires Alice as an agent to sell a piece of property he owns. The price is to be at least $30,000. Alice discovers that the fair market value of Peter's property is actually at least $45,000 and could be higher because a shopping mall is going to be built nearby. Alice forms a real estate partnership with her cousin Carl. Then she prepares for Peter's signature a contract for the sale of the property to Carl for $32,000. Peter signs the contract. Just before closing and passage of tittle, Peter learns about the shopping mall and the increased fair market value of his property. Peter refuses to deed the property to Carl. Carl claims that Alice, as Peter's Agent, solicited a price above that agreed on when the agency was created and that the contract is therefore enforceable. Discuss fully whether Peter is bound to this contract. (See Duties, Right, and Remedies of Agents and Principals.)

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?