Subpart (a):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
In this given scenario, fisherman is the only variable factor. When other things remain the same increasing the number of fisherman leads to reduce the productivity which is known as diminishing marginal productivity.
In the fish firm, all the factors can be varied according to the requirement. Thus, marginal productivity is constant for the fisherman in the firm.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (b):
Number of fishing person.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Minimum number of fish should catch is 2 per day. The number of fisherman fishing in the lake can be calculated as follows.
Thus, the number of fisherman catching fish in the lake is 4. Remaining one fisherman is working in the firm. Total number of fish catching is 10 units
Subpart (c):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
Total number of fish can be calculated as follows.
Substitute the respective values in equation (1) to calculate the total number of fish at 1 unit of fisher man.
Total fish is 5 units.
Marginal productivity can be calculated as follows.
Substitute the respective values in equation (2) to calculate the marginal productivity of fish at 2 unit of fisher man.
Total fish is 5 units.
Table -1 shows the marginal productivity of fisher in the lake that obtained by using equation (1).
Table -1
Total fisherman (a) |
Catching fish per person
| Total fish | Marginal productivity |
1 | 5 | 5 | - |
2 | 4 | 8 | 3 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
4 | 2 | 8 | –1 |
5 | 1 | 5 | –3 |
Profit maximizing output is occurred at the point where the marginal revenue is equal to or greater than the marginal cost. Since marginal productivity is closer to 2 at the number of fisherman is 2, two fishers should be catch the fish in lake. Remaining 3 fishermen should work in the farm. And remaining 3 people should produce fish the farm. Total production of fish can be calculated as follows.
Thus, total number of fish is 14.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (d):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
The value of tax should be equal to the marginal productivity of the fisherman. The marginal productivity of fishermen is 2 (Fisherman produces fish in the farm). Thus, the tax should be equal to $2. The marginal productivity for fisher man who working in the lake is equal to or greater than the tax amount $2. Thus, two fisher man catching fish in lake and rest of the fisherman produces fish in the farm.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (e):
Number of fish per person
Subpart (e):
Explanation of Solution
Number of fish per person as per the policy can be calculated as follows.
Thus, one fisherman gets 2.8 units of fish.
The person work in the farm produces only 32 units of fish and now receives additional 0.8 units of fish. On the other hand, the fisherman who works in the lake catches 4 per person. Now they are losing 1.2 units of fish. The policy makers opinion is that if there is no restriction, then fisherman in the lake would catch only 2 units of fish per fisherman.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Study Guide for Mankiw's Essentials of Economics, 7th
- There are two people: Brandon, who is really, really good at cleaning front yards and mowing lawns; and Jim, who doesn’t have front yards or lawns in his current time and is worse than Brandon at both. In the course of a weekend, Brandon can clean ten front yards or mow five lawns. Jim, on the other hand, can clean only one front yard or mow only two lawns. Calculate the opportunity cost.arrow_forwardSuppose one person had all the resources in an economy. This is a Pareto efficient outcome. True Falsearrow_forwardAfter Hurricane Maria, hundreds of nonprofit organizations streamed to Puerto Rico and other Caribbean islands to provide disaster relief. Research has found that coordination between nonprofits during disasters is difficult to maintain—it’s easy for individual nonprofits to fundraise and pursue programming on their own while ignoring other organizations working on the same issues. Additionally, there are incentives to do projects that are cheap and have fast turnaround, since donors respond to the visibility of organizations providing disaster relief. Consider two nonprofit organizations working in Puerto Rico. Together, they could spend time coordinating their efforts and run a shelter for hurricane victims, providing each organization with 100 utils. Alternatively, they could individually distribute paper towels—a simple, low-cost, fast, and visible project—and receive 5 utils. This situation can be modeled with the following payoff matrix: Nonprofit 2 Run Shelter…arrow_forward
- Alec and Ellie are the only detectives in the town of Broadchurch. They work together. Assume efficient production. Each has 10 hours in a day to allocate between conducting interviews and completing paperwork. Alec takes 25 hours to complete one interview or 4 hours to complete one file of paperwork. Ellie takes 15 hours to complete one interview or 20 hours to complete one file of paperwork. What is Alec's Opportunity Cost of an interview in terms of files of paperwork? Enter a number only. Note: The question here is asking you for the opp. cost in terms of files so you can just enter a number. On the assessments if the question is phrased as "what is the opportunity cost?", you will have to enter the units as well, without which you will not get full credit.arrow_forwardAlice and Bob each produce haircuts and landscaping services. Alice can provide 4 haircuts in one hour. Bob can provide 2 haircuts in one hour. It takes Alice 2 hours to landscape an acre of property. It takes Bob 1 hour to landscape an acre of property. Assume Alice and Bob both work a standard 8 hour day. If Alice and Bob were to combine forces and open their business "Heads and Hedges" together, how should Alice and Bob allocate their time to maximize the gains from trade with one another? (check all that apply) Alice should only spend her time cutting hair. Bob should only spend his time cutting hair. Bob should only spend his time landscaping. Alice should only spend her time landscaping.arrow_forwardTrue/False # According to economists, people will do a particular activity only if the benefits are greater than the costsarrow_forward
- Suppose that 10 people live on a street and that each of them receives $2 in marginal benefit for each streetlight on their street, regardless of the number of streetlights provided. If the marginal cost of a street light is 2x, where x is the quantity of streetlights, what is the Pareto efficient number of streetlights to provide?arrow_forwardIn a market economy Group of answer choices All the other answers are true for the market economy. consumers buy what makes them better off. those goods and services that people will buy, will be produced. producers and sellers produce/sell goods and services that are profitable to produce/sell.arrow_forwardFive people get together for five nights at the beach. Dinner duty is distributed so that each person is assigned a night to buy and cook dinner and provide the wine. At the end of their stay, the receipts from the five nights will be summed up and each person will pay 1/5th of the total. These five people are all gourmands and each is trying to impress the other. Suppose that five different amounts can be spent on preparing a meal: 50, 80, 150, 250, and 400. As reported in the table below associated with each amount of expense is the benefit received by the person who made the meal and the benefit received by all of those who ate it (which includes the person who made it). For example, if 250 was spent on the meal, then the person who made it receives a total benefit of 280 (230 from cooking it and 50 from eating it) and each of the other four peoplereceive a benefit of 50 from eating it. A player’s payoff equals the benefitfrom making his or her meal plus the benefit from eating the…arrow_forward
- There are both costs and benefits of studying. If you continue to study (say, for a test ) as long as the marginal benefits of studying are greater than the marginal costs and stop studying when the two are equal, will your action be consistent with having maximized the net benefits of studying? Explain your answerarrow_forwardFlora and fana are examples of resources. True or falsearrow_forwardA medical researcher is trying to cure a disease. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she generates a utility benefit of 10 for each member of society. There are 1,000 people in society besides the medical researcher. The medical researcher doesn’t care about other people. She is in it for the glory. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she gets a utility benefit of 1000 (which is inclusive of the 10 that she gets for being a member of society, plus a payoff of 990 in glory). If she exerts effort e, she also suffers cost e^2. (a) The medical researcher’s payoff from exerting effort e is 1000e − e^2. What level of effort, e∗, will she exert? (b) Suppose a policymaker who was a committed utilitarian (including caring about the medical researcher’s glory, since the medical researcher cares about it) was to choose the level of effort the medical researcher exerts. That policymaker would add up the total utility in society (including the medical researcher’s utility)…arrow_forward
- Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning