Engineering Economy
16th Edition
ISBN: 9780133582819
Author: Sullivan
Publisher: DGTL BNCOM
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 18P
To determine
Calculate the probability.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Hudson Corporation is considering three options for managing its data warehouse: continuing with its own staff, hiring
an outside vendor to do the managing, or using a combination of its own staff and an outside vendor. The cost of the
operation depends on future demand. The annual cost of each option (in thousands of dollars) depends on demand as
follows:
a. If the demand probabilities are 0.2, 0.5, and 0.3, which decision alternative will minimize the expected cost of
the data warehouse? What is the expected annual cost associated with that recommendation?
b. Construct a risk profile for the optimal decision in part (a). What is the probability of the cost exceeding
$700,000?
Fisher Publishing Inc. is doing a financial feasibility analysis for a new book. Editing and preproduction costs are estimated at $45,000. The printing costs are a flat $7000 for setup plus $8.00 per book. The author's royalty is 8% of the publisher's selling price to bookstores. Advertising and promotion costs are budgeted at $8000.
a. If the price to bookstores is set at $35, how many books must be sold to break even? (Round the answer up to the nearest whole number.)
b. The marketing department is forecasting sales of 4800 books at the $35 price. What will be the net income from the project at this volume of sales?
A copper wire has a material cost that varies proportionally with the cross-sectional area (A)
according to the expression $40,000 A. This wire has a lifetime of 30 years and a salvage value of
$1500 A at that time. As the cross-sectional area of the wire increases, the resistance of the wire
decreases such that the energy losses in the wire also decrease. The costs of these energy losses
vary indirectly with the cross-sectional area according to the expression $70,000/A. Assuming an
interest of 9%, what is the optimal value for this cross-sectional area?
(Chapter 6- Annual Equivalent Worth Analysis)
Chapter 12 Solutions
Engineering Economy
Ch. 12 - Prob. 1PCh. 12 - Prob. 2PCh. 12 - A new snow making machine utilizes technology that...Ch. 12 - Prob. 4PCh. 12 - Prob. 5PCh. 12 - Prob. 6PCh. 12 - Prob. 7PCh. 12 - Prob. 8PCh. 12 - Prob. 9PCh. 12 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 12 - Prob. 11PCh. 12 - Prob. 12PCh. 12 - Prob. 13PCh. 12 - Prob. 14PCh. 12 - Prob. 15PCh. 12 - Prob. 16PCh. 12 - Prob. 17PCh. 12 - Prob. 18PCh. 12 - Prob. 19PCh. 12 - Prob. 20PCh. 12 - Prob. 21PCh. 12 - Prob. 22PCh. 12 - If the interest rate is 8% per year, what decision...Ch. 12 - Prob. 24PCh. 12 - Prob. 25PCh. 12 - Prob. 26SE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that, for a certain potential investment project, the optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic estimates are as shown in the accompanying table. Optimistic $90,000 11 years $30,000 $36,000 12% Most Likely $100,000 7 years $20,000 $27,000 12% Capital investment Useful life Market value Net annual cash flow MARR (per year) Pessimistic $122,000 5 years $0 $18,000 12% a. What is the AW for each of the three estimation conditions? b. It is thought that the most critical factors are useful life and net annual cash flow. Develop a table showing the net AW for all combinations of the estimates for these two factors, assuming all other factors to be at their most likely values. Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 12% per year.arrow_forwardTwo projects are independent if the expected costs and the expected benefits of each project do not depend on whether the other one is chosen. Select one: True False 35arrow_forwardPat James, the purchasing agent for a local plant of the Oakden Electronics Division, was considering the possible purchase of a component from a new supplier. The component’s purchase price, $0.90, compared favorably with the standard price of $1.10. Given the quantity that would be purchased, Pat knew that the favorable price variance would help to offset an unfavorable variance for another component. By offsetting the unfavorable variance, his overall performance report would be impressive and good enough to help him qualify for the annual bonus. More importantly, a good performance rating this year would help him to secure a position at division headquarters at a significant salary increase. Purchase of the part, however, presented Pat with a dilemma. Consistent with his past behavior, Pat made inquiries regarding the reliability of the new supplier and the part’s quality. Reports were basically negative. The supplier had a reputation for making the first two or three deliveries on…arrow_forward
- When the country’s economy is expanding, AB Investment Company is optimistic and expects a MARR of 15% on new investments. However, in a receding economy the expected return is 8%. Normally a 10% per year return is anticipated. An expanding economy causes the estimates of project life to go down about 20%, and a receding economy causes the life values to increase about 10%. Additionally, the market value after the project’s life varies widely; optimistically, it may be as high as 50% more or as low as 75% of the initial investment. (a) Summarize the optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic estimates in tabular form. (b) Use a spreadsheet to calculate and plot the sensitivity of PW versus (1) MARR, (2) life values, and (3) market value for possible investment in one of two locations. Use the most likely estimates for the other parameters. (c) Considering all the analyses, under which scenario, if any, should location Miami or Houston be rejected? All monetary values are in $1000 units.…arrow_forwardConsider the following investment opportunity: Capital Investment (End of Year 0) Expenses (per year) Revenues (geometric series) $450,000 $25,000 $60,000 in the first year, increasing 5% per year following Market value (End of Year 20) Study Period (years) MARR (per year) $90,000 20 years 10% 10% Interest Tablearrow_forwardA stock is currently at $20. It can go to $22 or $18 in 3 months. The risk free rate is 12% per year. A call option with a strike price of $21 is available. If the real world expected return on the stock is 16% per year, what is the implied real world discount rate for the option.arrow_forward
- Consolidated Edison Power is evaluating the construction of a new electric generation facility. The two choices are a coal-burning plant (CB) and a gaseous diffusion (GD) plant. The CB plant will cost $160 per megawatt to construct, and the GD plant will cost $180 per megawatt. Owing to uncertainties concerning fuel availability and the impact of future regulations related to air and water quality, the useful life of each plant is unknown, but the following probability estimates have been made .a. Determine the expected life of each plant. b. Based on the ratio of construction cost per megawatt to expected life, which plant would you recommend that Con Ed build?arrow_forwardbased on net worth analysis, which of the following project is acceptablearrow_forwardThe investor-developer would not be comfortable with a 7.8 percent return on cost because the margin for error is too risky. If construction costs are higher or rents are lower than anticipated, the project may not be feasible. The asking price of the project is $4,600,000 and the construction cost per unit is $80,400. The current rent to justify the land acqusition is $1.3 per square foot. The weighted average is 900 square feet per unit. Average vacancy and Operating expenses are 5% and 35% of Gross Revenue respectively. Use the following data to rework the calculations in Concept Box 16.2 in order to assess the feasibility of the project: Required: a. Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per acre. What is the percentage return on total cost under the revised proposal? Is the…arrow_forward
- Consider the following cash flow diagram. The probability of the pessimistic value of N = 4 years is 0.30, the probability of the most likely value of N = 6 years is 0.50, and the probability of the optimistic value of N = 9 years is 0.2. What is the expected value of the present worth of this project when the interest rate is 8% per year?arrow_forwardEaton Medical Services is evaluating 10 independent indivisible projects, all with positive NPV. The company's capital budgeting for the year is limited to a maximum of $5,000,000. (A) Use solver to find the optimum combination of projects the company should accept, under the assumption that A and B are mutually exclusive and one of them has to be selected. (B) Ignore the constraint from previous part, assume that project “I” has to be accepted. Use solver to find optimum combination of projects the company should accept now. Please show all steps to compute in excel using solver to get to the right answers. Thank you in advance, will upvote! Project Cost NPV A 1,061,191 122,737 B 561,758 58,102 C 1,647,849 280,660 D 1,026,020 89,365 E 191,870 17,568 F 1,333,625 76,960 G 3,102,642 123,240 H 275,568 79,367 I 2,044,070 60,506 J 1,017,567 56,690arrow_forwardAn electric utility is taking bids for the purchase, installation, and operation of decentralized battery storage systems. The table below has some details for the two bids received. a) Which is the most economical bid if the rate is 11%. None of the batteries are expected to have a salvage value after 30 years of use. (Actual expected service life is listed in the bid) b) Also solve using NPW method to compare these two mutually exclusive plans Equipment cost Installation cost Annual Inspection and Maintenance fee Annual extra income taxes Life Salvage Value Bid A $112,000 $25,000 $2,000 0 40 years 0 Bid B $98,000 $30,000 $2,000 $800 35 years 0arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education