Surfing the Standards Case 1: Impairments of PPE under IFRS
A&N, Inc. is a manufacturer and retailer of specialized office equipment. It currently operates in two countries, both of which follow IFRS for their financial reporting. For the sake of simplicity, assume that both countries have the same currency, the dollar. During its annual impairment assessment of PPE, A&N determined that one of its factories presents with various impairment indicators. Facts related to this factory follow:
1. The estimated future life of the factory is 20 to 25 years, and it has a current carrying value of $1,200,000.
2. A&N has no sales agreement for the factory, nor does an active market exist. It did sell a similar factory several years ago in another country for $1,000,000. The costs to sell the factory were $67,000.
3. A&N has a similar factory in the other country in which it currently operates. Due to differences in the market for their products in the two countries, the cash flow streams will not be similar.
4. The table on the next page presents the projected cash inflows for the factory based on the most recent budgets approved by management.
5. Although management can demonstrate that its short-term projects tend to be reasonably accurate, there is some uncertainty as to the projected cash flows. Management assesses that there is a range on either side of the projected cash inflows: The cash inflows could be as much as 10% lower than projected or 5% greater than projected. While the most likely amount is included m the following schedule presented, the probabilities associated with each amount are unknown.
6. The table on the next page also presents the total projected cash outflows for overhead as well as specific projected outflows for maintenance of the factory. Generally, 25% of overhead is allocable to the use of the factory.
7. The increase in projected cash inflows in Year 4 is related to a planned overhaul of the factory. The estimated
8. The cash-flow amounts presented are net of the corporate tax rate of 20%.
9. A&N anticipates a steady long-term growth rate of 3%. Its historical growth rate has been 0.5%.
10. Management anticipates that it will ultimately sell the factory for $1,000,000 because that is the amount of the last factory sale and that disposal costs will be similar to those incurred for the last sale. Because this anticipated sale is far off in time, the confidence range on this transaction is 50% less and 25% greater than these estimates. Although management finds it 60% likely that it will obtain the sales price of $1,000,000 (and disposal costs of $67,000), the firm believes that the bottom of the range and the top of the range are each 20% likely.
11. All cash flows are presented in nominal terms as opposed to real terms.
12 A&N’s pre-tax weighted cost of capital is currently 8%. Management expects this amount to increase in Year 4 to 9% due to a change in the term structure of interest rates. These rates include an expectation for general inflation.
13. The operations in the particular country in which this factory is located are a bit riskier due to political unrest than in the other country in which A&N operates. Management believes that this increased risk would translate into a 1% increase in the appropriate discount rate for the factory itself.
Read IAS 36, Impairment of Assets, paragraphs 18 through 57 as well as paragraphs A1 through A21 in its Appendix A. Provide answers to the following questions based upon this reading.
1. Because the determination of the amount of the impairment loss involves the use of the fair value (net of disposal costs), does A&N have to use the $933,000 net selling price of its other factory to approximate the fair value less disposal costs even though this number may not be very solid?
2. What adjustments does management need to make to the projected cash inflows presented in the following table in order to reflect projected cash inflows that are consistent with the requirements in IAS 36 for determining value in use?
3. What adjustment does management need to make to the projected cash outflows presented in the following table in order to reflect projected cash outflows that are consistent with the requirement in IAS 36 for determining value m use?
4. How should A&N include the expectations about the anticipated sale of the factory in the computation of value in use?
5. What discount rate should A&N use to compute value in use?
Original Projections by Management | ||||
Year | Projected Cash Inflows | Total Projected Overhead | Other Projected Cash Outflows | Total Cash Outflows |
1 | $70,000 | $8,000 | $2,500 | $10,500 |
2 | $73,000 | $8,040 | $2,500 | $10,540 |
3 | $72,000 | $8,080 | $2,500 | $10,580 |
4 | $83,000 | $8,121 | $52,500 | $60,621 |
5 | $84,000 | $8,161 | $2,500 | $10,661 |
6 | $86,520 | $8,202 | $2,500 | $10,702 |
7 | $89,116 | $8,243 | $2,500 | $10,743 |
8 | $91,789 | $8,284 | $2,500 | $10,784 |
9 | $94,543 | $8,326 | $2,500 | $10,826 |
10 | $97,379 | $8,367 | $2,500 | $10,867 |
11 | $100,300 | $8,409 | $2,500 | $10,909 |
12 | $103,309 | $8,451 | $2,500 | $10,951 |
13 | $106,409 | $8,493 | $2,500 | $10,993 |
14 | $109,601 | $8,536 | $2,500 | $11,036 |
15 | $112,889 | $8,579 | $2,500 | $11,079 |
16 | $116,276 | $8,621 | $2,500 | $11,121 |
17 | $119,764 | $8,665 | $2,500 | $11,165 |
18 | $123,357 | $8,708 | $2,500 | $11,208 |
19 | $127,058 | $8,751 | $2,500 | $11,251 |
20 | $130,869 | $8,795 | $2,500 | $11,295 |
21 | $134,795 | $8,839 | $2,500 | $11,339 |
22 | $138,839 | $8,883 | $2,500 | $11,383 |
23 | $143,004 | $8,928 | $2,500 | $11,428 |
24 | $147,295 | $8,972 | $2,500 | $11,472 |
25 | $151,713 | $9,017 | $2,500 | $11,517 |
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 12 Solutions
INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNTING-MYLAB W/ETEXT
- 1. block 2 2018 In relation to the reference period t1, Schmalisch GmbH shows an operating result of +88 T€, a financial result of -19 T€ and a tax result of -31 T€. All results were determined based on commercial law regulations. In addition, you can see from the information in the appendix that at t1 the operating result was charged with an accidental uninsured cargo of €18k. Let us assume that the internal control system in the company will ensure in the future that all cargoes are insured! How high is the annual surplus under commercial law at t1 and how high is the sustainable annual output at t1? Present your calculations in an understandable way Why does it make sense to determine a sustainable annual result?arrow_forwardIDENTIFY THE EFFECT OF THE FOLLOWING TRANSACTION TO THE RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. The company recently opened up its new international branch in HongKong, catering to Overseas Filipino Workers in that location. Does it have a: A. INCREASE effect B. DECREASE effect C. NO EFFECT effectarrow_forward2019 1. A company must prepare an HGB financial statement as of December 31, t1. The company is legally obliged to clean up contaminated sites caused by 2.3.t1.This contaminated site remediation is to be carried out by a third-party company on 6.7.t2; You have received a cost estimate from the third-party company for this in the gross amount of EUR 357,000.a) Go into detail about the creation of provisions in the present case as of December 31, t1, and, if necessary, also state the posting. Assume that no provision was recognized for the facts stated in the balance sheet as of 12/31/t0! b) Why is a provision and not a liability to be recognized under a)?c) On 6.7.t2 the third-party company will carry out the remediation of contaminated sites. The bill is presented on the same day in the amount of 357 T€ gross and you pay it immediately in cash. How to book?arrow_forward
- For each of the following situation, discuss with reason whether the company has to make provision in accordance to MFRS 137: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets. i. Entity A operated in the palm oil manufacturing business. Under a new legislation, the entity is required to fit smoke filters to its palm oil mills by 30 June 2016. As at 31 December 2015, Entity A has not fitted the smoke filters. The costs to fit the smoke filters are estimated at RM 4 million. As at 31 December 2016, Entity A still has not fitted the smoke filters and therefore faces a probable fine or penalty by law. ii. A company operates profitably from a factory that it has leased under an operating lease. Annual lease rentals totaled RM 120000. During the year ended 31 December 2015, the company relocates its operations to a new factory. The lease on the old factory continues for the next four years which is up to 31 December…arrow_forwardAccounting standard IAS16: Property, Plant and Equipment make a number of recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements with regard to tangible non-current assets. The term "non-current asset" is defined in accounting standard IAS1: Presentation of Financial Statements. The information given below relates to two companies, both of which prepare accounts by 31 December. Tom Limited: Joy Plc bought a factory machine on 30 June 2020 and paid a total of £420,000. The supplier's invoice showed that this sum was made up of the following items: £ Manufacturer's list price 380,000 Less: Trade discount 38,000 342,000 Delivery charge 6,800 Installation costs 29,600 Maintenance charge for a year to 30 June 2021 27,000 Small spare parts 14,600 £420,000 Jerry Limited: On 1 January 2010, Jerry Ltd bought freehold property for £800,000. This figure was made up of land £300,000 and buildings £500,000. The land was non-depreciable…arrow_forwardEntity 2 purchased a specialist machine from a US supplier on 1 January 2021. The trade price was $500,000. The machine was delivered on 1 February with a delivery charge of $2,500 applied by the US supplier. An import duty of £75,000 was levied by the HMRC. Entity 2 incurred a further £15,000 to install the machine in its Manchester factory. By 1 March 2021, the machine was fully operational. The machine has a useful economic life of 10 years with no residual value. A dismantling expense of £45,000 is expected to incur at the end of 2030. On 1 July 2021, the factory was temporary shut down due to the Covid restrictions and a shortage of staff. It was re-opened on 1 August 2021. Entity 2 paid the US supplier the full invoice amount of $502,500 on 1 March 2021. The following exchange rates are available: Dates 1 January 2021 1 February 2021 1 March 2021 31 December 2021 $ to £1 1.245 1.327 1.298 1.276 Entity 2 has a cost of capital of 10% per annum. Depreciation is calculated on a…arrow_forward
- Accounting standard IAS16: Property, Plant and Equipment make a number of recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements with regard to tangible non-current assets. The term "non-current asset" is defined in accounting standard IAS1: Presentation of Financial Statements. The information given below relates to two companies, both of which prepare accounts by 31 December. Tom Limited: Joy Plc bought a factory machine on 30 June 2020 and paid a total of £420,000. The supplier's invoice showed that this sum was made up of the following items: £ Manufacturer's list price 380,000 Less: Trade discount 38,000 342,000 Delivery charge 6,800 Installation costs 29,600 Maintenance charge for a year to 30 June 2021 27,000 Small spare parts 14,600 £420,000 Jerry Limited: On 1 January 2010, Jerry Ltd bought freehold property for £800,000. This figure was made up of land £300,000 and buildings £500,000. The land was non-depreciable…arrow_forwardAssume that a foreign company using IFRS is owned by a company using U.S. GAAP. Thus, IFRS balances must be converted to U.S. GAAP to prepare consolidated financial statements. Ignore income taxes for given problem. Tapatio S.A. de C.V. acquired a new piece of manufacturing equipment on January 1, 2016, for a cash price of 500,000 pesos. The equipment was expected to have a useful life of 10 years and no residual value, and is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. On January 1, 2017, the equipment was appraised and determined to have a fair value of 540,000 pesos, zero salvage value, and a remaining useful life of 9 years. Tapatio uses the revaluation model in IAS 16 to measure equipment subsequent to acquisition. Any revaluation surplus will be recycled to retained earnings when the equipment is disposed of.a. Determine the appropriate accounting for this equipment for the years ending December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, under (1) IFRS and (2) U.S. GAAP. b. Prepare the…arrow_forwardAssume that a U.S.-based company is issuing securities to foreign investors who require financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Thus, adjustments to convert from U.S. GAAP to IFRS must be made. Ignore income taxes for given problem. Hirsch Company acquired equipment at the beginning of 2017 at a cost of $135,000. The equipment has a five-year life with no expected salvage value and is depreciated on a straight-line basis. At December 31, 2017, Hirsch compiled the following information related to this equipment: Expected future cash flows from use of the equipment . . . . . . . . $116,000Present value of expected future cash flows from use of the equipment . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000Fair value (selling price less costs to dispose) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96,600 a. Determine the appropriate accounting for this equipment for the years ending December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, under (1) U.S. GAAP and (2) IFRS.b. Prepare the entry(ies) that Hirsch would…arrow_forward
- ! Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Turtle Creek Partnership had the following revenues, expenses, gains, losses, and distributions: Sales revenue Long-term capital gains Cost of goods sold Depreciation-MACRS Amortization of organization costs. Guaranteed payments to partners for general management Cash distributions to partners $ 65,500 $ 4,800 Ordinary income (loss) $ (22,100) $ (7,900) $ (1,240) $ (15,600) $ (3,600) a. Given these items, what is Turtle Creek's ordinary business income (loss) for the year?arrow_forward63. Analyze the following: I – All entities that issue an annual report may issue interim financial report. II – One indicator that sale of a noncurrent asset held for sale is highly probable is that there is an active program to locate a buyer and a complete plan must have been initiated. III – When a component of an entity was discontinued during the current year, the loss on discontinued operation should exclude associated employee termination cost. Given these, we can conclude that: Group of answer choices Only statements I and II are false. Statement II is true. Statement III is not false. Only statements II and III are true.arrow_forwardNote: For all scenarios, support your answers with citations from the authoritative IFRS and U.S. GAAP literature. Scenario 4 Under new legislation, FuelSource is required to install smoke filters in its factories by June 30, 20X2. As of December 31, 20X1, FuelSource had not yet installed the smoke filters. Required: Should FuelSource recognize a provision as of December 31, 20X1, (1) in reporting to its U.K. parent under IFRS and (2) in reporting to its U.S.-based lender in accordance with U.S. GAAP?arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningFinancial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...FinanceISBN:9781285190907Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark BradshawPublisher:Cengage LearningAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
- Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage