Principles of Microeconomics (12th Edition)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780134081199
Author: CASE
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 3.3P
To determine
The cause of inefficient outcome.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Becky and Sarah are sisters who share a room. Their room can easily get messy, and their parents are always telling them to tidy it. Here are the costs and benefits to both Becky and Sarah of taking the time to clean their room: If both Becky and Sarah clean, they each spend two hours and get a clean room. If Becky decides not to clean and Sarah does all the cleaning, then Sarah spends 10 hours cleaning (Becky spends 0) but Sarah is exhausted. The same would occur for Becky if Sarah decided not to clean—Becky spends 10 hours and becomes exhausted. If both girls decide not to clean, they both have a dirty room.
What is the best outcome for Becky and Sarah? What is the worst outcome? (It would help you to construct a prisoner’s dilemma table.)
Becky and Sarah are sisters who share a room. Their room can easily get messy, and their parents are always telling them to tidy it. Here are the costs and benefits to both Becky and Sarah of taking the time to clean their room: If both Becky and Sarah clean, they each spend two hours and get a clean room. If Becky decides not to clean and Sarah does all the cleaning, then Sarah spends 10 hours cleaning (Becky spends 0) but Sarah is exhausted. The same would occur for Becky if Sarah decided not to clean—Becky spends 10 hours and becomes exhausted. If both girls decide not to clean, they both have a dirty room.
What is the best outcome for Becky and Sarah? What is the worst outcome? (It would help you to construct a prisoner’s dilemma table.)
Unfortunately, we know that the optimal outcome will most likely not happen, and that the sisters probably will choose the worst one instead. Explain what it is about Becky’s and Sarah’s reasoning that will lead them both to choose the worst…
Becky and Sarah are sisters who share a room. Their room can easily get messy, and their parents are always telling them to tidy it. Here are the costs and benefits to both Becky and Sarah, of taking the time to clean their room: If both Becky and Sarah clean, they each spends two hours and get a clean room. If Becky decides not to clean and Sarah does all the cleaning, then Sarah spends 10 hours cleaning (Becky spends 0) but Sarah is exhausted. The same would occur for Becky if Sarah decided not to clean—Becky spends 10 hours and becomes exhausted. If both girls decide not to clean, they both have a dirty room. a. What is the best outcome for Becky and Sarah? What is the worst outcome? (It would help you to construct a prisoner’s dilemma table.) b. Unfortunately, we know that the optimal outcome will most likely not happen, and that the sisters probably will choose the worst one instead. Explain what it is about Becky’s and Sarah’s reasoning that will lead them both to choose the…
Chapter 12 Solutions
Principles of Microeconomics (12th Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose you are part of an economic analysis team charged with recommending a policy response to pesticide risks. Explain the steps your team should take and why.arrow_forwardFirm A currently dumps 243 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 126 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives Firm A 61 pollution permits and gives Firm B 65 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $113 for Firm A and $165 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the government does NOT allow the firm to trade the permits between each other?arrow_forwardTwo alternative programs to save 50 more lives per year entail providing more cardiac intensive care facilities and redesigning dangerous highway interchanges. The price of a new cardiac intensive care unit is $500,000, and the price of redesigning and renovating a highway interchange is $1 million. One combination of the two programs that can save 500 lives is five cardiac units and three highway exit renovations. a.) Is the mix involving five cardiac units and three highway exit renovations cost-effective? b.) Assuming that the marginal products of both programs decline, what needs to be done to achieve the cost-effective mix of programs?arrow_forward
- A U.S. emergency relief agency is considering sending a team of experts to another country to treat a severely contagious disease outbreak. Each team costs $100,000 for this one-week-long job. The agency estimates effectiveness as follows: 0 teams = 1000 deaths;1 team = 500 deaths;2 teams = 250 deaths,3 teams = 50 deaths;4 teams = 50 deaths Number of Teams Number of Deaths 0 1,000 1 500 2 250 3 50 4 50 If the Agency is considering sending 3 teams vs. 2 teams, what is the marginal cost (in dollar terms) of sending the third team? If saving a life is valued at $200,000 then the optimal number of teams to send is _____.arrow_forwardShow the complete solution for this problemarrow_forwardDiscuss the Controllable Factors and Uncontrollable Factors.arrow_forward
- There is a bar on Off‐Main Street called the Rock‐n‐Roll Bar. All the people that go to that bar like to listen to rock‐n‐roll music, and they love live bands. If the bar owner brings bands in to play music on a Saturday night, she will make a lot of money. However there are tenants in this building who get annoyed by the loud music. The benefits/costs to the owner/tenants of having zero, one, two or three bands on a Saturday night are listed below. Assume the bar owner has the right to hire as many bands as she likes. Iftransaction costs were $90, split between the bar owner and the tenants, how manybands would play? What would social welfare be? A. Three bands would play and social welfare would be ‐100.B. Two bands would play and social welfare would be 75.C. Two bands would play and social welfare would be ‐15.D. No bands would play and social welfare would be 0.E. Three bands would play and social welfare would be ‐190arrow_forwardDifferentiate between technical efficiency and economic efficiency with examplesarrow_forwardMany highways have designated car pool or highoccupancy lanes. Generally, only cars containing at least two people can use these lanes. Single drivers are fined heavily if they are caught using these lanes. With new technologies, it is possible to charge drivers using car pool lanes by recording identifying markings on the car and billing the owners. Would allowing single drivers to pay to use car pool lanes increase economic efficiency? Explain.arrow_forward
- A fast-food company spends millions of dollars to develop and promote a new hamburger on its menu only to find that consumers won't buy it because they don& like the taste. From an economic perspective, the company should keep the hamburger on the menu because they spent so much money and time developing and promoting the product. spend more money to develop a more efficient way to cook the hamburger so it cooks in a shorter time. pull the hamburger off the menu and treat the development and promotion expenditures as a sunk cost. keep trying to sell the hamburger so that people who developed and promote it have a job with the company.arrow_forwardA fast-food company spends millions of dollars to develop and promote a new hamburger on its menu only to find that consumers won& buy it because they done like the taste. From an economic perspective, the company should.......... keep the hamburger on the menu because they have spent so much money and time developing and promoting the product. spend more money to develop a more efficient way to cook the hamburger so it cooks in a shorter time. pull the hamburger off the menu and treat the development and promotion expenditures as a sunk cost. keep trying to sell the hamburger so that people who developed and promote it have a job with the company.arrow_forwardFirm A currently dumps 247 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 246 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives Firm A 32 pollution permits and gives Firm B 48 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $153 for Firm A and $89 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the firms are .allowed to trade permits between each other?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning