Our Origins: Discovering Physical Anthropology (Fourth Edition)
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780393614008
Author: Clark Spencer Larsen
Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 4ER
Summary Introduction
To describe: That how the elements of both Out-of-Africa and Multiregional Continuity models contribute to the Assimilation model.
Introduction: There are several hypotheses have been given for the evolution of archaic humans to the present Homo sapiens. The two main hypothesis that explains the origin of modern Homo sapiens are Out-of-Africa and Multiregional Continuity model.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Compare and contrast the multiregional and replacement models for human origins in the table below.
If you are struggling with this, see the PowerPoint on the origins and dispersal of modern humans and review the tutorial: https://www2.palomar.edu/anthro/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm
Multiregional Model
Replacement
Main argument of this model
Evidence that supports this model
Based on the evidence, which model of human origins is best supported?
If phenotype is a proxy for genotype, then why do you think that paleoanthropologists erroneously designated Neandertalensis as a separate species prior to the accessibility of DNA analysis? What were they comparing them to when they were lumping or splitting fossils taxonomically and why would these reference populations provide the bias resulting in such a confounding factor in their assessments?
Explain the barriers to interbreeding separate populations as the basis for the evolution of new species. Provide examples for each of the barriers.
Chapter 12 Solutions
Our Origins: Discovering Physical Anthropology (Fourth Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Explain what is meant by Cultural Evolution (with examples) and discuss why we say it occurs by Lamarckian methods? What is the significance of Lamarckian methods for Cultural Evolution?arrow_forwardPlease associate the explanation with the correct de-extinction methods, some of which are still only possible in theory. Genes from extinct species are cut and pasted into the genome of a relative species using the molecular tool CRISPR. Relatives of the extinct species are hybridized or selected of specific traits with the goal of creating morphologically similar species that can perform the same ecological function as the extinct relative. The nucleus of an intact cell from an extinct species is inserted into the egg of a living relative. 1. Back-breeding 2. Cloning 3. Genomic reconstructionarrow_forwardHow do mechanisms of speciation, such as genetic isolation, reproductive barriers, and ecological factors, apply to the human-chimp-gorilla trichotomy? Discuss the role of these mechanisms in driving speciation and shaping the evolutionary relationships among humans, chimps, and gorillas, based on genetic evidence such as comparative genomics and molecular phylogenetics.arrow_forward
- Try to outline a scenario explaining the evolution of the three species shown in panel g. Use migration, mutation, genetic drift, selection, reproductive isolation, gene flow, extinction, and many generations in your scenario. Based on your scenario, what are the components that are necessary in a population in order for it to split or diverge into two new daughter species from a single ancestor (the parent species)?arrow_forwardHow does the fact that all ethnic groups except Africans contain some Neanderthal DNA (1–4 percent of their DNA) support the out-of-Africa hypothesis for the origin of modern humans (Homo sapiens)?arrow_forwardConsider the following sample dataset of character traits for five taxa (A, B, C, D, and E) and an outgroup (O) and answer the following: Taxon, Character 1 A B C D 1 1 1 0 0 Character 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 Character 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 Character 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 (A) Identify which character traits are ancestral and which are derived, (B) Determine the two taxa most closely related to each other (C) Are any of the character traits obvious homoplasies? If so, which ones? (D) Name three taxa that if put in their own taxonomic group would be considered paraphyletic.arrow_forward
- The figure shows a phylogenetic tree of various members of the order Proboscidea, which includes modern elephants. Which of the following claims is best supported by the information in the figure ? a.The mastodon and the Stegodon diverged from their common ancestor 22 million years ago. b.The common ancestor of the African elephant and the mastodon is the Palaeomastodon. c.The mammoth diverged from its most recent common ancestor with African elephants before the mastodon diverged from its most recent common ancestor with Stegodons. d.The Asian and African elephants are the most closely related species shown on the tree.arrow_forwardWhat types of information are used to hypothesize how species arerelated to one another by descent from a shared ancestor? Give anexample of how multiple types of evidence can support one another.arrow_forwardhttps://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/110301_pcbresistantcod (ARTICLE LINK) QUESTIONS: 1. Review the process of natural selection. Use the steps to explain how PCB resistance became so common among tomcod in the Hudson. Be sure to include the terms mutation, fitness, selective pressure, and adaptation in your explanation. 2. In this blog post, the author describes the tomcod as "a quick learner" because of the population's adaptation to PCBs. Is "learning" an accurate way to describe the change in the Hudson River tomcod population? Why or why not? 3. The data shown on the map above support the hypothesis that natural selection for PCB resistance has occurred among tomcod in the Hudson. What sort of evidence regarding gene frequencies in different populations would argue against this hypothesis (i.e., imagine what the scientists would have observed in this study if natural selection on the AHR gene had not occurred among Hudson River tomcod)? 4. Why is it not accurate to…arrow_forward
- Match the terms to their descriptors. NOTE: If you want to change your selection, you'll need to delete the one you already chose. After you delete it, the list of choices will pop back up and you can make a different choice. Two species evolve in different directions from a common starting point Divergent evolution Two species independently evolve similar structures Homologous structures Traits that look similar but were not inherited from a common Convergent evolution ancestor Analogous structures Traits that are similar because they were inherited from a common ancestorarrow_forwardBriefly discuss the differences in how a selectionist (one that believes that Natural Selection is a strong evolutionary force) and a neutralist (one that believes that genetic drift is a strong evolutionary force) views the following: molecular clock, evolution of coding sequences, evolution of "pseudogenes".arrow_forwardLocate two instances of Darwinian evolution being misrepresented by a Lamarckian approach in the media (print, electronic, etc.). Give the following information for both.Its beginnings?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)BiologyISBN:9780134580999Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. HoehnPublisher:PEARSON
Biology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStax
Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781259398629Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa StouterPublisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)BiologyISBN:9780815344322Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter WalterPublisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781260159363Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, CynthiaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)BiologyISBN:9781260231700Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael WindelspechtPublisher:McGraw Hill Education
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:9781947172517
Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:9781259398629
Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9780815344322
Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:9781260159363
Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9781260231700
Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:McGraw Hill Education
The Evolution of Populations: Natural Selection, Genetic Drift, and Gene Flow; Author: Professor Dave Explains;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRWXEMlI0_U;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
The Evolution of Humans | Evolution | Biology | FuseSchool; Author: FuseSchool - Global Education;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vf_dDp7drFg;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY