Contemporary Engineering Economics Plus MyLab Engineering with eText -- Access Card Package (6th Edition)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134162690
Author: Chan S. Park
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 7P
(a):
To determine
Selection of the project.
(b):
To determine
Calculate the breakeven operating cost.
(c):
To determine
Calculate the present worth.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
A UK manufacturer of particle board furniture is considering investing in a new stamping machine. The machine is expected to have a useful life of five years, after which the machine can be sold as scrap for an estimated £5000. The firm plans to issue bonds to pay for the machine and intends to treat the interest rate on the bonds as the relevant discount rate for evaluating the project. The machine will cost the firm £175,000, all of which must be paid at the beginning of the project. The new stamping machine will reduce costs £50,000 per year, for each year of the machineʹs life. The firm treats all the cost savings as if they occur at year end. Should the firm plan to undertake the investment project, bonds will be issued in approximately three months. The firm has estimated the supply and demand for loanable funds given by these equations:LD = 25,000,000 - 125,000,000r LS = 2,500,000 + 62,500,000r(1) Given the information above, should the firm undertake the investment in the…
Smith and Co. has to choose between two mutually exclusive projects. If it chooses project A, Smith and Co. will have the opportunity to make a similar investment in three years. However, if it chooses project B, it will not have the opportunity to make a second investment. The following table lists the cash flows for these projects. If the firm uses the replacement chain (common life) approach, what will be the difference between the net present value (NPV) of project A and project B, assuming that both projects have a weighted average cost of capital of 10%?
Cash Flow
Project A
Project B
Year 0:
–$17,500
Year 0:
–$40,000
Year 1:
10,000
Year 1:
8,000
Year 2:
16,000
Year 2:
16,000
Year 3:
15,000
Year 3:
15,000
Year 4:
12,000
Year 5:
11,000
Year 6:
10,000
$15,731
$11,012
$12,585
$9,439
$14,158
Smith and Co. is considering a three-year project that has a weighted average cost of capital…
Your company is considering a new computer system with an initial cost of $1 million. When implemented, the system will save $300,000 per year in inventory and administration costs. The system has a service life of five years and is classified in the three-year MACRS category. At the end of the fifth year, its residual value was estimated at $50,000. The system has no impact on net working capital. The marginal tax rate is 40 per cent. The required rate of return is 8 per cent.
Chapter 12 Solutions
Contemporary Engineering Economics Plus MyLab Engineering with eText -- Access Card Package (6th Edition)
Ch. 12 - Prob. 1PCh. 12 - Prob. 2PCh. 12 - Prob. 3PCh. 12 - Prob. 4PCh. 12 - Prob. 5PCh. 12 - Prob. 7PCh. 12 - Prob. 8PCh. 12 - Prob. 9PCh. 12 - Prob. 10PCh. 12 - Prob. 11P
Ch. 12 - Prob. 12PCh. 12 - Prob. 13PCh. 12 - Prob. 14PCh. 12 - Prob. 15PCh. 12 - Prob. 16PCh. 12 - Prob. 17PCh. 12 - Prob. 18PCh. 12 - Prob. 19PCh. 12 - Prob. 20PCh. 12 - Prob. 21PCh. 12 - Prob. 22PCh. 12 - Prob. 23PCh. 12 - Prob. 24PCh. 12 - Prob. 25PCh. 12 - Prob. 26PCh. 12 - Prob. 27PCh. 12 - Prob. 28P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- AMT, Inc., is considering the purchase of a digital camera for the maintenance of design specifications by feeding digital pictures directly into an engineering workstation where computer-aided design files can be superimposed over the digital pictures. Differences between the two images can be noted, and corrections, as appropriate, can then be made by design engineer. The capital investment requirement is P345,000 and the estimated market value of the system after a six-year study period is P115,000. Annual revenues attributable to the new camera system will be P120,000, whereas additional annual expenses will be P20,000. The corporation's MARR is 20% per year. Show whether this is a desirable investment by using the ERR method.arrow_forwardA small manufacturing firm is considering the purchase of a new machine to modernize one of its current production lines. Two types of machines are available on the market. The lives of Machine A and Machine B are four years and six years, respectively, but the firm does not expect to need the service of either machine for more than five years. The machines have the following expected receipts and disbursements: After four years of use, the salvage value for Machine B will be $1,000. The firm always has another option: to lease a machine at $3,000 per year, fully maintained by the leasing company. The lease payment will be made at the beginning of each year.(a) How many decision alternatives are there?(b) Which decision appears to be the best at i = 10%?arrow_forwardCT Corp. is considering two mutually exclusive projects. Both require an initial investment of P120,000 at t = 0. Project X has an expected life of 2 years with after-tax cash inflows of P67,000 and P75,000 at the end of Years 1 and 2, respectively. In addition, Project X can be repeated at the end of Year 2 with no changes in its cash flows. Project Y has an expected life of 4 years with after-tax cash inflows of P38,500 at the end of each of the next 4 years. Each project has a WACC of 8%. Listed below are the requirements for this data set: Using the replacement chain approach, how much is the NPV of Project X? (Round the final answer to the nearest peso. Use the "NPV formula" in excel for exact computation. Otherwise, answer based on rounded pv factors will also be accepted.) Which of the two projects will be more profitable considering the replacement chain approach on the NPV of Project X? Using the equivalent annuity approach, what is the equivalent annuity of Project Y?…arrow_forward
- You are evaluating two different silicon wafer milling machines. The Techron I costs $228,000, has a three-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $59,000 per year. The Techron II costs $400,000, has a five-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $32,000 per year. For both milling machines, use straight-line depreciation to zero over the project’s life and assume a salvage value of $36,000. If your tax rate is 24 percent and your discount rate is 8 percent, compute the EAC for both machines. Note: Your answer should be a negative value and indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.arrow_forwardA radiology clinic is considering buying a new $700,000 x-ray machine, which will have no salvage value after installation because the cost of removal will be approximately equal to its sales value. Maintenance is estimated at $24,000 per year as long as the machine is owned. After 10 years the x-ray source will be depleted and the machine must be scrapped. Which of the following represents the most economic life of this x-ray machine? Solve a.One year, because it will have no salvage after installation b. Five years, because the maintenance costs are constant c. Ten years, because maintenance costs don't increase d. Cannot be determined from the information given.arrow_forwardYou have been asked to evaluate whether a project to preserve an area of forest should go ahead or whether the land should be converted to agriculture. The net benefits of ecosystem goods and services have been valued over the next four years at R6000, R10 000, R14 000 and R22 000 respectively. The immediate cost of preserving the forest is R23 500. Assume that MWTP = 90 - 3Q and MC = 10 + 2Q. The discount rate is 7%.arrow_forward
- Consider the following two mutually exclusive service projects with projectlives of three years and two years, respectively. (The mutually exclusive service projects will have identical revenues for each year of service.) The interest rate is known to be 12%. Net Cash Flow End of Year Project A Project B 0 -$1,000 -$800 1 -400 -200 2 -400 -200+0 3 -400+200 If the required service period is six years and both projects can be repeated with the given costs and better service projects are unavailable in the future, which project is better and why? Choose from the following options:(a) Select Project B because it will save you $344 in present worth over the required service period.(b) Select Project A because it will cost $1,818…arrow_forwardLiberty Airways is considering an investment of$800,000 in ticket purchasing kiosks at selected airports.The kiosks (hardware and software) have an expectedlife of four years. Extra ticket sales are expected to be60,000 per year at a discount price of $40 per ticket.Fixed costs, excluding depreciation of the equipment,are $400,000 per year, and variable costs are $24 perticket. The kiosks will be depreciated over four years,using the SL method with a zero salvage value. Theonetime commitment of working capital is expected tobe 1/12 of annual sales dollars. The after-tax MARR is15% per year, and the company pays income tax at therate of 34%. What’s the after-tax PW of this proposedinvestment? Should the investment be made?arrow_forwardReplacement versus expansion cash flows- Tesla Systems has estimated the cash flows over the five-year lives of a project that will install new equipment to replace old equipment. If the firm makes this investment, it will sell the old equipment and receive after-tax proceeds of $1,551,000. If the firm decides not to undertake this project, the old equipment will remain in service and generate the cash flows listed in years 1 through 5, and it will have no value after five years. These cash flows are summarized in the following table: New equipment Old equipmentNew equipment cost -4,645,000 Year Operating cash flows 1 551,000 372,000 2 931,000 372,000 3 1,344,000 372,000 4 2,221,000 372,000 5 3,399,000 372,000 New Equipment Old Equipment New Equipment Cost -$4,645,000 Year Operating Cash Flows 1 $551,000 $372,000 2 $931,000 $372,000 3 $1,344,000 $372,000 4 $2,221,000 $372,000 5 $3,399,000…arrow_forward
- Taxes are costs, and, therefore, changes in tax rates can affect consumer prices, project lives, and the value of existing firms. Evaluate the change in taxation on the valuation of the following project: Assumptions: Tax depreciation is straight-line over three years. Pre-tax salvage value is 25 in Year 3 and 50 if the asset is scrapped in Year 2. Tax on salvage value is 40% of the difference between salvage value and book value of the investment. The cost of capital is 20%.The table is attached Please verify that the information above yields NPV = 0. If you decide to terminate the project in Year 2, what would be the NPV of the project? Suppose that the government now changes tax depreciation to allow a 100% write-off in Year 1. How does this affect your answers to parts a and b above?arrow_forwardConsider the following two mutually exclusive investment projects that have unequal service lives: (a) What assumption(s) do you need in order to compare a set of mutually exclusive investments with unequal service lives?(b) With the assumption(s) defined in (a) and using i = 10%, determine which project should be selected.(c) If your analysis period (study period) is just three years, what should bethe salvage value of Project B at the end of year 3 in order to make the twoalternatives economically indifferent?arrow_forwardConsider the following two mutually exclusive investment projects: Salvage values represent the net proceeds (after tax) from the disposal of assets if they are sold at the end of the year listed. Both projects will be available (and can be repeated) with the same costs and salvage values for an indefinite period.(a) With an infinite planning horizon, which project is a better choice atMARR= 12%?(b) With a 10-year planning horizon, which project is a better choice atMARR= 12%?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education