EBK USING MIS
10th Edition
ISBN: 9780134658919
Author: KROENKE
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 12.4, Problem 7EGDQ
Explanation of Solution
Mention whether ethics on buying in on an in-house project is acceptable from categorical imperative and utilitarian point of view:
Kant’s Categorical Imperative:
Categorical imperative is that in all situations the complete requirements must be followed and it should be acceptable as an end in it.
- According to Kant One is being ethical if he or she is willing to publish their work. This is called Sunshine Law.
- Buying in on an in-house project may be unethical as in-house projects should be accurately projected and it will harm the organization if the project exceeds expected costs; which violates the Sunshine Law...
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
A case study showing how the students were successful in attaining the project's objectives must be provided. You may choose from the following choices: Discussions on the findings c. the deciding factor The abstract or the introduction?
For an in-house project, what is an ethical response to the marketing manager who says the project should be canceled if it will not be ready for the trade show? In your answer, suppose that you disagree with this opinion because you know the system has value regardless of whether it is done by the trade show.
Kindly answer the following question and help me the solution?
Chapter 12 Solutions
EBK USING MIS
Ch. 12.4 - Prob. 1EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 2EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 3EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 4EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 6EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 7EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 8EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 9EGDQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 10EGDQCh. 12.6 - Sports are one area in which the collection and...
Ch. 12.6 - Prob. 2BOIQCh. 12.6 - Prob. 3BOIQCh. 12.6 - Prob. 4BOIQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 1SGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 2SGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 3SGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 4SGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 5SGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 6SGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 7SGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 1CGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 2CGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 3CGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 4CGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 5CGDQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 12.1ARQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 12.2ARQCh. 12.7 - Prob. 12.3ARQCh. 12.7 - What are the phases in the systems development...Ch. 12.7 - What are the keys for successful SDLC projects?...Ch. 12.7 - How can scrum overcome the problems of the SDLC?...Ch. 12.7 - Prob. 12.7ARQCh. 12 - Prob. 12.1UYKCh. 12 - Prob. 12.4UYKCh. 12 - Prob. 12.5UYKCh. 12 - Prob. 12.6CE12Ch. 12 - Prob. 12.7CE12Ch. 12 - Prob. 12.8CE12Ch. 12 - Prob. 12.9CE12Ch. 12 - Describe three reasons why cases like this will...Ch. 12 - Prob. 12.11CS12Ch. 12 - Prob. 12.12CS12Ch. 12 - The project was known to be in trouble, but it...Ch. 12 - Prob. 12.14CS12
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- the answers should be based on a case study of project no customer escape from the Petrie electric case. for this cases, you may take refrence from modern system design and analysis.arrow_forwardFor the scenario below, analyze it by completing the following two phases. There are several examples of how to analyze a scenario in the text book starting on page 474. Brainstorming phase List all the people and organizations affected. (They are the stakeholders.) List risks, issues, problems, and consequences. List benefits and identify who gets each benefit. In cases where there is not a simple yes or no decision, but rather one has to choose some action, list possible actions. Analysis phase Identify responsibilities of the decision maker. (Consider responsibilities of both general ethics and professional ethics.) Identify rights of stakeholders. (It might be helpful to clarify whether they are negative or positive rights, in the sense of Section 1.4.2.) Consider the impact of each potential action on the stakeholders. Analyze consequences, risks, benefits, harms, and costs for each action considered. Find sections of the SE Code or the ACM Code that apply. Consider the…arrow_forwardThe examination of alternatives is one of the major tasks of a proposal team, especially for tender proposals. However, in many cases, important alternatives are omitted or neglected by the proposal team. 1. List real cases and common situations where negligence in defining and examining important alternatives can be expected. 2. In what situations are these types of discrepancies least likely to occur?arrow_forward
- The outcomes may include an increase of the scope or extra features. Give concrete examples to illustrate the distinctions between the two notions. What, in your perspective, causes these two issues? What would occur if these two bad outcomes happened at the same time that this project was the worst-case scenario?arrow_forwardSuppose that Ms. Hamir stacked the deck with her design proposal. In other words, she purposefully under-designed the less expensive solution and produced a cost estimate for the higher-end version that she knew would come in over budget if it were chosen. She also knew that the customer had a tendency to hire design consultants to do build projects. Discuss with your classmates if you think it is unethical to produce a consulting report that steers a client toward a specific outcome. Suppose instead that Ms. Hamir had prepared a report that truthfully recommended the more expensive option as the better choice for the customer in her best professional opinion. Suppose that the customer decided on the less expensive option solely to reduce costs without regard to the project's security outcomes. Would Ms. Hamir be ethically sound to urge reconsideration of such a decision? Why or why not, discuss this further with your classmates.arrow_forwardConsider that you are developing a project where people would choose to test themselves to go without using a computer for a fixed period of time. Describe how you would set up the project and why. Would you be willing to do go "computerless"?How long do you think you could commit to?What would be particularly challenging for you to avoid?What modifications would you have to make for school?What modifications would you have to make for socializing?How would this affect others?What things could you get done?arrow_forward
- It is of the utmost importance to provide a case study that details the ways in which the students were successful in accomplishing the objectives of their project. You have the choice between the following available alternatives: Discussions over the outcomes c. the very last phrase The introduction, or must we begin with the abstract?arrow_forwardUse your own criteria for evaluating usability to compare the two approaches. Will it work for what you need? Is it simple to read the time and other information constantly?arrow_forwardExplain the objectives hierarchy. Illustrate your answer by providing and drawing the objectives hierarchy for any system. show me the image or drawing the objectives hierarchy for any system.arrow_forward
- Testing for quality assurance in software is the subject of discussion. Let's say you're helping to build a website for a consortium of universities. Please give comments that are both comprehensive and informative, as well as reasons for the options you've selected. a) Outline which kind of testing strategies are suitable for the project. b) If you were in charge of the testing for the project, why and how would you do it?arrow_forwardEvaluate the following action taken by the team during the validation. For each scenario, identify its appropriateness (of action taken) by writing ‘appropriate’ or ‘not appropriate’ then map the case with the related validation principles. 1. The requirements engineer conducts an inspection of the requirements as mandated in the process and invites system architect, a programmer, a tester, and a legal compliance expert as inspectors. 2. Since no other project member was suitable to moderate the inspection meeting, the requirements engineer decides to be the moderator of the moderator meeting. 3. The requirements engineer decides to conduct the validation only once due to budget constraint. 4. Before the validation session begins, the requirements engineer reminds all reviewers to immediately correct the errors found in the document. 5. The inspection team requests for additional development artifact directly from the author. 6. The inspection team…arrow_forwardCreate your own spin on a use/abuse case diagram. It can be from any real-world or digital scenario but must include the legitimate use cases as well as the corresponding abuse cases.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Information Technology Project ManagementComputer ScienceISBN:9781337101356Author:Kathy SchwalbePublisher:Cengage Learning
Information Technology Project Management
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337101356
Author:Kathy Schwalbe
Publisher:Cengage Learning