MANAGERIAL/ECON+BUS/STR CONNECT ACCESS
9th Edition
ISBN: 2810022149537
Author: Baye
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 10CACQ
a.
To determine
To find: The maximum amount one would will to pay for the privilege of moving first.
b.
To determine
To find: The maximum amount one would will to pay for the privilege of moving second.
c.
To determine
To find: The maximum amount one would will to pay for the privilege of moving third.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
In the following game, determine the maximum amount you would be willing to pay for the privilege of moving (a) first, (b) second, or (c) third: There are three players, you and two rivals. The player announcing the largest integer gets a payoff of $10, that announcing the second largest integer gets $0, and that announcing the third largest integer gets $5
Three married couples in the state of Maryland—Bob and Carol, Ted and Alice, and Ross and Mike (remember, same-sex marriage is legal in the state of Maryland)—are thinking about renting a boat to go sailing on the Chesapeake Bay. The cost of a boat rental is $600. Each of the three couples puts some amount of money in an envelope. Thus, each player in this game is a couple. If the total amount collected is at least $600, then the boat is rented. If the amount collected is more than $600, then the money left over after renting the boat is spent on wine. If the total amount collected is less than $600, then they do not rent the boat, and the money is spent on a dinner. Assume the benefit to a couple from the boat trip is 400, the benefit from each dollar spent on wine is 50 cents, the benefit from each dollar spent on dinner is 40 cents, and the personal cost of the contribution to a couple equals the amount of contribution. For example, if the boat is rented, $50 of wine is purchased…
We consider the following three-player strategic form game, where Alice's strategies are U, C, and D, and Bob's strategies are L, M, and R, and Carol's strategies are A and B. Carol's strategy consists of choosing which table will be used for the payoffs, Table A or Table B.Table A is below, where for each cell the first number is Alice's payoff, the second number is Bob's payoff and the third number is Carol's payoff..
L
M
R
U
8,11,14
3,13,9
0,5,8
C
9,9,8
8,7,7
6,5,7
D
0,8,12
4,9,2
0,4,8
Table A
Table B is below, where again, for each cell, the first number is Alice's payoff, the second number is Bob's payoff and the third number is Carol's payoff..
L
M
R
U
14,1,0
13,2,11
1,3,2
C
0,0,2
7,2,3
14,3,2
D
7,12,11
12,12,0
2,11,2
Table B
This game may not have any Nash equilibrium in pure strategies, or it may have one or more equilibria.How many Nash equilibria does this game have?
Chapter 13 Solutions
MANAGERIAL/ECON+BUS/STR CONNECT ACCESS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Consider a game in which there is $4 to be divided, and the first mover is only permitted to make one of three proposals: (a) $3 for the first mover and $1 for the second mover, (b) $2 for each, or (c) $1 for the first movier and $3 for the second mover. The second mover is shown the proposal and can either accept, in which case it is implemented, or reject and cause each to earn $0. Show this game in extensive (tree) form. Be sure to show the payoffs for each person, with the first mover listed on the left, for each of the six terminal nodes.arrow_forwardTable 17-9 Nadia and Maddie are two college roommates who both prefer a clean common space in their dorm room, but neither enjoys cleaning. The roommates must each make a decision to either clean or not clean the dorm room's common space. The following table shows the payoffs for this situation, where the higher a player's payoff number, the better off that player is. Nadia Refer to Table 17-9. If Maddie chooses not to clean, then Nadia will O a. not clean, and Nadia's payoff will be 10. O b. clean, and Nadia's payoff will be 7. O c. not clean, and Nadia's payoff will be 30. O d. clean, and Nadia's payoff will be 50. Clean Don't Clean Clean Maddie = 30 Nadia = 30 Maddie = 7 Nadia = 50 Maddie Don't Clean Maddie = 50 Nadia = 7 Maddie = 10 Nadia = 10arrow_forwardIn the following two-user game, the payoffs of users Alice and Bob are exactly negative of each other in all the combinations of strategies (a,a), (a,b), (b,a), (b,b). This models an extreme case of competition, and is called a zero-sum game. Please point out every pure-strategy Nash equilibrium of this game, and explain why it is. a b a (1, -1) (3, -3) (2, -2) (5, -5)arrow_forward
- Assume a Hawk -Dove game with the following payoff matrix, where the first entry is Animal A’s payoff, and the second entry is Animal B’s payoff: Animal A (rows)/Animal B (columns) Hawk Dove Hawk (-5,-5) (10,0) Dove (0,10) (4,4) An animal that plays Hawk will always fight until it wins or is badly hurt. An animal that plays Dove makes a bold display but retreats if his opponent starts to fight. If two Dove animals meet they share. Explain why there cannot be an equilibrium where all animals act as Doves. Explore whether there are any Nash equilibria in pure strategies and explain which these are and why. Derive a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium (MSNE). What is the proportion of Hawks and Doves? If the proportion of Hawks in the population of animals is greater than the mixed strategy equilibrium proportion you calculated, which strategy does better, Hawks of Doves? Explain your answer. Draw the best response functions and show in the…arrow_forwardAssume a Hawk -Dove game with the following payoff matrix, where the first entry is Animal A’s payoff, and the second entry is Animal B’s payoff: Animal A (rows)/Animal B (columns) Hawk Dove Hawk (-5,-5) (10,0) Dove (0,10) (4,4) An animal that plays Hawk will always fight until it wins or is badly hurt. An animal that plays Dove makes a bold display but retreats if his opponent starts to fight. If two Dove animals meet they share. Explain why there cannot be an equilibrium where all animals act as Doves. Explore whether there are any Nash equilibria in pure strategies and explain which these are and why. Derive a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium (MSNE). What is the proportion of Hawks and Doves? If the proportion of Hawks in the population of animals is greater than the mixed strategy equilibrium proportion you calculated, which strategy does better, Hawks of Doves?arrow_forwardSuppose Andrew and Beth are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Andrew chooses Right and Beth chooses Right, Andrew will receive a payoff of 5 and Beth will receive a payoff of 5. Beth Left Right 6, 6 Right 4, 3 Left 6, 3 Andrew 5, 5 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Andrew chooses and Beth choosesarrow_forward
- Consider a game with two players A and B and two strategies X and Z. If both players play strategy X, A will earn $300 and B will earn $700. If both players play strategy Z, A will earn $1,000 and B will earn $600. If Player A plays strategy X and player B plays strategy Z, A will earn $200 and B will earn $300. If Player A plays strategy Z and player B plays strategy X, A will earn $500 and B will earn $400. Player B finds that: a) strategy Z is a dominant strategy. b) strategy X is a dominant strategy. c) he has no dominant strategy. d) strategy X is a dominated strategy. e) strategy Z is a dominated strategy.arrow_forwardHello, please help me to solve this Game Theory question. Thanks in advance! Hobby hunter Jack decides what to do the next weekend. He can either stay at home and watch movies (Movies), or call his friend Katherine to go hunting (Hunt). If he stays in, both Jack and Katherine get a payoff of 2. If he decides to hunt, he knows the situation with his friend will resemble a classic stag hunt game with simultaneous moves: Hunting a stag is better than hunting a rabbit, but it only works if they cooperate. The hunting subgame is captured as: Katherine Stag Rabbit Jack Stag 3 , 3 0 , 1 Rabbit 1 , 0 1 , 1 Are the Nash Equilibria of the full game credible?Comment on any Nash equilibria of the full game which are not credible.Find all subgame perfect equilibria in pure strategies.arrow_forwardHello, please help me to solve this Game Theory question. Thanks in advance! Hobby hunter Jack decides what to do the next weekend. He can either stay at home and watch movies (Movies), or call his friend Katherine to go hunting (Hunt). If he stays in, both Jack and Katherine get a payoff of 2. If he decides to hunt, he knows the situation with his friend will resemble a classic stag hunt game with simultaneous moves: Hunting a stag is better than hunting a rabbit, but it only works if they cooperate. The hunting subgame is captured as: Katherine Stag Rabbit Jack Stag 3 , 3 0 , 1 Rabbit 1 , 0 1 , 1 1. Write the normal form representation of the full game, including Jack’s initial decision.2. Identify any pure-strategy Nash equilibria. How does this compare to the pure strategy Nash equilibria of the hunting game alone?arrow_forward
- Hello, please help me to solve this Game Theory question. Thanks in advance! Hobby hunter Jack decides what to do the next weekend. He can either stay at home and watch movies (Movies), or call his friend Katherine to go hunting (Hunt). If he stays in, both Jack and Katherine get a payoff of 2. If he decides to hunt, he knows the situation with his friend will resemble a classic stag hunt game with simultaneous moves: Hunting a stag is better than hunting a rabbit, but it only works if they cooperate. The hunting subgame is captured as: Katherine Stag Rabbit Jack Stag 3 , 3 0 , 1 Rabbit 1 , 0 1 , 1 Draw the entire game as an extensive form (game tree), capturing both Jack’s initial decision (M or H) and the subsequent hunting game. Make sure to correctly label all players, actions, and information sets.arrow_forwardsuppose that the world is comprised of two countries: X and Y. Because of the absence of centralized world governance, the control of global externalities is particularly challenging, which is the case with greenhouse gases linked to climate change. The entries in the following Payoff Table describe each country's well-being under different abatement patterns: X\Y No Abate Abate No Abate 12,12 24,8 Abate 8,24 20,20 Now suppose that the game is repeated indefinitely. Define the concepts of Trigger Strategies and also the concept of Business as Usual Strategies for the repeated game. Verify that trigger strategies supporting cooperative payoffs (20,20) constitute a non-cooperative equilibrium of the repeated game when δ=0.8. Are trigger strategies still an equilibrium when δ=0.30? Explain intuitively why and verify that Business as Usual still is an equilibrium in this case.arrow_forwardConsider a sequential game where there are two players, Jake and Sydney. Jake really likes Sydney and is hoping to run in to her at a party this weekend. Sydney can't stand Jake. There are two parties going on this weekend and each player's payoffs are a function of whether they see one another at the party. The payoff matrix is as follows: Sydney Party 1 Party 2 Party 1 6, 18 18, 6 Jake Party 2 24,8 0,24 a) Does this game have a pure strategy Nash Equilibrium? b) What is the mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium? c) Now suppose Sydney decides what party she is going to first. Her roommate is friends with Jake and will call him to tell him which party they go to. Write the extensive form of this game (game tree). d) What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium from part c?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning